- Jun 30, 2010
- 49,582
- 221,921
- Disclosures
- musician/artist/owner - Gildaxe
The question was "Why the hate?" . The answer seems to be; there isn't any real hate. We all seem to agree that yes, it is a good tone wood, and yes, it's nice and light. You may not agree, but most of us also seem to agree that, as a structural component of the overall bass (or guitar; I have both), it dings and dents too easily, and it's pretty poor when it comes to holding screws. Which, is also the conclusion of every wood guide you can find... If an easily dented wood that won't hold screws well (or, sometimes, for very long,) is what floats your boat? I doubt that anyone here will tell you not to use it. Please yourself, by all means...![]()
I use it to please the player playing it quite frankly, which coincidentally includes myself. Oddly enough, players really like a light bass that sounds great and balances well. And I wouldn't assume that I'm not aware of it's shortfalls. Other than pick-guard screws (which are not regularly removed) and strap-pegs (if done correctly with appropriately long screws, again - no issue), the only potential issue is the bridge anchors but like the pg and strap-peg screws, if they are installed correctly the first time - there is no future issues with screws magically working their way out of the wood. If I have any doubt at all, (at the bridge) I epoxy maple dowel plugs for the bridge mounting screws for a more dynamic connection. And finally, yes, it does dent and ding - I won't disagree. It is a potential finish shortfall and one either lives with a nice light bass they like playing regardless of it not being "perfect" - or not. Some enjoy fetishizing their perfect basses, but at the end of the day it's an instrument to be played, not put on a pedestal. I personally can't wait until my basses get a blemish so I can stop worrying about them being perfect. But as always... to each, their own.