• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

‘78 Or Not?

I’ve never seen a Fender bass in the 70’s with those cheap 80’s style volume/tone knobs. Always hated those knobs!

No offense... then your lack of experience with later 70's Fender Jazzes is the problem. Those aren't 80's style knobs... they came out before the 80's. I had a TB Expert try to convince me that the OEM knobs on my 78 weren't stock. Because he didn't know any better.
:D

People didn't swap the earlier style knobs, they came from the factory like this. I never had a problem with them.
 
That's daylight robbery. I bought a 64 P and a 65 J each for less than that just a few years ago.
You can still pick up 70s fenders for ~2 grand and a bit and 80s for less than that.

I have a (admittedly beat to a pulp) 1977 Jazz. Didn't cost anywhere near that.

sure it’s expensive, it’s sat unsold for 10 months for a reason. but you can’t get nice 70s jazz basses for 2 grand where i live. here’s a 1973
Fender Jazz Bass
that’s 4600 canadian out the door. their stock does not sit around unsold for long.
 
My bass according to Fender's serial number is supposed to be a late-'77/early-'78 bass. Parts say it is a late '82 to early '83. My number starts with S 866, his is S 858814, which Fender can't find in its records. Mine has a 4-bolt neck, his is the three bolt "micro-adjust" pattern from the 70's. Looks like the part number on the first volume pot is R1378017, which if I recall correctly, means that pot was made in the 17th week of 1978 (late April of 1978). I have dot markers on my neck, he has the bar markers, which were common in the 70's.

I think the neck binding is pretty unusual for '78. They did that in '66 and again in '82 as a regular option, but perhaps it could be ordered as a separate option some years? My '82/'83 also has the binding but that's what the '82 Jazz called for. You'd think they would have cleaned up the instrument cord input though. It's rusty as hell.
137 = CTS 8017 = april 1980
lots of 78s have the bound neck. i own two 77 bound rosewood fretboard jazz bass necks (one is an all original 1977 jazz bass)
 
i bought a ' S9 ' P bass a few years back ... when i took it apart , the newest dated part was 1981 ( pots ) ... previous owner never took it apart , ... so selling it as a 1979 was kinda OK ... i bought it as such ... but as i earned more about how they were built in that era , it didn't bother me ... i sold it as a ' S9 ' , 1981 Pbass ... being a late 70's or early 80's model did not affect my pricing ..!!?? to be honest , my 1985 ' MIJ 75 RI ' Jbass was quite a bit nicer !??! during the last several years , i prefer to build my own from parts .!

View attachment 3766637 View attachment 3766640


speaking of parts build ... you would have liked my Avatar bass - first parts build ... " Toastie " 74 body/ 78 neck

IMG_2504.JPG
IMG_2514.JPG
IMG_2510.JPG
 
1. First, it is an undeniably cool bass with great mojo & good looks (minus the Strat knobs...easy fix).

2. If you needed a kidney, could you turn right back around and sell for that price?

3. Are you going to seal it, along with its OHSC, in a bag of nitrogen and keep it away from daylight for a few decades? Or are you going to leave it exposed to oxygen and play it once in a while?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
1. First, it is an undeniably cool bass with great mojo & good looks (minus the Strat knobs...easy fix).

2. If you needed a kidney, could you turn right back around and sell for that price?

3. Are you going to seal it, along with its OHSC, in a bag of nitrogen and keep it away from daylight for a few decades? Or are you going to leave it exposed to oxygen and play it once in a while?
1. Very true...the knobs don’t bother me at all...

2. I would not offer anything relatively close to what he’s asking for it....there’s already over a $1k difference between this bass and two others with comparable specs, just different colors...the color isn’t worth an extra grand to me, so he’d have to come down quite a bit for me to dance with him...

3. All my bass get put to use often....I see this one being no different..
 
Furthermore, everyone who had a "the neck gap is so and so" comment in this thread should actually leave their parents' house and audition for a gig, or play -or just talk to someone- someplace where there is no internet.

Here's a thread about neck walk on one of the most cutting-est edge manufacturers of bolt-on instruments today (and no disrespect to them at all). I guarantee this company has state of the art equipment, and by now has come up with incredible process control. And the neck *still* moves around in the pocket, regardless of how many phone books you can fit in the neck gap or not.

New bass, but neck looks off

It might not be visually pretty, but the "OMG undesirable Fender QC neck joint" comment needs to die. Maybe it starts with this thread?
 
Furthermore, everyone who had a "the neck gap is so and so" comment in this thread should actually leave their parents' house and audition for a gig, or play -or just talk to someone- someplace where there is no internet.

Here's a thread about neck walk on one of the most cutting-est edge manufacturers of bolt-on instruments today (and no disrespect to them at all). I guarantee this company has state of the art equipment, and by now has come up with incredible process control. And the neck *still* moves around in the pocket, regardless of how many phone books you can fit in the neck gap or not.

New bass, but neck looks off

It might not be visually pretty, but the "OMG undesirable Fender QC neck joint" comment needs to die. Maybe it starts with this thread?
It’s been a trendy thing to really generalize late ‘70s Fenders and bash them...again, I’ve never played a bad one...not one...
 
1. Very true...the knobs don’t bother me at all...

2. I would not offer anything relatively close to what he’s asking for it....there’s already over a $1k difference between this bass and two others with comparable specs, just different colors...the color isn’t worth an extra grand to me, so he’d have to come down quite a bit for me to dance with him...

3. All my bass get put to use often....I see this one being no different..

Re: point #2: This is good thinking.

Re: point #3: In the year 2020, if you are not a serious collector or the instrument is not your birthright, being into a Fender instrument over $1500 is a waste. (I used to say $1000, but now with inflation and all...) The gig circuit...and the rest of the world for that matter...is full of drunk people ready to send your bass flying, free of charge. If this bass isn't going to be mothballed for the visionaries (?) who realize the value (?) of these instruments, I would hard pass and make my own look-alike for 1/4 of the price.
 
It’s been a trendy thing to really generalize late ‘70s Fenders and bash them...again, I’ve never played a bad one...not one...

My dad still has his '74 Precision; it could handily compete in a "worst neck pocket of all time" contest. Despite being totally unplayable by today's internet standards, he used it to put food on the table by backing the flying Elvis trapeze/disco/wedding band circuit in the mid 70s in Chicago.
 
Last edited: