we don't have a band fund other than a jointly agreed on purchase is jointly shared out of pocket.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
DBCrocky said:You guys have gotten business licenses for your bands and are paying quarterly taxes on your gig earnings, right? I know you guys wouldn't think of cheating your fellow citizens.
This topic has been covered many times. Unless your willing to create structure and accounting like Febs, band funds almost always end poorly.
Febs said:The nature of the band also makes a big difference. If your band is getting paid $100 total in cash from a bar once every other month, it probably doesn't make much sense to create that sort of structure. On the other hand, when you regularly play for corporate clients who require you to provide your taxpayer identification number before they'll cut you a check, it's pretty much a necessity to have those structures in place.
You're right that this topic has been covered before. Jive1's "Band Ownership Issues" thread a month or so ago dealt with a very similar topic.
I don't want band fund $s coming out of my gig split.
That's accounting principles right there. Again an example of treating it as a business, which is good!
If the band needs money, for whatever, I would prefer to pay it out of my pocket. Just tell me what it's for, how much and when do you need the money.
Wissen said:We decided on a band fund simply because, as Broken Ohms said, we are an original band that has walked out with $50 total for a night. No use splitting that up. Our biggest payout was $600 for two bands, so by the time we pay the opener, still no use splitting that up. When the band fund reaches a certain dollar amount, then we split it up. But three years later, that hasn't happened yet....