• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Tech 21 VT Bass 1969

The speaker emulation on all our SansAmp products are designed to work "with" your amp's speaker system as well as direct. When people have a difficult time with the SansAmp into the front end of an amp they blame it on the speaker sim but it really has more to do with the host amp's preamp settings. This is why we added the speaker sim defeat switch. It makes it easier to use with an amp that has it's high end emphasized.

The VT Bass Deluxe can be modded with the speaker sim defeat switch by us. The problem with doing it on the deluxe is that if you use the pedal into an amp with the speaker sim defeated and run the DI out to the PA, you will probably not get the best tone out of the DI with the speaker sim turned off.

<<
When people have a difficult time with the SansAmp into the front end of an amp they blame it on the speaker sim but it really has more to do with the host amp's preamp settings.
>>

I've tried my VT Bass Pedal V2 as a front end for GK 800RB, Ampeg SVT 3 Pro, Ampeg B2-RE and Ashdown ABM 500 EVO II heads and in every case, I was able to get a quantum leap better tone just using the VT Bass as a standalone preamp bypassing the native preamps via the effects return, poweramp in or line in patch points on the above amps. Though the 10" speaker simulation has it's moments and is worthwhile, I prefer the sound of the VT Bass Pedal with it bypassed so I'm glad I got the V2 pedal with the 10" speaker simulation defeat switch.
 
Well maybe guitar amps might overhype the top end, but many bass amps these days are pretty flat. The whole reason I would want a speaker sim defeat button is so that I can let my tweeterless cab provide a more natural top end roll off when using heavy distortion/fuzz. The speaker sim's cutoff point is too low for my taste and it sounds a bit peaky at the cutoff point. However, with this new speaker sim button, disengage it and it's like a blanket going over my cab due to this added filter when I want it to be the opposite. I can fight the filter by boosting the treble but that doesn't sound quite right.

Oh well, might have to send my VT and Oxford off to Mr Putnam to fix!
 
As long as you get the tone you want there really is no "wrong or right."

When I first started working here it took me a while to fully understand the "speaker emulation" circuit and the defeat switch that was added. In general you can't lump our speaker emulation in the same category as the cab sims in digital modelers and some analog devices. These are pretty much "brick wall" filters and response curves. Our speaker emulation uses more of a gentle slope on the high end because it was designed to work with a speaker cab as well as for direct purposes. It also helps to understand the architecture of the pedal. The SansAmp Circuit in the VT Bass pedal is the Character and Drive controls. Everything else is post SansAmp. This allows you to adjust the speaker emulation after the fact, the same as mic'ing a real cab and using the EQ at the board to further tailor the sound of the mic'd source. You can reduce the low end bump, bring back more mids, tame the high end etc.

The problem with using our pedal (or any distortion pedal) into a bass amp has more to do with the distortion side of things. When you start to increase the distortion you also increase the upper harmonic content which tends to sound like fizz or sizzle. This is further exacerbated by using a bright tone with your amp's preamp or when using a full range cab. The speaker sim was designed with this in mind.

JimmyM I think Tech 21 was so flush over the success of the VT and VT Deluxe that they got a little carried away. Great little pedal...not what I would want for the pre on an $1100 amp.

Our amp is made here in the US. Our employees are paid a good livable wage that can't even be compared with off shore labor that work in work camp type of facilities. While you can't avoid China when it comes to electronics... the metal work, assembly, painting, testing and design work is all done here in the US.

It's simple mathematics and economics. If you want to compare our amp, then compare it to another US made amp. It would be best if you "heard and played" it first. If players want to use the VT Bass Deluxe with an inexpensive power amp that's fine too. An amp is an investment. If you get your tone $1100 won't really be an issue in 5, 10 or 20 years. My '66 Fender Bassman is still a great amp . I have spent several thousand dollars on computer equipment and mobile phones over the last few years and much of this stuff is in a landfill somewhere.
 
Our amp is made here in the US. Our employees are paid a good livable wage that can't even be compared with off shore labor that work in work camp type of facilities. While you can't avoid China when it comes to electronics... the metal work, assembly, painting, testing and design work is all done here in the US.

Good for you guys, stick to it! I will happily pay a bit more if the product is quality and fits my needs. :)
 
I'm all for US built stuff when possible. And you're right...I have not plugged into the 69 amp itself, but I have plugged the VT and VTD into a power amp many times. Won't deny that it sounds really good, either. Don't forget that even though I'm now back to being a tube snob, I'm one of the biggest Character pedal supporters since they came out, bro, and I've bought three of them and still use two regularly ;) But for me it works better as a tone shaper and dirt box than a preamp.

Also, after seeing the plots again, I saw that the rolloff slopes were indeed more gentle than I had thought at first. Sorry if I gave folks the wrong impression.
 
Does the VTD have a speaker sim defeat or is it always on like the original VT?

I don't understand the point of the speaker sim on the original, considering it doesn't have a DI out... if you are driving a poweramp you probably don't want a speaker sim anyways, as your own cab should do that for you.

I guess it is part of the SVT sealed fridge no tweeter sound

Yes, it's meant to give you the sound and feel of a big 810 stack just raging away behind you. FWIW, I use and PREFER the sound of a 2x15s cab so if you spend a little time with the EQ on the VTD you can get the sound you want. Some people want to emulate the 810 sound without the weight of an 810, thus the demand lol.


That is the one thing I didn't like about the VT, but honestly it wouldn't put me off the deluxe. If I go the poweramp route I'll be getting cab that's really hi-fi, maybe like a Carvin LS 1503 or 1523 pa speaker that has really good full range response. That's the key to getting the best sound out of a guitar modeler so I figure it will be the best if your modeling the speaker with a bass rig too.

Definitely a YMMV and IME comment I'm going to make, but why get a VT deluxe and pair it with a hi-fi cab at all? Similar to a classic P-bass tone, you're falling in love with what it does as much as what it doesn't do...to the tune of the frequencies that are dulled and those that are emphasized in its response. Classic tube amps and an 810 cabinet have an inherit sound that isn't going to be the pinnacle of audio balance and represent every frequency range equally because what they did and didn't do is the sound that people want from them.

Sort of like putting spanking new hifi car speakers in a 67 camaro and saying that the 8-track player makes them sound like junk...you're right, but you're expecting something to do what it wasn't intended to do. The VT bass is made to sound as much like an overdriven SVT+810 stack as possible. The last thing I'd pair it with is an LS1523...again, this is just my opinion and insight, take it as you will.
 
I'm all for US built stuff when possible. And you're right...I have not plugged into the 69 amp itself, but I have plugged the VT and VTD into a power amp many times. Won't deny that it sounds really good, either. Don't forget that even though I'm now back to being a tube snob, I'm one of the biggest Character pedal supporters since they came out, bro, and I've bought three of them and still use two regularly ;) But for me it works better as a tone shaper and dirt box than a preamp.

Also, after seeing the plots again, I saw that the rolloff slopes were indeed more gentle than I had thought at first. Sorry if I gave folks the wrong impression.

Tubes are great for sure. Nobody is denying that. As much as everyone likes the SVT, nobody likes to carry them. I use tube amps as well as our stuff. It doesn't have to be an all or nothing affair. Most players I know have a number of different rigs. Different tools for different jobs.

I wouldn't necessarily agree that plugging a VT Bass Deluxe into an aftermarket power amp sounds the same as the VT Bass 1969 head. I'm sure it sounds fine. While the circuitry of the VT Bass Deluxe and the amp are basically the same, the preamp in the amp is operating at higher internal voltages. It is also designed as a system and the power amp is matched for that particular preamp. You also have two discrete channels that you can switch between or use them at the same time which is pretty cool. There is also a gain switch that allows you to match the output of your bass with the amp. DI, preamp out, power amp in, tuner out etc.

Anyway I'm glad you like the pedal. My band was playing in Key West a couple of weeks ago. I would have tried to look you up but you're pretty far north. Next time. It was a fun gig and we got to see some really great local players.
 
I think 1100$ do not sound that bad for such an amp. I see many benefits with the Tech. 21 VT 1969 head. If it mange to pump out the same wattage and feel as a SVT VR at 300W nobody will complain. It seems like nobody here have tried this amp to really see if it is a good deal. My feeling is, that based on the Tech21 product line, the VT 1969 is probably a killer head. When will BGM test this one??
 
Definitely a YMMV and IME comment I'm going to make, but why get a VT deluxe and pair it with a hi-fi cab at all? Similar to a classic P-bass tone, you're falling in love with what it does as much as what it doesn't do...to the tune of the frequencies that are dulled and those that are emphasized in its response. Classic tube amps and an 810 cabinet have an inherit sound that isn't going to be the pinnacle of audio balance and represent every frequency range equally because what they did and didn't do is the sound that people want from them.

As an owner of both a VT Deluxe and a hi-fi cab (fEARful 1212/6/1), and both classic and modern musclecars... I can't help but respond to this one. :D

What you're saying sounds kinda backwards to me. The point of a hi-fi cab isn't to make anything sound "hi-fi". It's to take whatever you want to feed it (hi-fi, lo-fi, fuzzy old toobs, or whatever), and make it loud, without messing it up with its own baked in voicing. A classic tube amp and 810 have a sound, yes. The VT is meant to mimic that sound. A "hi-fi" cab will just take the sound of the VT and make it loud. That's it.

Running a VT through a classic tube amp and 810 works, but you're basically "doubling up" the same sound twice. Or using it as an effect, to get different tones out of it without fiddling with the amp knobs, or cranking it to unacceptably high volumes (to get that "sound"). Same goes for other cabs... you're not getting the sound of the VT, you're getting the sound of the VT + whatever dips & bumps the cab has. Nothing wrong with it, and it can sound good. But there is some double-dipping going on.


Sort of like putting spanking new hifi car speakers in a 67 camaro and saying that the 8-track player makes them sound like junk...you're right, but you're expecting something to do what it wasn't intended to do.

The 8 track player doesn't make the speakers sound like junk. The speakers just make the 8 track loud and clear. If it sounds like junk, than the 8-track IS (and always was) junk. Get a new head unit (power amp).

Now you can hear anything you want. Put in techno, or classical, or whatever else floats your boat that requires high fidelity... it'll sound great. But you know, sometimes you just gotta hear something that sounds like it was meant to be played back while blasting down the road in a 67 Camaro. So put in some Foghat. Maybe Deep Purple, or Sabbath. A-ha! That's what our VT pedal is doing... giving us some sweet, classic sounds!

Now crank it up and smile at how it sounds so much louder, clearer, and just plain better than that old 8 track ever did. :bassist:

The VT bass is made to sound as much like an overdriven SVT+810 stack as possible. The last thing I'd pair it with is an LS1523...again, this is just my opinion and insight, take it as you will.

And to me, that is EXACTLY what to pair it with (or something even better). If it already sounds like an overdriven SVT+810 stack, why muddy it up with other stuff... just take that sound and make it loud. The job a "hi-fi" cab is best suited for. And is also what is going on when you send that DI to FOH.

Really, putting the VT through a "hi-fi" cab is more like cruising around in a big modern muscle car, while blasting Foghat through a great modern sound system. It feels and sounds, in many (while not all) ways, a lot like a more comfortable version of an old school hot rod. But it'll eat the average 67 Camaro with an 8-track in it for breakfast.

Cheers. :cool:
 
What you're saying sounds kinda backwards to me. The point of a hi-fi cab isn't to make anything sound "hi-fi". It's to take whatever you want to feed it (hi-fi, lo-fi, fuzzy old toobs, or whatever), and make it loud, without messing it up with its own baked in voicing. A classic tube amp and 810 have a sound, yes. The VT is meant to mimic that sound. A "hi-fi" cab will just take the sound of the VT and make it loud. That's it.

The point of having a crossover with a woofer, mid driver, and tweeter is to give equal representation to all frequency ranges being pumped out by the amp with as little loss as possible in the frequencies being amplified. Many people complain about the woofer/tweeter setup for most bass cabs because it lacks proper representation for mids, which is why they move to cabs like the Carvins for more emphasis on mids. The VT is meant to emulate the SVT+810 sound, which it does, but the whole point of my original statement was that part of the SVT+810 sound is what it isn't doing as much as what it is doing. My assumption would be that Tech 21 engineered the VT with the majority of bass cabs on the market in mind. Compared to how many woofer + tweeter or just woofer bass cabs out there, I would be surprised if they designed it with a 3-way cab in mind and pushed it to get the best sound with that type of cab compared to the more common woofer+tweeter bass cabs. One could argue that the cab has as much, and perhaps more, to do with the sound of the rig than the pre and power amps.

Running a VT through a classic tube amp and 810 works, but you're basically "doubling up" the same sound twice. Or using it as an effect, to get different tones out of it without fiddling with the amp knobs, or cranking it to unacceptably high volumes (to get that "sound"). Same goes for other cabs... you're not getting the sound of the VT, you're getting the sound of the VT + whatever dips & bumps the cab has. Nothing wrong with it, and it can sound good. But there is some double-dipping going on.

:eyebrow:

LOL, having a hard time remembering when I ever said that you can only use the VT with a tube head and 810. I stated I use a 215 with mine and a class D SMPS Carvin BX500 with the preamp bypassed. This was about the cab, buddy...not the amp. I will say that the VT bass + power amp is the way to go IME. The best tone I've gotten was typically with older style cabs, mine being a 2x15 with no tweeter...I can't say I even like the VT bass through an 8x10 with a tweeter to be honest. You're aren't just getting "louder", you are affected the overall character of the sound depending on the cab you are using. Surely you know that there is more to a cab than just how loud it is. As I stated throughout my response very clearly, this was all IMO. Nowhere was I stating that my words were gospel.


The 8 track player doesn't make the speakers sound like junk. The speakers just make the 8 track loud and clear. If it sounds like junk, than the 8-track IS (and always was) junk. Get a new head unit (power amp).

Now you can hear anything you want. Put in techno, or classical, or whatever else floats your boat that requires high fidelity... it'll sound great. But you know, sometimes you just gotta hear something that sounds like it was meant to be played back while blasting down the road in a 67 Camaro. So put in some Foghat. Maybe Deep Purple, or Sabbath. A-ha! That's what our VT pedal is doing... giving us some sweet, classic sounds!

Now crank it up and smile at how it sounds so much louder, clearer, and just plain better than that old 8 track ever did. :bassist:

We could get into the tangent of music being mixed and the response being curved differently in newer speakers to accommodate the newer mediums being used (i.e. - CDs, hi-def CDs, MP3, etc), but that's a little off-topic. The point of that analogy was that when they were engineering and created the SVT sound way back in the day, they weren't using a 3-way PA cab with it...it was designed to be used with tweeter-less bass cabs like the 810...not to say it CAN'T sound good on another cab, but that's not "the" SVT sound that we refer to as the classic SVT tone. The cab is just as important to getting the classic tone as the amp is, thus the character of the SVT+810 rig as a whole.

Where the 8-track analogy comes in is that you won't be getting the same experience (which you sort of noted when you listed bands like Foghat being played on an 8-track player) when you have kicker hi-def 2-way speakers in your 67 camaro as you would with stock speakers or something designed similarly in there.

Another analogy you might be able to catch a little easier would be playing a DVD on a standard def TV and then playing it on a hi-def 1080p tv. To the naked eye, you're going to notice that the DVD looks worse on the 1080p television than the standard def tv. We had returns ALL THE TIME at Best Buy when people complained that their TV looked terrible, when come to find out there were pumping in standard def cable and regular dvds. This is a little different than what we are talking about here, but the point is that when you have something representing a signal (be it audio or video) with a great deal of definition, it's less flattering to something that may be a bit antiquated.

And to me, that is EXACTLY what to pair it with (or something even better). If it already sounds like an overdriven SVT+810 stack, why muddy it up with other stuff... just take that sound and make it loud. The job a "hi-fi" cab is best suited for. And is also what is going on when you send that DI to FOH.

Really, putting the VT through a "hi-fi" cab is more like cruising around in a big modern muscle car, while blasting Foghat through a great modern sound system. It feels and sounds, in many (while not all) ways, a lot like a more comfortable version of an old school hot rod. But it'll eat the average 67 Camaro with an 8-track in it for breakfast.

And that's fine...for you. I believe I thoroughly expressed in the original post that this was my opinion and to take it as that. Tone is an incredibly subjective thing...right up there with what can be defined as "nostalgic", who is considered "classic rock", and what kind of women are hottest (but we knooooow it's redheads ;) ). The preamp tries to emulate that going into the power amp as best it can, the final punch is coming from your cab one way or another. There's no arguing that your cab affects your overall tone, but if the 3-way cab sounds good to you as the 2x15s does to me, then that's wonderful. I'd say I'm not in that territory either because I'm using ported 2x15s as opposed to a sealed 8x10. The DI will likely be mutilated by a sub-par soundguy in most situations anyways, so I've given up trying to change that in most situations lol. :smug:

What you're describing is more like putting a Rickenbacker 4003 through a PJB amp and 32x5 cab...you're taking something with vintage-style sound origin and pre and post amplifying it in a modern way. If that's your thing, great for you. There are people who trick out classic cars with modern refinements and if that's what they like then that's awesome. I try and stay as true to the original as I can when I do something similar to that, which is why my 70's Realistic turntable and receiver STILL uses the original 2x10s cabs and not some new Klipsch speakers. My dad and I hooked his new Sony cabs up to it and no, it wasn't even close to the same. :D

To each his own, YMMV, IME/IMO and all that stuff I said before. If you wanna hook up a freakin 60's Fliptop to PJB cab, that's your business...I'm not here to tell you what to play, but I was stating that a cab WILL affect the overall sound of a rig and that it may not be what someone is expecting if they plug this gear into a 3-way cab. Whether or not it's a good thing is up to your opinion and taste. I go back to my example of the P-bass, it's famous for what it does and doesn't do. Nobody grabs a P-bass expecting it to sound like a Fodera and vice-versa, and most people don't want a P-bass that sounds like a Fodera (well, not if it COSTS the same as a Fodera lol) because they are totally different animals designed for different things. Sorry, but if what I said bothered you, just ignore it...none of it was addressed to you anyhow :hmm:
 
Wow, no need to get bent out of shape. Wasn't knocking you at all, just disagree with the premise, based on personal experience with said gear. I can do that, right? :cool:

The point of having a crossover with a woofer, mid driver, and tweeter is to give equal representation to all frequency ranges being pumped out by the amp with as little loss as possible in the frequencies being amplified.

Yes. Which allows great flexibility in getting out whatever sound one wishes to pump into it. Especially from gadgets meant to emulate entire systems, which is exactly what the VT Bass is.



but the whole point of my original statement was that part of the SVT+810 sound is what it isn't doing as much as what it is doing.

