• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Which bass will be the next T-40?

Agreed with all the G&L posts.
I'll never understand the T40 resurgence. My guess is bass buyers are older and more about collecting/nostalgia than actually gigging their instruments these days.
I remember a few years ago when I saw someone asking $600 for one. I thought the seller was out of his mind. Peavey was in every music store around me in the 80s/90s. You could find a T40 at every pawn shop for $100 or less.
 
I agree with the ATK. However, there are way too many of them around, in many different trims. And while Peavey made a lot of T-40s, they’re still fairly hard to come by.

My vote goes to the Dave Bunker-built Ibanez USATK from the 1990’s. There were only a few hundred made, so they’re already primed for cult status.

USA-made? Check. Unusual controls? Check. “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder” looks? Check. Unnecessarily large bridge assembly? Check!

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the next T-40. :laugh:

View attachment 5325704

in a funny way, this is accurate because a big problem with the T-40 was getting to that truss rod.

many (most) of these usa-ATK basses have non-functioning truss rods. the bunker concept was very cool but in practice did not work and many of them either broke or cracked the neck wood up near the 2nd-3rd fret or near the headstock.

otherwise those were super, super cool basses. i had one for a short while and was really disappointed that it could've been perfect if it had a working truss rod.
 
Agreed with all the G&L posts.
I'll never understand the T40 resurgence. My guess is bass buyers are older and more about collecting/nostalgia than actually gigging their instruments these days.
I remember a few years ago when I saw someone asking $600 for one. I thought the seller was out of his mind. Peavey was in every music store around me in the 80s/90s. You could find a T40 at every pawn shop for $100 or less.
My T40 was made in Mississippi in an American factory, and it set the mark in low end presence for every bass I owned thereafter. Very few have been better. They would have a price of about 3000+ today (if the company had managed to survive the stockholder trend to offshore which has lessened a lot since) I sold it because of weight, it was heavier than my SD Curlee, my Guild, my fretless Rick, my Ibanez, and my Vantage. Just about the same weight as my Mahogany/ebony Carvin, but the Carvin has infinate sustain. I Have heard that some old Fenders were heavy, ash can be heavy, but I wouldn't know. I payed a 50s Tele bass once that was as light as a feather and Resonant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knumbskull
TL;DR for the 4 other pages, so I don't know if it was mentioned, but the Ibanez ATK basically followed a similar path (the earlier, single pickup runs from Japan/Korea mostly).

They were well made basses, but tended to be hefty.
For a long time, you could find them dirt cheap. People wrote them off as just a basic MM copy.
Then, once people started to realize that they were pretty amazing, prices went up and supplies became scarce.
While they haven't quite reached the peaks that the T40 has seen, they are no longer dirt cheap, that's for sure!
 
  • Like
Reactions: knumbskull
*Cue 1000 unfunny replies about T40’s being insanely heavy even though they’re really not any heavier than other basses of that era.

To answer your question… I think the ATK is a good call.
While I never put my T40 on a scale, it was much heavier than any bass I had before or since. Mostly Jazz basses but nothing that even came close to the weight of my ash body T40. The weight was not a problem and had nothing to do with why I got rid of it, I just didn’t care for the neck and when I had a chance to get a really slim necked Foundation, I gladly traded the T40 in on one.
 
Given the T40’s advanced level of control technology and options, I’m thinking some kind carbon fiber construction loaded with SOA modeling software and groundbreaking pickup technology, all under 5~7 pounds. :D
 
Nothing is heavy when you are young.

Yeah, except the T-40! I got mine in high school (1983), and even as a pretty athletic kid, I bought a flexible neoprene strap to manage the weight. I loved the darned thing though.

Probably something G&L

Agreed, and I'm thinking the M-2000/M-2500 because G&L recently took them out of production, both for USA and Tribute lines (though apparently they are available through the Custom Shop). Presumably this was because they didn't sell very well, but they are fantastic basses, so I could imagine them becoming highly sought-after on the used market as more players experience them.
 
So where did the "T40 is sought after" thing come from?

While I know there are some people who really dig the T40, I also think what made it kind of cool is that you could get it for really cheap and it would yield a plethora of semi-useable sounds. Now that people are in the "don't lowball me, I know what I've got" stage...it's way less desirable for me personally.

As for predicting the next T40...if we could predict it, it wouldn't be the next T40. Noone in their right mind would expect the T40 to be worth more than $300-400... :)
 
The current listings are crackulous, t-40s sell under $800.

But to answer your question the only option would be carvin because nothing else is cheap and USA made and “undervalued”. The EB Subs don’t count because everyone that buys them just wants a stingray.
 
Honestly I think the only reason T-40s are so hyped is because at a certain point in history they were a fairly versatile bass that was made in the USA that you could buy for like 300-400 bucks, those days are long gone. but now there are plenty of other USA peaveys ($400-500) and like others have said older Carvin/kiesel ($500-900) models that go for reasonable prices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kodiakblair