TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
IME, people with the thinner necks have poorer technique, and tend to choke it like a bat.
Those who are used to choking thinner necks tend to struggle more IME.
I think it has as much to do with nut width as the overall profile.
I don't like necks like Warwick or Spector for that reason... they're thick, but the nut width is thin.
I prefer the neck to be somewhat flat in the back too.
I disagree with these points.
My friend has formal technique and plays an Ibanez EDB600. VERY thin neck.
No baseball-bat neck-choking here!
IME, people with the thinner necks have poorer technique, and tend to choke it like a bat. The thicker neck accomodates players who have a more formal technique. It gives you more space between the tip of your thumb and your fretting fingers so that you can get more leverage on the instrument when needed. Most classical instruments are designed like this. It's the electric guitar/bass world where so much focus is on thinner necks.
I'm not saying one is better than the other, but with proper technique, thickness of the neck is mostly a non-issue, and allows you to open up to many more instuments with various sized necks and string spacings. Those who are used to choking thinner necks tend to struggle more IME.
+1small hands + thin neck =![]()
Very interesting thread. Thanks for pointing it out. I have always had a tendency to hold a bass more vertical when I play standing up. Guess that ain't so bad after all? I have never touched, nor seen in person for that matter, a classical bass so I have no idea where I got it from. (holding it more vertical)
Big -1.
Neck thickness may be a non-issue to many four-string players, but once you start moving away from truncated-range to full-range bass (fives and sixes) all that completely superfluous neck mass becomes nothing but an ergonomic hindrance to a player with proper technique.
IME, people with the thinner necks have poorer technique, and tend to choke it like a bat. The thicker neck accomodates players who have a more formal technique. It gives you more space between the tip of your thumb and your fretting fingers so that you can get more leverage on the instrument when needed. Most classical instruments are designed like this. It's the electric guitar/bass world where so much focus is on thinner necks.
I'm not saying one is better than the other, but with proper technique, thickness of the neck is mostly a non-issue, and allows you to open up to many more instuments with various sized necks and string spacings. Those who are used to choking thinner necks tend to struggle more IME.
I play with a pick too! (most of the time and no I didnt start out on guitar)Depends on how vertical. I'm not aware of many basses that will hang at a greater angle than 45 degrees or so. The upright neck posture is very ergonomic, but I'd suspect a very vertical electric bass posture would involve several unneccesary muscle groups to hold the neck up. Holding the neck often causes more hand contact with the neck, which can slow ya down.
I typically play balanced basses around 45 degrees or so with my right thumb about an inch above my belly button and a few inches to the right.
You dont know what you are talking about! Where did you come up with that? I have very good left hand fretting technique and its what I would consider formal and prefer the thinner neck like my Geddy. Oh...and guess what?I play with a pick too! (most of the time and no I didnt start out on guitar)
i still dont see what small hands has to do with the thickness of a neck. your thumb is the only finger affected by a fat/thin neck, and on a fat neck its in a more natural position (if you relax your hand, look at the distance between your thumb and the rest of your fingers. thats the size your neck should be.)
IME, people with the thinner necks have poorer technique, and tend to choke it like a bat. The thicker neck accomodates players who have a more formal technique. It gives you more space between the tip of your thumb and your fretting fingers so that you can get more leverage on the instrument when needed. Most classical instruments are designed like this. It's the electric guitar/bass world where so much focus is on thinner necks.
I'm not saying one is better than the other, but with proper technique, thickness of the neck is mostly a non-issue, and allows you to open up to many more instuments with various sized necks and string spacings. Those who are used to choking thinner necks tend to struggle more IME.
i still dont see what small hands has to do with the thickness of a neck. your thumb is the only finger affected by a fat/thin neck, and on a fat neck its in a more natural position (if you relax your hand, look at the distance between your thumb and the rest of your fingers. thats the size your neck should be.)