One point to consider. Neck depth. The lack of frets will make the neck feel a bit thinner than the fretted version.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Agree, but I am not real picky about such things. I have played Ibanez guitars for sometime. Now those are tiny!One point to consider. Neck depth. The lack of frets will make the neck feel a bit thinner than the fretted version.
Tapes for the best of both worlds and none of the minuses!Ibanez appears to be the choice. Now the question of flats or rounds can begin..
I guess you could say the Squier has "good bones" but the ones I tried all needed a bit of work to get them in better playing shape. The fret line veneers weren't always even with the fingerboard, one seemed like the neck needed a shim, etc. On the other hand, the SR370EF basses that I tried all seemed to have better fit and finish. FWIW, I also like the Ibanez hardware better.
"bang for the buck" is just cost/benefit: given those two as options, i'd vote "ibanez" in any price range,* especially if you don't want to 'futz around' with mods and the like.I just want the best "bones" for the buck
Not in this one unfortunately, or in any of the cheaper SRI don't know about that specific model but many Ibanez models allow you to bypass the preamp, so you're not tied to it if you don't like it.
i'd vote "ibanez" in any price range,* especially if you don't want to 'futz around' with mods and the like.
agreed, my experience/expectation, too..... but the Ibanez remains completely stock. Part of that is probably due to FSO's being so easy to mix and match parts and I like to tinker even though I'm not very good at it.... part of it is due to the Ibanez being so good where everything just works.