TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Try this one. Even music channels have to declare their content. My issues is I don't even know how. They don;t make it easy like a box to check when loading the video. I think that is by design.
Thanks. I'll look into it. I have a few videos online, they are not explicitly for kids but kids could watch them if they wanted. I feel like there is so much existing content on there already that they'd be rather foolish to just blanket all their content with a requirement that would expose users to that much risk. They'd best be prepared to lose most of their users if they start doing that.So a act passed in the late 1990's that is to protect Children will be applied to creators over some law suite google lost. So you have to declare your videos as for kids or not for kids. But like I say it's not being made easy.
It looks like hundreds or thousands channels will go poof by the dead line. Also that youtube will give no clear guide lines on how to decide what way to declare. Something about if your video is not in compliance you could be fined by the FCC 400,000 dollars over much of nothing. To be totally safe you have to pull out of youtube or hire a lawyer to sort it out for you.
So you put the Parental Advisory sticker like on albums on all your video thumbnails and all is good?So you have to declare your videos as for kids or not for kids.
Prosecuted by whom, and under what conditions? I mean, I can't imagine my harmless music videos present some prosecutable offense. I do understand putting the onus on the creator, but wouldn't that be a proactive thing that would protect them in the event someone posts something kids shouldn't see?YouTube was found to be leading children into videos that were decidedly not family friendly.
They are now putting the onus on creators. If your content is labeled incorrectly then you will be prosecuted and YT will be held harmless.
Prosecuted by whom, and under what conditions? I mean, I can't imagine my harmless music videos present some prosecutable offense. I do understand putting the onus on the creator, but wouldn't that be a proactive thing that would protect them in the event someone posts something kids shouldn't see?
Prosecuted by whom, and under what conditions? I mean, I can't imagine my harmless music videos present some prosecutable offense. I do understand putting the onus on the creator, but wouldn't that be a proactive thing that would protect them in the event someone posts something kids shouldn't see?
"This video contains content known to the state of YouTube to be harmful to children."
Problem solved.![]()