And if the "emulator" isn't feeding it to the hi-fi cab, it won't be doing it either.

My assumption would be that Tech 21 engineered the VT with the majority of bass cabs on the market in mind. Compared to how many woofer + tweeter or just woofer bass cabs out there, I would be surprised if they designed it with a 3-way cab in mind and pushed it to get the best sound with that type of cab compared to the more common woofer+tweeter bass cabs.

Their original product, from which all else sprang, was a DI box that was both intended and commonly used for emulating a tube rig and sending it to FOH or recording desk. Most products since then have had the same functionality and usage to varying degrees. I've been running mostly Tech21 products as my primary preamps for over a decade, FWIW.

One could argue that the cab has as much, and perhaps more, to do with the sound of the rig than the pre and power amps.

In the case of "non hi-fi" cabs, absolutely. Hence the speaker emulation in the VT, which can't even be turned off in any but the VT2 models (unless sent in to Putnum for a mod).


LOL, having a hard time remembering when I ever said that you can only use the VT with a tube head and 810.

You didn't, and I didn't say you did. I used the same example you gave, and then said the same goes for other heads/cabs, too.


This was about the cab, buddy...not the amp. I will say that the VT bass + power amp is the way to go IME. The best tone I've gotten was typically with older style cabs, mine being a 2x15 with no tweeter...I can't say I even like the VT bass through an 8x10 with a tweeter to be honest. You're aren't just getting "louder", you are affected the overall character of the sound depending on the cab you are using. Surely you know that there is more to a cab than just how loud it is.

I agree, believe it or not. The speaker emulation is there for that reason. And I like it through a somewhat flat-response, relatively uncolored, hi-fi cab for the same reason. The speaker emulation is already giving the character and coloring, one doesn't need to add the character and color of another cab to it. You can, and it can sound good, but it sounds great through the "hi-fi" rig too. Your experience with differing results through various cab configs pretty much backs that up.

As I stated throughout my response very clearly, this was all IMO. Nowhere was I stating that my words were gospel.

Of course not. I'm just saying my experience with VT through "hi-fi" cab was excellent, and why it'd likely be the same for anyone else that actually tried it.

The point of that analogy was that when they were engineering and created the SVT sound way back in the day, they weren't using a 3-way PA cab with it...it was designed to be used with tweeter-less bass cabs like the 810...not to say it CAN'T sound good on another cab, but that's not "the" SVT sound that we refer to as the classic SVT tone. The cab is just as important to getting the classic tone as the amp is, thus the character of the SVT+810 rig as a whole.

Yep. Which is why they are emulating the entire rig, speakers and all. Which in turn, sounds great played back through "hi-fi" gear.


Where the 8-track analogy comes in is that you won't be getting the same experience (which you sort of noted when you listed bands like Foghat being played on an 8-track player) when you have kicker hi-def 2-way speakers in your 67 camaro as you would with stock speakers or something designed similarly in there.

It'll sound much better, and probably closer to what the engineer was hearing in his sweet JBL (or whatever) monitors when it was mixed. :D

Another analogy you might be able to catch a little easier would be playing a DVD on a standard def TV and then playing it on a hi-def 1080p tv. To the naked eye, you're going to notice that the DVD looks worse on the 1080p television than the standard def tv. We had returns ALL THE TIME at Best Buy when people complained that their TV looked terrible, when come to find out there were pumping in standard def cable and regular dvds.

I follow, but DVD is a bit higher res than standard def, so the picture is actually a little better on 1080p. Most of those sets can scale down and show 720 just fine. And with an upscaling player (most BluRay players will do that) to smooth the edges out, it looks quite nice. So... they needed a new head unit, too. :D

This is a little different than what we are talking about here, but the point is that when you have something representing a signal (be it audio or video) with a great deal of definition, it's less flattering to something that may be a bit antiquated.

But if the old is actually quite good (SVT/810, film stock), and is available in a convenient format that retains much of that quality (VT/BluRay transfers), the result can be awesome. :cool:

And that's fine...for you. I believe I thoroughly expressed in the original post that this was my opinion and to take it as that.

I did. And I expressed mine too, no need to get grumpy bout it, lol.

and what kind of women are hottest (but we knooooow it's redheads ;) ).

Nah. Black haired girls. Reds are close second, though, and there is plenty of overlap between those categories. ;)


What you're describing is more like putting a Rickenbacker 4003 through a PJB amp and 32x5 cab...you're taking something with vintage-style sound origin and pre and post amplifying it in a modern way. If that's your thing, great for you.

It's more like putting a Ric through an SVT/810, putting a mic on that, and sending the result to FOH. Except it comes out of my cab that way, same as in FOH. (Unless the sound dude is overzealously mangling it on his end.)

There are people who trick out classic cars with modern refinements and if that's what they like then that's awesome.

Pro-street? Nah, my classics stay classic. What I'm saying is the modern crop of muscle cars stomp all over the majority of the old ones performance wise. Also speaking from direct experience here. I still love the old ones, and have a couple of my own, but it is what it is.

but I was stating that a cab WILL affect the overall sound of a rig and that it may not be what someone is expecting if they plug this gear into a 3-way cab.

If the gear includes emulating a cab sound that they like, they'll be good to go, if they send it through a good 3-way.

Sorry, but if what I said bothered you, just ignore it...none of it was addressed to you anyhow :hmm:

Didn't bother me at all, in fact I thought it interesting. I had direct experience with that type of setup, though, and thought I'd share it.

Um... "neener neener". Or something. :spit:

Kidding. ;) :bassist:
 
Wow, no need to get bent out of shape. Wasn't knocking you at all, just disagree with the premise, based on personal experience with said gear. I can do that, right? :cool:

I wasn't, but when someone tries to inject their opinion in a "let me school you, kid" statement it's KIND of challenging lol. It's not like I'm speaking from playing the stuff in a store, I own and gig on it as well. I disagreed with the statements you made about my replies to other TB'ers so I responded accordingly. However you take it is up to you, as is your choice of cab. If I came off as having the fangs out, I didn't want it to...this is usually as bad as my diction and grammar gets, on here :(

Yes. Which allows great flexibility in getting out whatever sound one wishes to pump into it. Especially from gadgets meant to emulate entire systems, which is exactly what the VT Bass is.

And if the "emulator" isn't feeding it to the hi-fi cab, it won't be doing it either.

Well the point of flexibility wasn't on the menu...I was referring to getting the classic SVT tone as close as possible with the VT and whether they had 3-way cabs in mind when they designed it...IOW, were they counting on the person using it having a mid-range driver? I simply assumed they did not, which may or may not be correct.

In the case of "non hi-fi" cabs, absolutely. Hence the speaker emulation in the VT, which can't even be turned off in any but the VT2 models (unless sent in to Putnum for a mod).

Cab size? Cone type? Drivers? Ported/sealed? This stuff matters in any cab :confused:

You didn't, and I didn't say you did. I used the same example you gave, and then said the same goes for other heads/cabs, too.

My mistake, thought you were implying that I made that statement. I admit fault on that one! lol :(

I agree, believe it or not. The speaker emulation is there for that reason. And I like it through a somewhat flat-response, relatively uncolored, hi-fi cab for the same reason. The speaker emulation is already giving the character and coloring, one doesn't need to add the character and color of another cab to it. You can, and it can sound good, but it sounds great through the "hi-fi" rig too. Your experience with differing results through various cab configs pretty much backs that up.

Of course not. I'm just saying my experience with VT through "hi-fi" cab was excellent, and why it'd likely be the same for anyone else that actually tried it.

Yep. Which is why they are emulating the entire rig, speakers and all. Which in turn, sounds great played back through "hi-fi" gear.

I refer you back to my statement on what it was designed to be played through and that it's in the context of getting as close as possible. For some people they want the same ballpark, others want it right on home plate. To each his own. FWIW, I'm sure it does sound good through your cab. Again, refer to the "were they counting on a mid-driver" statement above.

It'll sound much better, and probably closer to what the engineer was hearing in his sweet JBL (or whatever) monitors when it was mixed. :D

With how scooped the mixing is these days on CDs and how the speakers reflect the "smiley face" EQ'ing, I'd have to hear that to believe it. Believe me, working in Car Audio install...we had a lot of free time to think up stupid things to do lol. Can't say I heard any speakers that didn't fart out on the mids getting pumped out by my record player. "Farty" was an understatement! :bawl:

I follow, but DVD is a bit higher res than standard def, so the picture is actually a little better on 1080p. Most of those sets can scale down and show 720 just fine. And with an upscaling player (most BluRay players will do that) to smooth the edges out, it looks quite nice. So... they needed a new head unit, too. :D

But if the old is actually quite good (SVT/810, film stock), and is available in a convenient format that retains much of that quality (VT/BluRay transfers), the result can be awesome. :cool:

It's a lot closer to 480 than 720. If you ever want to be entertained for an hours solid, try telling someone who just shelled out $2,500 on a new TV that they need something else to make their DVDs look decent...castigation ensues lol. That doesn't solve their issue with standard def cable, though. I am vastly curious about where you get film stock though! ;)


I did. And I expressed mine too, no need to get grumpy bout it, lol.

Nah. Black haired girls. Reds are close second, though, and there is plenty of overlap between those categories. ;)

Nobody's getting grumpy, just keeping the convo straight and separating opinions from something quantifiable. If I take a serious tone, it's because I'm passionate about what I do....which is waste time on here instead of working or doing something productive! :hiding:

Oh man, gloves are off now... ;)


It's more like putting a Ric through an SVT/810, putting a mic on that, and sending the result to FOH. Except it comes out of my cab that way, same as in FOH. (Unless the sound dude is overzealously mangling it on his end.)

[Insert "Captain Picard Facepalm" here]

Oh man! Where did I put that thing??? :help:


Pro-street? Nah, my classics stay classic. What I'm saying is the modern crop of muscle cars stomp all over the majority of the old ones performance wise. Also speaking from direct experience here. I still love the old ones, and have a couple of my own, but it is what it is.

"Style" is the name of the game there, and I think you got it on the automobile aesthetics end of things..minus the speaker systems ;) :cool:

Didn't bother me at all, in fact I thought it interesting. I had direct experience with that type of setup, though, and thought I'd share it.

Um... "neener neener". Or something. :spit:

Kidding. ;) :bassist:

OH! Here it is!

picard-facepalm.jpg


Thought I lost that thing! :smug: ;)

All in fun, I wouldn't take it (and I don't to yours, in all seriousness) personally. We're having fun on here, but sometimes forget to pull the punches when debating. As with any of that stuff, we're having different experiences with our VT's and there's 10514​ variables to how we've gotten to that point depending on how we have our VTs set alone.

For a SS and active bass rig, I'd be pretty stoked to have a 3-way cab! I'd just use it in a different way. I could compare my VT experience to my Peavey VB2 experience as well. Used it with my Avatar neo 2x10's with tweeter and was wondering if the head was broken, it sounded that bad. Slapped it on top of my 2x15s and it was like night and day. The VT sounded good on the 2x10s, but not as good as the 2x15s. Different strokes, man...but FWIW, I'm sure your rig sounds killer too. Same as I'd date a hot brunette, but if a redhead came along...well, I think you see where this is going! lol. If we all used the same stuff, life would be boring (we'd be guitarists)..it's cool that you're having good results with mixing stuff up and using those cabs. If I saw you rocking it with a 3-way cab, I'd probably high five you after the show and tell you about how much better redheads are than other chicks ;)

Peace :bassist:
 
I wasn't, but when someone tries to inject their opinion in a "let me school you, kid" statement it's KIND of challenging lol.

Huh... not intended that way at all. Don't see it in a re-read either, but my apologies if you thought I was kicking at your shins.

It's not like I'm speaking from playing the stuff in a store, I own and gig on it as well.

A VT through a "hi-fi" cab? Didn't get that impression, you listed lots of traditional cab combinations. I own and gig on the very combination you thought didn't make sense. And the reasons you gave didn't match up for me on paper/theory, let alone in my daily reality.


Well the point of flexibility wasn't on the menu...I was referring to getting the classic SVT tone as close as possible with the VT

The flexibility allows getting out whatever you feed it with minimal hassle and tweaking. And getting sound from a VT is on the menu. I would argue that given the design, capabilities, and intended use of the VT, that it IS going to be the closest possible. If the sound is there in the VT, it's coming out of cab that way, same as it would to FOH or a recording desk.

and whether they had 3-way cabs in mind when they designed it...IOW, were they counting on the person using it having a mid-range driver? I simply assumed they did not, which may or may not be correct.

Given my familiarity and long experience with Tech21 products, and with the usage scenarios they recommend, I would say they definitely did. Like I said, their original product was focused more toward direct FOH and recording use. Full range full frequency systems that will absolutely have the midrange well covered, whether they are a 4-3 way with dedicated mid drivers or 3-2 way with a low reaching HF section.

Pretty much all of their later products have retained that functionality, even the simpler character series pedals with only 1/4 unbalanced outputs. It's right there in the manuals.


Cab size? Cone type? Drivers? Ported/sealed? This stuff matters in any cab :confused:

Of course it does. It all contributes to the sound of the cab. But put them all together, then look at the whole system... the resulting cabs can be divided more or less into two categories. 1. Traditional cabs that (intentionally or not) introduce a lot of color to the sound. 2. "Hi-fi" cabs that do not, or at least do it to a much, much lower extent. (No speaker is flat of course, but some are way flatter than others.)

The speaker emulation in the VT is meant to simulate the sound of an Ampeg 810 with multiple mics on it. And deliver all of the color it provides. (Theoretically, anyway... in reality one can get close, but never exact. And "which" Ampeg 810 do they mean anyway? A modern SVT810e, or an old flatback, or what?)

Play it through a "colored" cab, and you have to take that coloration into account. Tech21 has already been in this thread explaining that their cab simulation takes into account that it can and will be used that way, and is tame enough that the results will still be good.

Play it through a non-colored cab, and it's a lot simpler. You get pretty much exactly what they designed it to sound like, the same sound they expect you to get when using it as a DI box to FOH or recording desk, as stated in the manual.

You mentioned that direct into a power amp (or power section of a head) is the way to go. That's because you are getting less coloration by "other things", and more of the straight VT sound. Well, the same goes for the cab. Take the color out of the cab equation too, and you're getting more of the straight VT. It was designed to be able to be used that way, so it should sound good. I can confirm it does. I already named my cab, if you were asking those questions (size, drivers, porting, etc) about my cab, the answers can all be found [Invalid or Expired Link Removed].

I refer you back to my statement on what it was designed to be played through and that it's in the context of getting as close as possible. For some people they want the same ballpark, others want it right on home plate. To each his own. FWIW, I'm sure it does sound good through your cab. Again, refer to the "were they counting on a mid-driver" statement above.

I've covered that pretty thoroughly by now, but to recap... yes, they were, yes it was, and I think it gets closer than a traditional cab... as close as you're going to get short of going out and buying an all-tube SVT head and 810, and making JimmyM proud. Maybe certain Ampeg heads would get closer than VT+power, but there's no cab emulation there, so it might be a little different than this case.


With how scooped the mixing is these days on CDs and how the speakers reflect the "smiley face" EQ'ing, I'd have to hear that to believe it. Believe me, working in Car Audio install...we had a lot of free time to think up stupid things to do lol. Can't say I heard any speakers that didn't fart out on the mids getting pumped out by my record player. "Farty" was an understatement! :bawl:

Surely good, well balanced car audio systems exist. Maybe not the 2-way Kickers you mentioned, but I'm not familiar with those. I assumed you were referring to just one component in a full system. Can't remember all of the pieces I had, but I built a pretty good one in the old Vette. Dual 15" JL subs, some smaller woofers & mids, & tweets of course, all on a decent crossover network. PLENTY of mids with no farting. The stock system in the SRT8 Magnum ain't too shabby, either. Mids are fine there. The old Mustang... nothing at all in that, maybe I have the original bits in a box somewhere.

It's a lot closer to 480 than 720. If you ever want to be entertained for an hours solid, try telling someone who just shelled out $2,500 on a new TV that they need something else to make their DVDs look decent...castigation ensues lol.

Yes, it is. But isn't that (not explaining the end result of HDTV with their existing equipment) the fault of either the salesperson that sold them the TV to begin with, or their own for not doing any research?

That doesn't solve their issue with standard def cable, though.

Same thing there... they should have known that before they bought the set to begin with. Take the opportunity to sell them a good OTA antenna and tell them they can get lots of other stuff cheaper by streaming (Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, etc) through their Blu Ray player if they have a good internet connection already, and they could just cable entirely. That's what I did.

I am vastly curious about where you get film stock though! ;)

I don't have access to any, but the people that made the Blu Ray discs in my collection obviously do. :D


Nobody's getting grumpy, just keeping the convo straight and separating opinions from something quantifiable. If I take a serious tone, it's because I'm passionate about what I do....which is waste time on here instead of working or doing something productive! :hiding:

No prob, and lol.

I don't get the issue with my Ric/SVT/Mic/FOH scenario, though. Is that not what the audience hears in an ideal scenario? (Spectors and SB4000 in my case, but I'd do it with a Ric too.)

"Style" is the name of the game there, and I think you got it on the automobile aesthetics end of things..minus the speaker systems ;) :cool:

80 Vette, 67 Stang, and a big red Mag SRT8 that can spank both of 'em silly, even with my whole family & bass rig on board. :bassist: And if I put a tweed grill and Ampeg logo on my cab, most folks couldn't tell the difference. (Look at JohnK's Starliner 215.) Though any bassists in the crowd would probably suspect something fishy there, with it being shorter and narrower than an 810.

All in fun, I wouldn't take it (and I don't to yours, in all seriousness) personally. We're having fun on here, but sometimes forget to pull the punches when debating. As with any of that stuff, we're having different experiences with our VT's and there's 10514​ variables to how we've gotten to that point depending on how we have our VTs set alone.

Yep, no biggie.

But go ahead and try it out, it's easy. Record something direct from your VT and play it back on various things. In particular, play it back on a full FOH system with subs. That's what it sounds like through my cab. :bassist:

If I saw you rocking it with a 3-way cab, I'd probably high five you after the show and tell you about how much better redheads are than other chicks ;)

As would I, on the first count. On the second... my black haired wife would likely be nearby, and be VERY interested in my response, being aware of my previous history with various reds.

So of course even if I did agree (I don't... almost, but no), you know what the answer must be. :ninja:

Cheers. :cool:
 
Hello

I am interested in buying this amp, but I live in the UK and see it is, AC 117v and 50 hz cycles,whereas the UK is 240V and 60 hz cycles Could I use this in the UK using a transfomer? Is there anything else I would need to use it on UK 240 AC?Hope you will have some positive answers.

Thanks

Chris:rollno:
 

Latest posts