Here is a comparison of the M and L
And a review of the M alone
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=RDT95hIdjrzwc
And a review of the M alone
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=RDT95hIdjrzwc
Last edited:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Stop doing that. Those blocks are speaking to me! Pure GAS.I was a G&L L2000 skeptic
After hearing about them for years on Talkbass and having a hard time believing they could possibly be that good, I finally saw an L2000 Tribute hanging up at Robbie's Music in Totowa. Picked it up, plugged it in and realized within five minutes that all the hype was real...these things are incredible!
Decided to go USA so I bought the blonde one over four years ago and the silver metal-flake one this past August.
Nothing I've owned before and nothing I've played since can quite measure up to them.
(Both have the G&L Medium C-1 1/2 inch nut-9.5 Radius. Pretty sure I took the battery out of the blonde. One weighs 7.3 pounds, the other over 10 pounds. Oh yeah, and the silver one only cost $1,350...used but unplayed!)
View attachment 4207614
My wonderful bride, of 25 years (next month) bought me a brand new USA L-2000 for my birthday in January. It was back ordered, so I didn't get it until the end of the month. I am no where close to a professional player. I play in my church praise band, and have only subbed, on a couple of local gigs, or youth rallies. I do get in a few jam sessions now and then at someone's house.
I don't have a lot to offer that hasn't already been posted, about the L-2000, other than wow! I am still learning all of the features, and configurations. Playing only a few songs every Sunday, doesn't allow for much experimentation.
I am glad, that the OP began this thread, as I have learned more about it, than I already knew. In my humble opinion, the L-2000, is very player friendly, especially for a novice like me who only began playing bass, at the tender age of 44. With only a cheap Kona, and a borrowed Peavy, to compare, the L-2000 is like the difference between a Yugo, and a Lamborghini.
Guess who's on the hook, for some expensive anniversary jewelry?
I run flats on my L2500 and also backed the pickups away from the strings. That got me a much more mellow but still full tone.I like the idea of the L2K and I purchased a 2500 a few years ago. Ended up selling it quickly as I didn't gel with the sound. Kinda bright and aggressive which is the opposite of what I like tone-wise. I think an L-1K with flats might suit me well.
A very valid point and I think it should have been mentioned sooner.I like the idea of the L2K and I purchased a 2500 a few years ago. Ended up selling it quickly as I didn't gel with the sound. Kinda bright and aggressive which is the opposite of what I like tone-wise. I think an L-1K with flats might suit me well.
My wonderful bride, of 25 years (next month) bought me a brand new USA L-2000 for my birthday in January. It was back ordered, so I didn't get it until the end of the month. I am no where close to a professional player. I play in my church praise band, and have only subbed, on a couple of local gigs, or youth rallies. I do get in a few jam sessions now and then at someone's house.
I don't have a lot to offer that hasn't already been posted, about the L-2000, other than wow! I am still learning all of the features, and configurations. Playing only a few songs every Sunday, doesn't allow for much experimentation.
I am glad, that the OP began this thread, as I have learned more about it, than I already knew. In my humble opinion, the L-2000, is very player friendly, especially for a novice like me who only began playing bass, at the tender age of 44. With only a cheap Kona, and a borrowed Peavy, to compare, the L-2000 is like the difference between a Yugo, and a Lamborghini.
Guess who's on the hook, for some expensive anniversary jewelry?
highly unlikely since plek is about leveling. manual plek is far more expensive to perform, so if they own a plek machine or two, why on earth would they do that manually and then no longer be able to say it is pleked, and also spend more man hours and cost for labour to accomplish the same thing?Just confirmed with G&L today they no longer plek anything. However the neck team dresses the frets better than the plek. According to G&L
Do you have a NBD thread? Great gift from the wife. I don't ever expect anything like that from mine!

Buy used.![]()

highly unlikely since plek is about leveling. manual plek is far more expensive to perform, so if they own a plek machine or two, why on earth would they do that manually and then no longer be able to say it is pleked, and also spend more man hours and cost for labour to accomplish the same thing?
It sure sounds to me like that is marketing bull. But whatever they want to say, I'm sure they are still well setup frets.
I found this to be worth a listen: