• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why Rickenbacker?

Agreed. The Pup cover is part of the look that separates this bass from it's modern stable mates. I'm a finger playa and I don't have issues with Pup covers, I just move my hand to the left or the right of said 'obstruction'. Grieves me to see folks rip off the covers immediately before playing it and say they get in the way. I think you should learn to play around said obstructions. But what do I know?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FunkHead
The reason the people who love “Rics” “love Rics” is that they got lucky and obtained a good one before trying too many okay ones and not-good ones. The reality is that they love Their Ric, not all Rics. You’d probably love Rics too if you tried Their Ric instead of the ones that never find a home.

Some people try more than ten without finding a keeper. Some only try two or three and give up.
Hmmm - not sure I agree with that...

ric - 8 Rics in garden - 201017ad.jpg


The 5-string did go, but I got another 4-string to replace it.
ric - 4003 88 - front - 220222.jpg

I still need to get a couple more to get to 10 though!
 
They also use 44awg rather than the usual 42. This is why they have insane resistance ratings but are still rather quiet. I'm not sure how/if this translates to a difference in timbre, but it's worth noting.

Using smaller wire lets you get more turns on a given bobbin size, but also adds resistance, which will damp the resonant peak of the pickup - the high mids will be a little lower.
 
Come one. Really? If this were true, RIC would have stopped making basses a long ago. I mean who could stay in business selling 10-40% of a product?

They sell every bass they make.

Well, RIC found a brilliant way to sell sub-standard basses: They offer a sub-standard warranty too, which means they won't need to take them back for repairs/replacement. As long as people keep buying them for the looks they get away with it. ;) (I'm only partially joking btw...)

Of course I'm not saying ALL Ricks are poor quality. Many are absolutely superb instruments. But to some degree I agree with the post you are quoting. There are lots of SHOCKINGLY poor Rickenbackers out there too. Even a quick glance through this thread will show you that opinions are EXTREMELY divided and not just on subjective things like tone and ergonomics but also about reliability and build quality. When opinions on build quality vary this much it should tell you something about the manufacturer.

I work at a guitar workshop so I get to see a lot of the REALLY bad ones. My own Rick (purchased brand new) also more or less self-destructed after around 7-8 years (as explained in more detail in my earlier post) so I am obviously a bit negatively biased here...
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
Reason #1: Chris Squire
Reason #2: Mike Rutherford
Reason #3: Paul McCartney
Reason #4: Geddy Lee
Reason #5: Paul Simonon

All in all, I LOVE the sound!!! The necks on the 4001 from the 70s are SUPER thin and fun to play! The Electronics on the newer ones are more versatile and cover more ground, though the necks are a little chunkier. I just love the sound and aesthetics enough that I'll work with the cons! And out of devotion for the Squire aesthetic, I'll keep my bridge cover on and adjust my playing accordingly!

Great list! Would add Glenn Hughes- his time with Deep Purple (and perhaps with Trapeze in the 70’s).
 
Well, RIC found a brilliant way to sell sub-standard basses: They offer a sub-standard warranty too, which means they won't need to take them back for repairs/replacement. As long as people keep buying them for the looks they get away with it. ;) (I'm only partially joking btw...)

Of course I'm not saying ALL Ricks are poor quality. Many are absolutely superb instruments. But to some degree I agree with the post you are quoting. There are lots of SHOCKINGLY poor Rickenbackers out there too. Even a quick glance through this thread will show you that opinions are EXTREMELY divided and not just on subjective things like tone and ergonomics but also about reliability and build quality. When opinions on build quality vary this much it should tell you something about the manufacturer.

I work at a guitar workshop so I get to see a lot of the REALLY bad ones. My own Rick (purchased brand new) also more or less self-destructed after around 7-8 years (as explained in more detail in my earlier post) so I am obviously a bit negatively biased here...
Luckily the new ownership has improved the warranty experience tenfold. Ben Hall has commented in a few places that the old warranty card that explains the risk of “non rick certified strings” is super antiquated and they don’t turn down anyone who uses their warranty nowadays.
I have seen him personally reach out to people with the single-truss rod issues that came from the shift this year.
(That being said I agree with you)
 
If you look at the pickup position response curves I posted, a Ric cancels a lot of low mids, which makes the treble clank more obvious.
The clank is more a function of poor technique and relatively little neck relief, I think; more of an effect than a timbral characteristic.

But the frequency response might make it stand out more, true, though. I guess I have that to thank for really having to clean up my technique when I got the 4005XC - christ, what an unforgiving instrument! In a good way!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
So who's the British equivalent of Rick James then?
Ain't one mate as far as I'm aware, t'was the US that bought soul to this cold corner of Europe, apart from the fact that Soul in the day in the States was seen as barely tolerated in the 60's and marginal at best. UK took their artists and spat 'em back to you guys where Motown was formed. Soul imported into the UK was recoined 'Northern Soul' as many of the clubs that played american soul were based in the North of England (Stoke, Wigan etc) and there were all nighters of amphetamine fuiled dancers bringing it home well before Hiphop break dancers.
Rick James came later in popular music, when you guys really appreciated your homegrown talent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
When I was a kid, in the mid-70s, the Rickenbacker 4003 was like a private jet: highly aspirational. They were always among the more expensive basses in circulation, something that hasn’t changed that much, it appears. Only working players seemed to have them—which, to me, said it all. And man, did they look GOOD!

The only one I’ve ever played belongs to a friend and is heavily modified, sporting Bartolini pickups. (FWIW, it sounds bitching.) He uses it for reggae. Go fig’r.

I’ve gotten to the point where I do not keep seeking greater satisfaction when I’ve already succeeded beyond my wildest hopes. But if one came around in an outstanding deal, in GWO, I’d totally jump for it, just to see.

And IMO, they still look amazing. I’ll take one in Jetglo, to go.