• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What are you reading Chapter 4

The Music and Mythology of
Col. Bruce Hampton
A Basically True Biography - Jerry Grillo; foreward Chuck Leavell

What a scene! What a story! What a character! Wish I would have been hip to it. 1971-2017. Certainly was around, but I grew up in the northwest with its own scene.
Current drummer in my band is from Atlanta and turned me on to this book; his step dad played trombone (heavyweight Union guy - still very musically active) in Hampton's shows.

From wiki = Bruce Hampton (April 30, 1947 – May 1, 2017) was an American musician. He was a key figure in the Atlanta, Georgia music scene, mentoring numerous other musicians who became national stars. His own musical style was avant-garde, combining elements of jazz, fusion, southern rockand jam band styles.

He first rose to prominence as the leader of the Hampton Grease Band. Adopting the moniker Colonel Hampton B. Coles, Retiredor alternatively Col. Bruce Hampton Ret., and sometimes playing a sort of dwarf guitar called a "chazoid", he later formed several other bands, some of whose names include The Late Bronze Age, The Aquarium Rescue Unit, The Fiji Mariners, The Codetalkers, The Quark Alliance, Pharaoh Gummitt, and Madrid Express.

Good book. Fairly well written. A LOT of information and stories featuring some very heavyweight cats.
 
Last edited:
The Bastard Instrument.jpg
 
I am charging through the Lady Sherlock series by Sherry Thomas. VERY clever takeoff from the Conan Doyle stories, highly readable, with fun twists and ideas that Conan Doyle wouldn't have thought of. Really a fun series. Most of the books have been out long enough to be inexpensive on Ebay.

 
I just finished Dostoyevski's Crime and Punishment, in a paperback that I think is the same one I had when it was assigned in high school. I think at the time I got through it fine, but it didn't stick with me or make too much of an impression (I liked The Brothers Karamazov way better then and still do). I can understand why now, going back through it 35 years later. It's slow-paced, moody and mopey, with a lot of histrionics and muttering and people not coming clean saying what they mean to say. But it also builds in a weirdly compelling way and the last fifty pages or so felt like a page-turner.
 
I just finished Dostoyevski's Crime and Punishment, in a paperback that I think is the same one I had when it was assigned in high school. I think at the time I got through it fine, but it didn't stick with me or make too much of an impression (I liked The Brothers Karamazov way better then and still do). I can understand why now, going back through it 35 years later. It's slow-paced, moody and mopey, with a lot of histrionics and muttering and people not coming clean saying what they mean to say. But it also builds in a weirdly compelling way and the last fifty pages or so felt like a page-turner.

I love both books, but Crime and Punishment is a particularly fascinating psychological treatment.
 
I love both books, but Crime and Punishment is a particularly fascinating psychological treatment.
Good observation. I think maybe Crime and Punishment is more psychological in focus, while Brothers K is more philosophical. I think one of the things that held my interest in C&P was trying to figure out what Dostoyevski meant for us to make of Raskolnikov. He's obsessed by this sort of Nietzschean idea of being a great man, beyond good and evil, and he has all these people who adore him one way or another; but all he ever really does is lie on the couch and mutter to himself in the streets, and his crime is so petty and tawdry when you come down to it.

It's actually interesting, now that I think of it, that we DO get indications of him having a grand character. Initially it's just him giving the 30 rubles to Sonya's family, which seems like an impulsive gesture, but later we hear that he rescued children from a burning building and had another very generous act; but we only hear about these latter instances in the epilogue, as references that lighten his sentence.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lee Moses
Been a tough go for my reading list lately since the school year started up again. Haven't had the mental energy after a rowdy beginning of the year! But I've managed to finish Gargantua and Pantagruel, which, though having some funny bits, was mostly not what I had hoped for. Certainly a "book of the people" in the Renaissance, it was far often too gratuitous for my tastes, and not enough substance (or - which could very well be entirely possible - not enough substance that I understand from my modern lens) to justify the gratuitous events. I had initially hoped to read this book in just under a week, and it took me about three!

In the mean time, I've been catching up on my comic collection, reading mostly Daredevil and Moon Knight. Certainly a different tone and genre than Gargantua and Pantragruel!
 
  • Like
Reactions: hrodbert696
Been a tough go for my reading list lately since the school year started up again. Haven't had the mental energy after a rowdy beginning of the year! But I've managed to finish Gargantua and Pantagruel, which, though having some funny bits, was mostly not what I had hoped for. Certainly a "book of the people" in the Renaissance, it was far often too gratuitous for my tastes, and not enough substance (or - which could very well be entirely possible - not enough substance that I understand from my modern lens) to justify the gratuitous events. I had initially hoped to read this book in just under a week, and it took me about three!

In the mean time, I've been catching up on my comic collection, reading mostly Daredevil and Moon Knight. Certainly a different tone and genre than Gargantua and Pantragruel!
I think I started on Rabelais a couple years ago and didn't make it more than a couple chapters. Impressed that you completed it!
 
I think I started on Rabelais a couple years ago and didn't make it more than a couple chapters. Impressed that you completed it!
And that's about all I can say - I completed it. Can't remember many details as they all ran together. The main idea seemed to be "drink, enjoy yourself, fornicate, and have fun", and numerous characters quite literally crapped themselves in surprise throughout the book. While that new "humanism" idea was spreading during the Renaissance and echoed many of these sentiments, I think Rabelais went a bit extreme with it in my opinion! Of course, it is satire, and to truly understand satire you have to understand the culture, and I definitely do not know every cultural reference that I'm sure he's making. Perhaps that's the problem, and that's on me! In the modern times, I know people have said the exact same things about South Park!
 
  • Like
Reactions: hrodbert696