• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

So... Ampeg B200R or BA115???

Well if you can find a way to get the Acoustic combo go for it, I've had a BA115 for 2 years and I regret spending $350 for it.

I don't know anything about a 200W BA115? Mine is 100W. It works good as a monitor in small/medium gigs.. Don't hope for much more than that.

The amp does have a terrible tweeter hiss, I disconnected mine and I'm much happier with it. (Still don't like the amp, though :smug: )

They make quite a few versions of the BA115 now... there's the BA115T (with a tube in the preamp), the BA115HP (high power, forget the exact wattage), and then a high wattage one with a tube. All sorts of options. personally i can't stand the preamp, so i'd go with the b100r or b200r.
 
The BA series and the "Rocket" series are so different tone-wise it seems almost unbelievable that they come from the same company. The BA series amps all have a pretty clean sound -- at least by Ampeg standards -- and are all about huge bottom end and rattling the windows. The Rockets -- the B100R clearly the best among them -- are designed to emulate the fat tube sound of the old B15. They do sound remarkably tube-y for SS amps, with thick rich mids and low mids. Old-school, big-time.

Also, the Rocket series amps are much louder, watt-for-watt, than the BA amps. The B100R is surprisingly loud for 100 watts -- plenty for band practice and small gigs unless you have a very heavy-handed drummer and/or turn-it-to-11 guitar players.