TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Save up for a Fender. I can tell you I recently got a Squier 40th Anniversary Precision Bass, Gold Edition and it is not good. The neck pocket has tons of overspray and is very uneven, bridge screws are driven in at angles, bad ground connection to the bridge, and more. I mean the bass looks awesome and the neck feels great but under the hood it's disastrous. All QC issues.
Why do you automatically assume that if you get the Squier that it will require upgrades? Way too many people seem to think that just because it's an "inexpensive" bass that it's somehow lacking. Changing pickups will make it sound somewhat different (maybe) but better? Highly subjective. Different strings often have a much more dramatic change in tone than pickups do.
You really should give it a chance before you just assume different pickups will somehow be an improvement. Unless you know in advance exactly what improvement you're going for and exactly which pickup will do that a lot of folks spend a lot of money chasing their tails looking for some magical sound they can't define in their own minds and thus have a difficult time ever finding to their satisfaction.
Bridges - the Fender-style bent metal bridge has been the standard for 70+ years and it works quite well, obviously. Unlikely you'll see much improvement (if any) in sustain etc going to a high mass type bridge, and depending on the Squier model it may well come with a high mass anyway. Undoubtedly some will come along here and argue that point, however anything gained there will be incremental at best.
Tuners I can see a bit more. Generally stock Fender/Squier tuners will give great service life and hold tune just fine. Going to a finer gear ratio tuner will make things a bit easier to get just exactly right but again the gain IME is small and incremental at best. Where is your Point of Diminishing Returns investment wise?
I play large places/gigs rotating between two bone stock Squier P's (a Matt Freeman and a Vintage Modified PJ) and a Fender P I paid 5X more for and tonally/looks wise/playability wise no one knows the difference, myself included. These days the Squiers, Epiphones, Sires etc of the world are perfectly good working mans instruments in stock form and just because they're "inexpensive" doesn't somehow necessarily mean they're "cheap". Give it a chance before you just start throwing money at one. Or just save up and get the one you think you want and save yourself the headaches and frustration of chasing some poorly defined thing you think you hear in your head but somehow just can't quite find.
But if you have Squire money and want the Marcus Miller sound for that price I'd Get a Sire V3 or V5 new or a Used 2nd Gen V7.
Exactly this!
Back in the 90's or even the early-aughts, hardware and electronics manufactured overseas typically skimped on materials and/or robustness of design in order to keep costs down-- flimsy hardware, pickups wound with low quality, high-capacitance wire, etc.
That's not really much of a thing anymore, although a few examples still pop up here and there.
Nowadays, "upgrading" components on an inexpensive imported instrument is more a matter of "personalization" than it is an "upgrade". The one exception I can think of is the shielding, wiring, pots, and caps-- a quality set of electronic components manufactured with tight tolerances can still make a noticeable improvement. There are still plenty of examples-- both imported and American-made-- where a linear taper pot was used where a logarithmic taper pot should have been used, and vice-versa, but Squier is not one of those brands where I have seen a plethora of examples.
The old adage "you get what you pay for" still *generally* applies... but there's still a point of diminishing returns, and the advent of computerized CNC routing and machining has brought that down to a much lower price point for many working musicians.
Give the Squier a try. If it feels good and still sounds the way a P-bass or J-bass should (and there is very little reason to believe it wouldn't, frankly), then buy it and save the extra money to put toward the best speaker cabinet you can *almost* afford!
I want to buy a Fender Marcus Miller signature 5 string but I don't have that much money right now and income is close to non existant. So should I buy a Squier 5 string and upgrade it or save up money and eventualy buy the Fender, what would you guys do?
27604042[/URL], member: 381156"]A good question might also be, "What do you think that the Fender (including squire) offers you that your current Bass does not?" i.e. What are you hoping to achieve? Yes GAS is good, but try out other instruments first and THEN decide what advantage migh be gained by changing gear.
Been there too, buying a secondhand used Fender Marcus Miller 5 here in France was... damn tough: too much pricey when you're lucky enough to find one available, too much hard to find overhall, so I choose to get a similar one custom made by a euro luthier, as I'm french. He did an outstanding job for a new custom bass that costs the same as a Fender MM 5... used. And with A list components like an Hipshot A bridge, Hipshot light tuners, Lollar pickups, Hard rock maple neck with graphite rods, swamp ash body, just upgraded the preamp a few years later.I want to buy a Fender Marcus Miller signature 5 string but I don't have that much money right now and income is close to non existant. So should I buy a Squier 5 string and upgrade it or save up money and eventualy buy the Fender, what would you guys do?