How beneficial or un-beneficial is a so-called "Wall of Sound"? Basically where the band puts ALL the amps etc..behind everyone on stage? with just PA's and subs out front?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm not sure that the GD wall of sound was "the birth" of the line array.
No doubt the Dead would agree (they've come light years in their live set up since then, too). The WOS was an attempt to accomplish things that modern technology would have made much easier. It was more than a curiosity, though. When it worked well, it was head and shoulders above anyone else's sound - in or outdoor. Experiments like that raise the bar, if nothing else.I think the Wall of Sound was a neat curiosity in its day, but I see so many acoustic nightmares in it that it couldn't have been easy to control. I'll take the modern line array/sub arrangement any day.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owsley_Stanley
Invalid Link Removed
Here's a wall of sound for ya!!!
![]()
This Is from a Who concert in 1975, at the Pontiac Silverdome
Man, no wonder Pete's half deaf!![]()
owsley designed the sound system, not the line array.
birth of the line array ? lol, you gotta go read some audio books from the 1920's-40;s. the line array was around way before the gratefull dead were alive. be carefull of the info on here,,,,,, johnny a