• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Capacitors in relation to a varitone type application

davelowell2

I’m not superstitious. Maybe a little stitious.
Supporting Member
Apr 20, 2006
4,561
10,103
NY
Hi, fellas, got lots of questions here. Thanks in advance.

I have been messing with DarkHorses' varitone box and here goes...

1. Can you point me to somewhere explaining the values of caps and how to interpret them in the frequency range? Like, if you use a .01 uf, a .001 uf, and switch between them, you'll notice X. I understand that the .01 rolls off more highs than the .001, but at what frequency? Is that the right way to say this?

2. I'm looking to be able to determine how to order them in a switch from brightest to darkest.
I want the open first, then I have these values... .001, .0047, .0068, .01, .022, .047, .1. Is that the correct order to go from brightest to darkest?

3. I have a 12 position switch on the way. From above, I'll have, with an open position and a kill switch, 9 spots used. For the other three, can I combine two caps? And what will the effect be? Is it a viable, usable, worthwhile experiment?

Thanks to Dark Horse for making these fun electronics experiments. I'd be lost without him.

Dave.
 
Good to know, I was thinking along those lines after I submitted. And I will use a tone pot, but on the one that is my experiment, there is no tone pot?

Still works the same?
 
So, I put in 250000 for the volume pot, then .01 for the cap, I got 6.4. What is 6.4?
That's Hz, Hertz, the corner frequency. The larger the cap value, the lower the frequency, and vice-versa.

However, as I'm looking at it, the very high value of the pot is throwing off what I would expect from the filter. So it may be that I'm totally mistaken about the volume pot acting as R in the varitone circuit.

Anyone else here able to correct this misunderstanding?
 
I assume this is in response to the question about the order of things?

I like that I can use two caps together for more possibilities. That will be cool.

You do understand that two caps in parallel gives a result exactly that same as if you'd used a single cap with a value equal to the SUM of the values of both caps, right? It doesn't exactly give a different effect except for the value being different. There are ways to switch a few caps to give lots of values. Some decade boxes do this.
 
That's Hz, Hertz, the corner frequency. The larger the cap value, the lower the frequency, and vice-versa.

However, as I'm looking at it, the very high value of the pot is throwing off what I would expect from the filter. So it may be that I'm totally mistaken about the volume pot acting as R in the varitone circuit.

Anyone else here able to correct this misunderstanding?

Yes. Let me clear this up a bit. First off understand that a pickup is a coil of fine wire. That creates an inductance (as seen in the pickup specs) and also a resistance (also seen in pickup specs). And in addition there is a capacitance of each turn of wire to it's neighboring turns.

This means that every pickup is an LCR circuit. It is a RESONANT circuit and typically without any additional cap the frequency of that resonance is usually at the higher audio frequencies or beyond. By changing these various values (by changing the amount and kind of wire used in the pickup etc.) you can change the amount and center frequency of the resonant peak of the pup. That is what give various models and brands of pickups their characteristic tone.

Now the C value above can be changed by simply wiring an additional capacitor across the pickup. That will move the resonance DOWN in frequency making the peak deeper in tone. Since the output rolls off rapidly above resonance, the more C you add the more deep any less bright the tone.

But I don't want to over-simplify this because it's NOT simple! When you have an LRC circuit not only is there a resonance frequency, but the presence of R changes what is known as the "damping" of the circuit. That determines the sharpness of the resonant peak. And obviously the R seen by the pickup circuit is MORE than the R of the coil of wire. There is the R of the volume control plus the added R of the amp input hooked to that. And worse than that the value of the R may change with the setting of the volume control. We've all seen instruments where the tone changed drastically as we adjusted the volume.

The bottom line is that yes, it is possible to figure out how the given pickup will work with various caps across it but you'll probably need a simulation program like SPICE to do it. But, really who cares? You really have no need of a total theoretical analysis of this. You've got a bunch of caps and a switch. So hook them up and see what they do. Use your ears. If you want more fun sub a 250k volume control for a 500k or vice versa and see if it makes any difference.

If you go look at some of the curves for commercial tone adjusters you can see what I'm talking about as for the higher cap values the roll off moves lower in frequency and the amount of peaking that occurs can vary from none to fairly sharp hump before roll-off just depending on the equations that determine that sort of thing.

You've got the right idea, just try things and see how they sound. You can always put it back the way it was if it sounds like crap.
 
A slightly simpler explanation is that the tone circuit is not an RC low pass filter - the entire circuit including the pickups have to be taken into consideration. And it gets even worse with more than a single pickup.

SPICE, as bassbenj alluded to, is the only way to know the response ahead of time, and there's an additional problem with that - while some pickup manufacturers publish the resistance (R) and the inductance (L), I haven't seen too many publish the capacitance (C) of their pickups.
 
You do understand that two caps in parallel gives a result exactly that same as if you'd used a single cap with a value equal to the SUM of the values of both caps, right? It doesn't exactly give a different effect except for the value being different. There are ways to switch a few caps to give lots of values. Some decade boxes do this.
I've only bought the caps listed and they don't fill up all 12 spots. I was looking for a way to use up the other spots. I understand it won't have a different effect, but the right combinations would give something I don't have, correct?
Like .0047 and .022 together for one position. With the caps I have, that's a new combination, right?
I just want to do this for maybe three spots to fill out the twelve.
 
Go for it. Basically when you combine caps in parallel, you add their values together. .0047 + .022 = .0267, in other words not a huge difference from .022, but maybe worth trying.

If it were me, I'd try to make gradually increasing steps of capacitance from zero (no capacitors) to your max value.

I would try to space them evenly like
none, .000680, .001, .0022, .0047, .0068, .01, .022, .047, .068. .1, .22 which gives 12 values. If really large or really small values give tone that is not usable, then remove those. If the jump between two values seems to give a large difference in tone, then split the difference and add a value in between those two. You can get any oddball values by putting caps in parallel and adding up the values of all of them.

This should hone you in on a nice selection of tone capacitors.
 
Thanks, guys, that's the kind of info I was looking for but did not know how to word.

I am a little bit limited by what suppliers have in stock. I don't want to make an order sometimes for a few caps and then pay a bunch for shipping. That's why I asked about using what I will have. I tried to get it all at one time, caps, switches, box, pots, jacks.

Thanks again! I'll let you know how it turns out!
 
I've been scouring google for a while now and haven't been able to find some similar info, though this thread keeps coming up.

Ive decided Im building a box with a varitone for creating a low-pass filter and having another for creating a high-pass filter. I found this video on youtube and the guy shows different caps with different freqs that they cut off at. How did he calculate that? I want to have the high pass one do like 20, 30, 50 and maybe 80 hz or something similar...

here's the vid.