Although my 'No.1' bass has been my go-to for as long as I can remember, I have always loved the sounds of P, J and MM basses on albums I grew up with, from Sade, Steely Dan, that sort of thing. At the same time, I resisted getting basses like that because I wanted to have my own sound, rather than to play an instantly recognisable type.
Eventually I realised it would be great to have one of each as a 'tool' to vary my tonal palette and closely match the sounds I recognise. Having a range of basses also helps me feel inspired and I fall in love with each bass anew when I discover a great track I want to play along with. Also, and this might sound weird, but as 'The Bass Guitar' as a 'Thing' has been so important in my life, both through BC but also in making friends, playing in bands and generally providing the foundation to my pre-child-and-wife days, I believe collecting examples of the seminal developments in bass is excusable from a collector/historical record perspective. Just researching the ins and outs of how these basses came about, leading to things like the Vigier (it was the 80s), is really interesting. Although I'd probably not share that in public for fear of beatings or at least an uncomfortable silence, I feel I won't be attacked for it the same way here, in part because you can't reach me but mostly because I know you'll provide me with the conformation bias I crave.
So after much experimentation and false starts, I have now amassed a collection of what I would consider my 'best' J, P and MM. When it comes to the MM, I have only played a few and owned two others, so I don't have as much to compare there. But as stated in another thread, nobody (or very few) luthier/companies make a 'take' on the MM bass like they do the J and P (apparently Ernie Ball are quite lawyered up) so I went straight down the line and got a Musicman for the job.
When I say 'false starts' - it's often not the way the bass sounds, but the setup I am able to achieve on the instrument I've had previously. I like a flat neck with very low action, and not every bass can do that in the same way. This has led to some painful realisations when I've had to move on otherwise fabulous basses. If I can't play it effortlessly (I don't make effort very often), then eventually it gets moved on, normally to someone who says 'how the hell did you play it with the strings painted on like this'
So here we go:
Let's start, illogically, with the bass that's NOT a J,P or MM. It's 'My' bass - it has a sound all of it's own, but it's smooth, focused, detailed and consistent. I know exactly how it sounds in studio, live, amped, the lot - and it's a very versatile bass. It's been likened to sounding like a 'velvet brick' - kind of like a Modulus flea with a wider range and glassy almost digital response.
It's a 1988 Vigier Passion Series II (Graphite neck) with a Marleaux pre, Basstec pickups and Roland GK system (I'm sure lots of you know it already)
Next, the P bass. It's a G&L SB-1 from 1991. Strung with Labella light flat wound strings, it thumps and bites. The pickup is fantastic, with a huge range of sounds on tap by backing off the volume or tone. I nearly sold this when I nearly gave up on the idea of collecting the set but soon realised that I wouldn't get another like this.
So what's next - Here's the Musicman. It's from 1983, the last year before Ernie Ball Made some changes, many probably for the better, but I love the fat slab body and the response of this bass. I have yet to try it with flats but with Elixir 40-95s (which I use on every bass except the G&L) it has that super poky top end which cuts through any mix, and the sound of pops on the G is just perfect. The previous models I had sounded a bit brittle, whereas this one sounds warmer and more 'chunky' somehow, although my setup has changed so much I can't compare for certain.
The Jazz bass with the final hurdle. I actually didn't realise for a while that the 60s and 70s spacing on a jazz made such a difference, and when I did I wasn't in the space to buy one. I have had several 60s types in the past but never got on with them, finding the sound a little too rounded for my tastes. So after a crusade to play as many 70s basses as possible (knowing the quality and weight can vary substantially) I realised the best way to get what I wanted was a modern 'take' on a vintage bass, which, more often than not, needed work to support my lazy setup. The search was on - and this is where I ended up. I wasn't able to try it before I bought it so it was an anxious wait and unboxing and restringing and plugging ining, but the reputation of the Celinder J-Update is richly deserved. It's got that grinding, airy feel where the notes have that top detail and a slap sound so consistent and rich you feel like you can bite it in mid air.
Oh and there's my 16" Wingbass with Roland GK pickup. Amazing little thing, perfect for playing synths or noodling around the house. The build quality is superb - beautifully carved black limba with a maple top. Guess what, the neck is dead straight because it's a plank of wood on the body, so the thing plays effortlessly and sounds huge.
So there we go - If you are still awake, well done. Time to take Sybil for a wet walk.
ped
Thanks for sharing. That's a great looking P, J, and StingRay trio you've got there!
