• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Stop the carnage!

I'd like to propose a moratorium on parting out intact and functional vintage basses. I'd also like to make a plea for some level of sanity on pricing of parts that have obvious and significant challenges. This guy totally kills me..
  • no decal
  • no tuners
  • no finish
  • truss rod nut drove in so far with too-big driver it splintered and cracked the neck (?!?!?!)
All for $2.3k? Does anybody here on this forum actually fall for this baloney? For real? sheesh..
C'mon kids.."don't cheap out"..

Not(intentionally) creating flame-bait..but actually interested in a mature discussion:
---can you rationalize paying uber-hyper buxe for vintage parts? Even if they're "compromised"?
---have you ever intentionally parted out a working vintage bass? why?
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
One point of view is there are usually a lot of people looking for that one or two last hard to find parts to finish a resto.
The sellers know this and charge a premium of course.

I do think it's a shame to dismember a perfectly good instrument to scrape a few more dollars from collector/resto folks, but it's their gear and I have no control over what they do with it.

I'm not a Fender player, so it doesn't really burn me as much as most, but the parting out thing isn't completely brand specific, I've seen quite a few fine Ricks parted out on ebay, and it's certainly no cheaper to piece one together than buy a fully assembled example unless you already have much of what's needed or are going to fabricate your own somehow (body, neck, etc.).
 
I've purchased and sold a couple specific vintage parts on ebay. I like to keep my Fenders as close to "original" as possible, and apparently, so do others. If there wasn't a market for it, people wouldn't be doing it.
 
I'd like to propose a moratorium on people telling other people what to do with their property.

Look, I understand where you are coming from, but really?

The post was supposed to be a bit tongue-in-cheek; and intended to create discussion; not tell people what to do. I'm happy to find properly-priced vintage parts if/when I need them, but there are increasingly fewer unmolested parts as well as complete examples available for sane prices. As many of these instruments will be around long after we're gone, I feel some responsibility to the instrument for being an advocate for thoughtful custodianship and preserving originality. The bolt-together nature of their construction makes fenders particularly vulnerable. I'm not a vintage weenie per-se, but I'm advocating that careful consideration is given before forever separating parts joined in Fullerton. I care about the instrument more than just bossing people around.

Now pick up your room and walk the dog, or no x-box.
 
If I was in the business of making money on Ebay, like a lot of these people are, and I could make more money by parting guitars out, I would do it in a heartbeat. It is called a FREE enterprise system. Why don't you take issue with players who put aftermarket parts on their collectible instruments and ruin the value?
 
Where there's a market, there's someone exploiting it.

If I had parts that people considered vintage and would pay top dollar for, I'd do the same thing. I don't understand the whole vintage market anyway. I always choose function/aesthetic over the year of production, especially in terms of Fender basses where very few changes have been made over the years that affect either of them.