The only thing that makes a 1978 Fender cool or "vintage" is if you were not born yet.
Everyone who lived through those years wanted anything but a new Fender.....
Nonsense.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The only thing that makes a 1978 Fender cool or "vintage" is if you were not born yet.
Everyone who lived through those years wanted anything but a new Fender.....
Maybe it is a 70’s Fender. ;-)
True, not thinking straight. It’s like trying to turn on light switches after the power is out.
I’ve never seen a Fender bass in the 70’s with those cheap 80’s style volume/tone knobs. Always hated those knobs!
That's daylight robbery. I bought a 64 P and a 65 J each for less than that just a few years ago.
You can still pick up 70s fenders for ~2 grand and a bit and 80s for less than that.
I have a (admittedly beat to a pulp) 1977 Jazz. Didn't cost anywhere near that.
137 = CTS 8017 = april 1980My bass according to Fender's serial number is supposed to be a late-'77/early-'78 bass. Parts say it is a late '82 to early '83. My number starts with S 866, his is S 858814, which Fender can't find in its records. Mine has a 4-bolt neck, his is the three bolt "micro-adjust" pattern from the 70's. Looks like the part number on the first volume pot is R1378017, which if I recall correctly, means that pot was made in the 17th week of 1978 (late April of 1978). I have dot markers on my neck, he has the bar markers, which were common in the 70's.
I think the neck binding is pretty unusual for '78. They did that in '66 and again in '82 as a regular option, but perhaps it could be ordered as a separate option some years? My '82/'83 also has the binding but that's what the '82 Jazz called for. You'd think they would have cleaned up the instrument cord input though. It's rusty as hell.
137 = CTS 8017 = april 1980
lots of 78s have the bound neck. i own two 77 bound rosewood fretboard jazz bass necks (one is an all original 1977 jazz bass)
Yep. Calling that Very Good condition is a joke. But at least he’s posted enough pics to show the condition. 11 1/2 lbs? For that kind of money? Big nope.At that price point I would not expect rusty screws on the neck plate...I would go CS instead.![]()
i bought a ' S9 ' P bass a few years back ... when i took it apart , the newest dated part was 1981 ( pots ) ... previous owner never took it apart , ... so selling it as a 1979 was kinda OK ... i bought it as such ... but as i earned more about how they were built in that era , it didn't bother me ... i sold it as a ' S9 ' , 1981 Pbass ... being a late 70's or early 80's model did not affect my pricing ..!!?? to be honest , my 1985 ' MIJ 75 RI ' Jbass was quite a bit nicer !??! during the last several years , i prefer to build my own from parts .!
View attachment 3766637 View attachment 3766640
Yep. Calling that Very Good condition is a joke. But at least he’s posted enough pics to show the condition. 11 1/2 lbs? For that kind of money? Big nope.
the late 70s heavy jazz basses often sound amazing, particularly in the low end.That's a typical weight for that era.
the late 70s heavy jazz basses often sound amazing, particularly in the low end.
1. Very true...the knobs don’t bother me at all...1. First, it is an undeniably cool bass with great mojo & good looks (minus the Strat knobs...easy fix).
2. If you needed a kidney, could you turn right back around and sell for that price?
3. Are you going to seal it, along with its OHSC, in a bag of nitrogen and keep it away from daylight for a few decades? Or are you going to leave it exposed to oxygen and play it once in a while?
It’s been a trendy thing to really generalize late ‘70s Fenders and bash them...again, I’ve never played a bad one...not one...Furthermore, everyone who had a "the neck gap is so and so" comment in this thread should actually leave their parents' house and audition for a gig, or play -or just talk to someone- someplace where there is no internet.
Here's a thread about neck walk on one of the most cutting-est edge manufacturers of bolt-on instruments today (and no disrespect to them at all). I guarantee this company has state of the art equipment, and by now has come up with incredible process control. And the neck *still* moves around in the pocket, regardless of how many phone books you can fit in the neck gap or not.
New bass, but neck looks off
It might not be visually pretty, but the "OMG undesirable Fender QC neck joint" comment needs to die. Maybe it starts with this thread?
1. Very true...the knobs don’t bother me at all...
2. I would not offer anything relatively close to what he’s asking for it....there’s already over a $1k difference between this bass and two others with comparable specs, just different colors...the color isn’t worth an extra grand to me, so he’d have to come down quite a bit for me to dance with him...
3. All my bass get put to use often....I see this one being no different..
It’s been a trendy thing to really generalize late ‘70s Fenders and bash them...again, I’ve never played a bad one...not one...