• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Broke Down and bought a DI

First of all, for occasional use and especially as a backup, when using an active bass, the Whirlwind may be the IDEAL alternative to nothing at all. By the time you realize you need a backup, it's probably not the time to be splitting hairs between DI's. In fact, splitting hairs is not what live audio is about.

At the level, and the kinds of acts I work with, it's expected that sound check goes smoothly and efficiently. It also means focusing on the overall sound of the band, not focusing on any one item unless it's the focus of the band. Often, I spend less than 5 minutes on drums, mostly a line check and to set gates as needed and to be sure there's no rattles. If the bass sounds good in 15 seconds, why shouldn't I move on. I generally spend no more time on guitars than I do on bass, or keys etc.

[old guy's story] Was handling FOH duties for the "featured act stage" at one of the largest traditional (mostly) jazz festival in the country. About 10 years ago, one of our Genz Benz endorsers ("Igor" Glenn) who is also a long time friend of Jeff's and lives in the Scottsdale area was performing at the festival as he does most years, really good guy and has a nice tight trio. Calling him traditional jazz is coloring way outside the lines as there's a lot of western swing and folk jazz along with the modern country flavored "big band" mixed in. His sets are always totally full (in a 1000 seat room). I head up to the stage to help set up and he takes me aside and hands me a secret revised stage plot that nobody, especially the festival organizers, knows about. There's a couple extra guitar inputs, banjo mic and a couple more vocal mics. I ask him what's up and what should I expect as I want to be prepared, he says I'm always prepared and don't worry, go with the flow and mix approriately. He also says that if I don't know anything about what happens, I'm sure not to get in trouble... this part catches my attention but I roll with it.

He and his band do about 20 minutes, it's a vocal heavy show so much of my attention is on the vocals and especially the bass as that's the lead instrument (yeah, this does happen sometimes), then he tells a short story about the late 1960's and early 1970's, and the music scene that was happening around the folk movement. He then brings his guests and former bandmates on stage, I have a good rough monitor mix already set, and they launch into a 20 minutes of music with the entire house on their feet. It was a revival of the old touring group "The New Christie Minstrels", who had been off the road for years (by that time). As I grew up mixing many of these sorts of tours in the late 70's through the 90's, I dropped right into folk rock mode within seconds, vocal blend first, guitars (three I recall) next forming the music bed, then the banjo with both melody and rhythem, bass supporting the bed (bass had previously been the lead). I spent no time worrying about drums because there were none. Easy peasy.

What a great band, great show, great experience. Igor was right, he had confidence that I would be able to prioritize parts on the fly and get it sorted out both efficiently and effectively. I had confidence that his experience with me mixing FOH for his band all those times allowed him to accurately judge my ability to support his "surprise" and deliver the goods switching styles on the fly. I knew that he wasn't the type to set people up to fail, nor throw those same people under the bus. I remember exactly the DI being used for the bass, only because it was one of mine (on his amp) AND that it didn't matter one bit in the big scheme of things. Not a single audience member left disappointed (or impressed) by the bass DI. They did leave talking about the wild and crazy time everybody had at that show, and while there were a few festival "administrators" that had their feathers ruffled, they knew better than to say anything about it. Band was all great guys, 100% pro from start to finish. There were some TV guys there to watch the show and I believe they took this concept and made a live for TV (PBS?) event later on (not at our venue). [/old guy's story]
 
Last edited:
Has everyone here seen the movie/folkumentary 'A Mighty Wind' ? LMAO...

Sounds like a couple of the writers might have been at that show Andy ;)

If you haven't seen it, I highly recommend, from the same guys as 'Spinal Tap' and 'Best in Show'

Classic !

Very funny film!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pimmsley
First of all, for occasional use and especially as a backup, when using an active bass, the Whirlwind may be the IDEAL alternative to nothing at all. By the time you realize you need a backup, it's probably not the time to be splitting hairs between DI's. In fact, splitting hairs is not what live audio is about.

At the level, and the kinds of acts I work with, it's expected that sound check goes smoothly and efficiently. It also means focusing on the overall sound of the band, not focusing on any one item unless it's the focus of the band. Often, I spend less than 5 minutes on drums, mostly a line check and to set gates as needed and to be sure there's no rattles. If the bass sounds good in 15 seconds, why shouldn't I move on. I generally spend no more time on guitars than I do on bass, or keys etc.

[old guy's story] Was handling FOH duties for the "featured act stage" at one of the largest traditional (mostly) jazz festival in the country. About 10 years ago, one of our Genz Benz endorsers ("Igor" Glenn) who is also a long time friend of Jeff's and lives in the Scottsdale area was performing at the festival as he does most years, really good guy and has a nice tight trio. Calling him traditional jazz is coloring way outside the lines as there's a lot of western swing and folk jazz along with the modern country flavored "big band" mixed in. His sets are always totally full (in a 1000 seat room). I head up to the stage to help set up and he takes me aside and hands me a secret revised stage plot that nobody, especially the festival organizers, knows about. There's a couple extra guitar inputs, banjo mic and a couple more vocal mics. I ask him what's up and what should I expect as I want to be prepared, he says I'm always prepared and don't worry, go with the flow and mix approriately. He also says that if I don't know anything about what happens, I'm sure not to get in trouble... this part catches my attention but I roll with it.

He and his band do about 20 minutes, it's a vocal heavy show so much of my attention is on the vocals and especially the bass as that's the lead instrument (yeah, this does happen sometimes), then he tells a short story about the late 1960's and early 1970's, and the music scene that was happening around the folk movement. He then brings his guests and former bandmates on stage, I have a good rough monitor mix already set, and they launch into a 20 minutes of music with the entire house on their feet. It was a revival of the old touring group "The New Christie Minstrels", who had been off the road for years (by that time). As I grew up mixing many of these sorts of tours in the late 70's through the 90's, I dropped right into folk rock mode within seconds, vocal blend first, guitars (three I recall) next forming the music bed, then the banjo with both melody and rhythem, bass supporting the bed (bass had previously been the lead). I spent no time worrying about drums because there were none. Easy peasy.

What a great band, great show, great experience. Igor was right, he had confidence that I would be able to prioritize parts on the fly and get it sorted out both efficiently and effectively. I had confidence that his experience with me mixing FOH for his band all those times allowed him to accurately judge my ability to support his "surprise" and deliver the goods switching styles on the fly. I knew that he wasn't the type to set people up to fail, nor throw those same people under the bus. I remember exactly the DI being used for the bass, only because it was one of mine (on his amp) AND that it didn't matter one bit in the big scheme of things. Not a single audience member left disappointed (or impressed) by the bass DI. They did leave talking about the wild and crazy time everybody had at that show, and while there were a few festival "administrators" that had their feathers ruffled, they knew better than to say anything about it. Band was all great guys, 100% pro from start to finish. There were some TV guys there to watch the show and I believe they took this concept and made a live for TV (PBS?) event later on (not at our venue). [/old guy's story]


That's just dang cool.
 
I use JDIs and J48s in my acoustic trio. Why degrade your sound if you don't have to? You can get them used for $100 to $120. I've bought all of mine used, most of them right here on TB. I also have a bunch of Countryman Type 85s that are very good, too. I don't trust cheap DIs.

I agree 100% with this. I also bought my JDI used ($130 I think). Radial's and Countyman are staples for good reason, they are simple and sonically pleasing plus they provide excellent isolation against ground loops and the like. Like I said in my earlier post, my bass does sound noticiably better with the Radial JDI, better than the Tone Hammer I used before and better than the Eden Navigator before that. To qualify that further, transparent is the adjective I would use. I'm still interested in trying a REDDI for that sound but using the JDI in a less is more approach has been one of the most satisfying periods in this particular season as a bass player.

On another note, did anybody mention they are built like a 1972 Ford F-250? Heavy and built to take a beating!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TonyP-
First of all, for occasional use and especially as a backup, when using an active bass, the Whirlwind may be the IDEAL alternative to nothing at all. By the time you realize you need a backup, it's probably not the time to be splitting hairs between DI's. In fact, splitting hairs is not what live audio is about.

At the level, and the kinds of acts I work with, it's expected that sound check goes smoothly and efficiently. It also means focusing on the overall sound of the band, not focusing on any one item unless it's the focus of the band. Often, I spend less than 5 minutes on drums, mostly a line check and to set gates as needed and to be sure there's no rattles. If the bass sounds good in 15 seconds, why shouldn't I move on. I generally spend no more time on guitars than I do on bass, or keys etc.

