• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

My Top Tips for taking better photographs with your pocket camera.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've received lots of positive comments (and a PM from this thread) about the quality of the photos that I've posted and I wanted to share my "secrets" :p with you all, since I read these same tips on TB a few years ago myself.

I have 3 Golden Rules, which apply to almost every bass/equipment picture that I take and the photograph below actually illustrates all 3 of these points in one shot (all will become clear later ;)):

de8f8768.jpg


- Rule #1 : Always use a tripod.

It doesn't matter if it's a larger tripod, like the one above, or even a little ($10) pocket-sized one, but a tripod is essential to avoid camera shake - the single biggest problem with most "blurry" photos that you see.

- Rule #2 : Always use the timer function.

Every "point and shoot" pocket camera I've ever used has a timer function for the shutter (usually 2 or 10 seconds). Even with the camera on a tripod, it is still easy to cause the camera to shake a little when pushing down on and releasing the shutter button. If you just set the timer to 2 seconds and then press the button, the camera has time to steady itself before it takes the picture. The other useful side-effect of this technique is that it allows you to move yourself (i.e. your shadow/reflection) out of the shot. No "Sock Shots" for me, my friends :D!

- Rule #3 : Never use the flash :scowl:.

Well, I say "never", but a flash can sometimes be useful, if you really want to bring out the detail in a really darkened area, (like a control cavity, for instance), but I'd avoid for everything else.

The single most important thing to keep in mind here is that you don't need lots of lighting to take a picture without the flash. All you need to do to compensate (although your camera will probably do it for you anyway) is to set the exposure to a slightly longer time. It's easy to do on most point and shoot cameras, although you may just have a selector for general lighting conditions (like "sunny", "cloudy" etc.). You'll be amazed just how little light (natural or artificial) you actually need to get a good, bright, detailed photograph :). Try it some time ;).

Other Tips:

As well as those three "musts", there are a couple of other things to watch out for, when trying to optimise your cameras performance.

Most important, IMO, is the "close up" mode. Nearly all auto-focus cameras still allow you to select modes for distance shots or close up work - remember to switch between the two when you move from a shot of the whole bass ("normal" mode) to a shot of just, say, the bridge ("close up" mode)...

IMG_0717.jpg


Additionally, many cameras have something called "macro mode", which allows you to focus in really close - if your camera has it, try using it, it's the only way to get shots like these without losing the focus ....


IMG_0485.jpg


7548ee56.jpg


So, that's how I get my (fairly good) results - no expensive equipment, no artistic talent, just some basic tips, picked up right here on TB ;).

I hope that I didn't come across as patronising at all there :hmm: and that these tips might help to improve the quality of some of the pics of all your sexy basses :p!

Just, remeber this pic ;) - without following all 3 of the Golden Rules, this picture could not exist (think about it) ....

de8f8768.jpg


[/LECTURE]
 
here's some additional information from Fender32 :


(EDIT: Additional image hosting information added at request of fellow TB members)

So, now you've created your digital masterpiece and downloaded it onto your computer, but what next!? Obviously, you want to share it with the good people of the TB community :smug:. How does that work, then!?

Truthfully, I didn't know about image hosting myself, during my first few weeks on TalkBass and ended up posting a thread to ask the question, "How come you're all posting big pictures of your basses and I have to resort to thumbnail attachments"? The one person who responded, typed just one word, "Photobucket". A quick Google revealed that Photobucket was actually a website, which offered free membership and the possibility to upload your own digital photos onto their web server, from where you could then post them as links in forum threads. These "links" are prefixed and suffixed with the web codes "
B] and [B]
". In between those two brackets is the file name for your photograph, from the image hosting website. For example, "http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p279/Bluenile32/My Bass Collection/IMG_1215.jpg".

When you've posted the link into your thread and hit the "Preview" button, you will see the picture magically appear in your thread, at a size of up to (appx.) 800 x 600 pixels. Now, here's a little something to think about, when you set up your account options with whichever image hosting service you end up using - [B]What size should you set as the default setting for your uploaded images [/B]:hmm:?

As I've already mentioned, TB limits the size of posted images to around 800 x 600, so that we can view each complete picture on almost any normal size computer screen, without having to use the scroll bars. This [I]doesn't[/I] mean that you [U]cannot[/U] post images with a larger dimensions, it simply means that if you [I]do[/I], the image will be automatically compressed to fit within the limitations imposed by the TalkBass forum. It [U]can[/U], however, still be viewed at it's full resolution by clicking on the image, which will then open up another Internet Explorer window and take you directly to the stored file on the image hosting website. However, there is a disadvantage to posting larger images - the compressed image can easily become distorted and lose a lot of definition :(.

Have a look at the two imaged posted below:

Note that the first one ([B]800 x 600[/B] pixels) appears to be quite nicely in proportion with good resolution, just as it might have come from the camera :).

[ATTACH=full]1382208[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=full]1382209[/ATTACH]

The second image is actually a larger version of the same file (at a resolution of [B]1024 x 768 [/B]pixels). You will notice, when you move the cursor over this image, that the pointer turns into a hand icon and that clicking on it opens up a new window, containing the full size image. But, what you [I]also[/I] might notice is that the compressed image, though the same size as the first one when viewed on the TB page, is actually quite distorted around areas such as the parallel strings and the frets and doesn't (IMHO) look anywhere near as good quality as the first, smaller image :rollno:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1646-1.jpg
    IMG_1646-1.jpg
    113.3 KB · Views: 8
  • 61c7c82c.jpg
    61c7c82c.jpg
    76.8 KB · Views: 6
  • Like
Reactions: digmeout
and some more from Fender32 :


So, my own personal preference (since about a month ago) is to set up my Photobucket account upload settings to store images at a size of 800 x 600 pixels. This is a pretty good size for most Internet forums, I think, as most of us don't usuall bother to click on the larger images to view them at their full resolution and instead tend to just look at them as they are (and probably wonder to ourselves why they look so distorted :p).

The final point that I'd like to make about image posting on TB, concerns what I'll refer to as "horizontal posting". This is where images are posted next to each other (horizontally), as opposed being stacked one on top of the other (vertically). What we should consider, when posting the image links into our posts, is how they will actually appear on the (many and varied) screens of our fellow TBers. If you're posting many, small images (say, around the 300-400 pixel width), it generally looks better if you post them side-by-side, or in neat little groups like this ...

Carrots1.jpg
Carrots7.jpg

Carrots6.jpg
Carrots4.png

Carrots8.jpg
Carrots9.jpg


The problem with posting too many images (especially large ones) horizontally, is that you'll cause the page to widen, not just for your post, but for every single post on that page :(! This is frankly, an annoyance to other TBers and probably makes a lot of work for our Moderators, who may occassionally be asked to edit these posts.

So, how do you know where to post the links, in order to arrange the images on the screen? Well, you'll soon work it out for yourselves, but just to save any first time image posters from incurring the wrath of others ;), here's an example of how the image file links would be for a horizontal post:

etc.


... and this is how you would place them for a vertical string of images (starting each link on a new line):



etc.

As for where to go for free image hosting services, we're pretty much spoilt for choice these days! I just did a quick Google search and pulled up a list of names here, but I've no experience with using any of them (apart from Photobucket), Nor is this list meant to represent the "biggest and best" in Internet image hosting - it's just a starting point for you ;).

www.flickr.com
www.photobucket.com
www.imageshack.us
www.imagehosting.com
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
[This invalid link has been removed]

Again, I hope that I haven't come across as to patronising here :( and also that these tips might help those new to the forum and allow us all to view more visually satisfying posts in the future :).

Thanks for reading!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.