• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

1955 Fender Precision Bass

Just went and checked out Songbird's web site.

They're redoing the space and planning on opening back up in the fall!
I'll be there for the grand opening if it does happen.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

The floor plan doesn't look like it will have as many guitar displays. But the vault will remain intact it looks like.
 
I did not know they did string thru bodies back then. Couldn't find that detail in Gruhn's book, but in Geddy Lee's big beautiful book of bass, he has a 55 P bass that is not only string through, but the finish in front of the bridge is discolored in the same way. Interesting. Wonder what caused that. If you have the book it's on page 23.

I have a feeling his book is going to be a great resource for pictures. He's got a '52, '53, two '55s and a '56. Great resource I think.

The Fenders all had thru-body ferrules until '57, when the model changed.
 
That bass looks great but the problem with buying any of these vintage basses today is the word is out on how to duplicate finishes, initials and dating on these old Fenders. $25K is lot to blow on a fake and you never really know unless you have at least some provenance,
Those basses did come in blonde with black PG and Sunburst with white PG. Some early custom colors were done for the NAMM show that year. Green, Red and Shell Pink- Those are the collector's items.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
That bass looks great but the problem with buying any of these vintage basses today is the word is out on how to duplicate finishes, initials and dating on these old Fenders. $25K is lot to blow on a fake and you never really know unless you have at least some provenance,
Those basses did come in blonde with black PG and Sunburst with white PG. Some early custom colors were done for the NAMM show that year. Green, Red and Shell Pink- Those are the collector's items.
If I was going to shell out 25 grand for a vintage bass, it would have to come with some documentation/provenance of some kind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
This is my question also. There appears to be no difference in the paint under the pickguard and not under the pickguard. I might not have noticed that except for the non-faded paint under the bridge cover. There’s something here not adding up.

That blonde finish is how the bass would have looked when new. The idea that finishes "fade" is misleading. They don't fade and get lighter, they discolor and become darker from exposure to the environment, which was often smoky bars, etc. It's called "butterscotching".

If that bass was seldom played, kept in its case (which is original, btw) virtually forever, there's a good chance that the finish under the guard could still look the same as the rest of it. The overall wear seems consistent with a very seldom played, and well protected bass. The butterscotched area under the bridge cover is likely from foam mutes, as 2saddlebridge already pointed out. There is also some butterscotching on the arm contour, which could be from player sweat.

The two serial #'s is unusual but not unique, I've seen that before. And '55 is the transition year for serial #'s moving from bridge to the neck plate, which makes that particular bass more interesting to collectors. My 2-55 had only a bridge #, while my 4-57 had both bridge and neck plate numbers. Go figure.

Is that bass an original uber clean example?...is it an expert-level resto? No way to tell for sure by just looking at pictures because there are expert fakers out there who can fool the expert vintage guys, even Gruhn. I'd like to see some fine finish checking there, but that's not a for sure thing either.

Why is that dealer listing it on ebay, when there's little to no chance that anyone will pull the trigger, or even make a substantial offer? Advertising. Cheap advertising for his store that automatically creates a buzz all over the interwebz. His cost?....just the peanuts for the listing fee. If someone is crazy enough to pay the inflated ebay price he has in mind, then all the better and worth every penny of the additional associated listing costs. Brilliant!
 
It's not even close.

Here's the bridge from the thread you linked to.
View attachment 4167522

And here's the bridge on the bass in question...
View attachment 4167533

The top bridge is not only close, it's correct.

The top bridge is the same as the bridge on the '58 which was posted and was questioned. We weren't talking about the 2 saddle bridge on the SCPB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
There's only one bass mentioned or shown on the whole page.
He says it's a 64P in comment #1, and provides a pic of it in comment #3, definitely not stock. There's only one page of comments to go through, so not a lot of info on it.

And what brand are those pups?
View attachment 4167548

And Fender didn't make a P/J until the early 80s. So that bass, if it is a 64, has been highly modded.

Those are Seymour Duncan Active EQ pickups from the late eighties. I had a pair in my jazz bass. The switches are treble, mid and bass boost. Quite a good pickup.
 
Last edited:
What a joke! Here is a cherry '56 for 1/3 the price! Watch the video!

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Even though it's been refin'd, they did a pretty nice job on it. When it comes to old Fenders, original finish is a gigantic value variant. In the case of the uber nice '55, if its finish is original, that could easily double the value in "collectorworld".

Question; Is the refin'd '56 priced at $9000 really a better deal than an original A-1 grade '55 priced at $25K (OBO)? Neither look like a bargain to me.