At the level you're doing sound, you're probably dealing with pros who have good gear and good tone, which means pre-set sound check is mostly setting gain, compression, and gates, and evening out the source for the frequency curves of the FOH speakers. The sucky level of sound is when you constantly deal with people coming in with untuned drums and $250 guitars with old strings and max the gain and scoop the mids on their Crates and entry-level Peaveys. There's a lot more doctoring going on at the board to try and make that sound at least decent. Those latter gigs are why I never seriously pursued doing live audio, despite having an aptitude for it. I'd hate having to pay my dues trying to make those situations sound decent.
 
Ahhhh, paying dues is the subject of a new thread that I'm sure would be filled with stories weirder than most of us could possibly imagine (except those of us who lived them)
 
  • Like
Reactions: LiquidMidnight
At the level you're doing sound, you're probably dealing with pros who have good gear and good tone, which means pre-set sound check is mostly setting gain, compression, and gates, and evening out the source for the frequency curves of the FOH speakers.

This is why I'm surprised he made his previous comment.
If your doing sound at a pro level you know what the difference is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Humbled
At the level I am at, I do the same thing as at the lower levels except that I have more and better tool, more quality time to set things up well and test, and especially, I have (generally) better cooperation from players who understand how all the small factors fit into the big picture when it comes to the production.

Once I have good inputs, I still have to set FOH levels, comps and gates, fx, wait for the monitor guy (or vis versa) and then go onto sound check. Sound check is not for doing the above things, nor is it for troubleshooting. Sound check is for fine tuning the mix to the room AND for fine tuning monitor mixes and for the band to fine tune themselves and if they choose, to run through material.

I will choose the most appropriate tools available for the job... they may not be what is perceived in the marketing world as "the best", but they will be the most appropriate for my needs. I separate marketing glitz and glamor products (ie. heavily marketed brand name devices) from specific devices that allow me to do my job, one that I have done quite successfully for 30+ years, as well as possible. Most pros understand this and make their choices accordingly, even if it's not the sexy product featured in the latest marketing slick (I mean trade magazine).

Why are there so many basses on the market? Which one is better? Why? I think you will find more disagreement on this question than agreement. Well, amongst professional sound guys, there are a lot of good, solid choices outthere too, and we each choose what we use based on our needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TonyP-
Seriously, the cheap DI boxes (like the IMP-2) sound like junk compared to the Radial, Countryman, and etc... However, would anyone hear the difference during a gig through most cheap club PAs... most likely not.

And why play a nice bass? I should just save a pile of money, get rid of my Roscoe, my Radial JDI, my Genz Benz amp, and get a Squier, IMP, and whatever amp.

I mean, I get the argument. I have it with myself all the time. But at some point you've serve something nice, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LiquidMidnight
Some of you are intentionally taking this out of context just for argument sake.

For the OP's intended use, any reasonable DI is going to work ok for his application. I didn't say every application. I am also suggesting that often enough, I get an 810 rig coming through where it doesn't matter even a tiny bit what the DI is... why? Because the level off the stage is already more than I might want/need in the house, so there is ZERO bass in the PA.

Where I find that a better quality DI makes some difference is outdoors where there is heavy reliance on PA, and especially subs, where there is no constructive bundery reinforcement. Another place where it might make a difference is in larger theatres, and in venues where the stage volume is kept low and the PA reinforces without battling stage wash that muddies the mix up. The better the acoustic properties of the room, the more likely the difference might be.

In practice though, from what I see, there's not nearly as much fussing in the touring world about what DI is used as there is here on TB... imagine that ;)
 
Yes, so many bass players have been beaten down and humbled into feeling unimportant that they've lost all respect for themselves.

:D

At least bass players tend to show up on time and rarely forget to bring their own bass... ;)

These same arguments happen in pro audio too. To hear an engineer complain that he can't possibly get an acceptable mix on an industry standard Yamaha, or a Soundcraft or a Midas or an ATI or a (fill in the blank) is absurd as well. There are plenty of oustanding mixes by other engineers on ALL of these platforms.

Beware, when blame for poor performance is placed on tools that perform perfectly well by others, the craftsman/tradesman subjects themselves to some difficult comparisons.
 
I told some old live sound stories and complaints about many guys with hands that run house systems to a guitarist almost 1/2 of my years a junior. He though is was mostly an old guy slinging bull feces. He is now playing lead for an up coming country singer and finding it all true. Too many sound bodies these days try to emulate their car stereo annoying people for a 1/2 mile or more. No mixing or engineering within them.

He has now found a huge respect for a real sound engineer and had a couple stories that sounded like agedhorse or at least his caliber.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts