• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

18" sub

Have played for about 10 years with this setup: Bag End 410, BE 15, Stewart WT 2.1, Alembic FX-1 pre-amp. Great sound & zero technical problems. I had always hoped to replace the 15 with a BE-18/Infra processor someday but it has become cost prohibitive. After trying my 410 with a friend's Peavey 18" sub, I was way impressed with the low end--- deep, smooth, solid as a rock-- although above mids there was a drop in volume. My question--- has anybody used the Peavey SP118 in their setup. Good? Bad? I will definitely play thru it before I buy but it seems like a relatively inexpensive alternative to the Bag End 18/Infra. Thanks.
 
I had always hoped to replace the 15 with a BE-18/Infra processor someday but it has become cost prohibitive.
I got a good price on the ELF (Infra) processor and BE 118, and they show up for a reasonable price from time to time in the used market. But that can take time. Ironically, my favorite 18" traditional sub is the BE S18B-D (the big 18" cab) it's a heavy (86 lb) big old sucker, but you can play it with the port covered or open and it is not muddy - huge, and you have to EQ your way out of boominess, but it sounds great set up correctly.

The ELF/INFRA approach is very cool and surprisingly lightweight (cab weighs less than 70 lb). But it requires the integrator and a dedicated amp channel (easiest if you are already in a preamp - stereo power amp configuration). The sound is a show-stopper, though. I keep trying to talk myself out of keeping mine - lots of shows with good PA support, more stuff to carry, etc. But nothing beats the ELF 118 with a Schroeder 1515+L on top for an outdoor or big room/no PA support show. :cool: