So Far in no particular chronological order of adoption we have.
#1 FFTT
#2 Jay2U
#3 pacojas
#4 Stormchaser
cool,... i'll take #0003!
ps: am i the only one that has his "ink"?!!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
So Far in no particular chronological order of adoption we have.
#1 FFTT
#2 Jay2U
#3 pacojas
#4 Stormchaser
In Germany, the saying goes " what the farmer doesn't know, he doesn't eat."
Same goes for why Fender doesn't put flats on their basses standard any more. If they save 1 or 2 dollars on the bass over
50,000 basses, it keeps the bean counters happy.
My Ibanez SR300 is strung with Ernie Ball Slinky's .130 to .065 and it sounds killer! I think that on a 4 string tuned BEAD, active basses are almost essential, and I don't think passive could really support it fully. Also, I was wondering, would flatwounds sound better than roundwound on a 4 string BEAD tuned, or is it just preference?
Thanks![]()
My Ibanez SR300 is strung with Ernie Ball Slinky's .130 to .065 and it sounds killer! I think that on a 4 string tuned BEAD, active basses are almost essential, and I don't think passive could really support it fully. Also, I was wondering, would flatwounds sound better than roundwound on a 4 string BEAD tuned, or is it just preference?
Thanks![]()
My BEAD is also passive... and sounds massive
I posted a photo of mine in other threads but here it is again.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Clippage, just a quick demo posted here when I first got my Reeves.
The OctoBird is tuned bBeEaAdD. Fundamental strings are a Circle K balanced .142 set (.059 .079 .106 .142), and octaves are a balanced .073 set (.028 .039 .055 .073). 33" scale.
![]()