• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

2--finger shredding?

Hey! Knock that off! Everyone knows that once you go over 80bpm 1/4 notes it no longer qualifies as music, and thus serves no purpose at all.
[/FACT]


But really,
@henry2513,
Do you consider anything played with speed "un-musical?" Including the likes of Django Reinhardt, Buddy Rich, J.S. Bach, etc, etc, etc... Or is it just bass that, according to your "rules," isn't allowed to be played fast. Honestly just curious as to why again, according to you, the instrument I chose to play out of the entire realm of instruments, apparently has this inherent speed limit, and why I was not notified of this by the employee at my local music shop upon purchasing my first bass. Maybe every bass coming off the assembly line should come with a warning sticker, "DO NOT EXCEED SUCH AND SUCH BEATS PER MINUTE UNDER PENALTY OF EXCESSIVE RIDICULE AND TROLLING!"

Nope, I play plenty fast myself, I'm a fanatic about building my technique etc and can do all that crap that's in this thread, but I've honestly never found myself in a situation where I've had to play that fast (16ths@ 200BPM) or have heard someone apply that type of speed during a bass solo and make it mean anything.

It's no feat to play that fast, playing fast and making it expressive or mean something is much more impressive, to me anyways.

From my perspective being able to play meaningful phrases using swung 1/8 notes at 240 BMP is much impressive.

Besides I wasn't trolling, just making an observation. Chill out buddy no one's attacking you ;)
 
Invalid Link Removed

Bass solo above starting at 0:40

I don't see how this twiddling is any more or less expressive than this twiddling.

Metallica - [Anesthesia] Pulling Teeth (Kill 'Em All) - YouTube

Or this:
Speed metal kills bass solo - YouTube


Why is it that speed can't, or has great difficulty, being musical and expressive?

(Really this is an actual question, I would like a reasonable explanation why speed is not considered musical)

Can you take a muscially slow piece, speed it up x4, without changing pitch, and it suddenly becomes not musical?

My brain moves much faster than it does slow. I don't feel the musical expression in a slow series of notes with arbitrary silence at random places. I get bored with it.


Headbanging to eighth notes at 120bpm just looks like you are nodding off to sleep.
 
Now that's what I'm talking about!!! :bassist:
He grooves, he plays musically, as fast as he needs to, and with amazing tone.

And if you want speed, show me somebody who can do this part with two fingers:
Invalid Link Removed

That's probably one of my favorite solo's that he's played.

I'm still working on his right hand technique, I've pretty well integrated it into my playing, except I've noticed that occasionally I'll slip back to two when I'm playing something completely brand new during a live performance.
 
Lol, listen to Gary's phrasing a little better. That's all I'll say on that.

I don't get it. His phrasing sounds like garbage.
He plays some - then he stops - then he plays some - then he stops - then he plays for a long time - then he stops – then everyone else plays.

Explain his phrasing to me. I want to understand. Why is what he does better, or more impressive, or more expressive than what those other two guys do?

I'll do it for Anesthesia:
Listen to Cliff's phrasing, and that’s not all I’ll say on that. He goes from part to part, phrase to phrase, balls to the wall, without having to stop and think about what he's doing. He doesn't let silence stop the flow of sound. There is action and spirit and movement flowing naturally and without hesitation from everything Cliff does in that track.

Cliff is playing bass. He is not playing bass, standing around for a while with a bass hanging from his neck, then playing bass some more. There is not a moment where time is wasted. There is not a moment that one part does not mesh with another. There is not a moment that you have time to breath.

It is emotional, expressive, liberating, and badass. The natural course of emotion is flowing. When a person you love dies, you are mad, then you are frightened then sad, then mad again, and on and on. You are not mad. Then nothing. Then sad. Then nothing. It is a flowing and morphing singular event and it is not bits and parts separated from each other.

If space and silence is what makes music expressive and wonderful, then why isn’t John Cage’s 4’33” the best selling single of all time?
 
Bass solo above starting at 0:40

I don't see how this twiddling is any more or less expressive than this twiddling.

Metallica - [Anesthesia] Pulling Teeth (Kill 'Em All) - YouTube
Technically this is elementary. Musically I find it pretty empty too but obviously that's just my opinion. The guitar-fuzz-wah tone is fun, but that's about it. I'm not a very fast player, and I could pretty much duplicate that with almost no practice.


That is just finger-wiggling. A deaf person with fast fingers could do that. :D


Why is it that speed can't, or has great difficulty, being musical and expressive?

(Really this is an actual question, I would like a reasonable explanation why speed is not considered musical)

Can you take a muscially slow piece, speed it up x4, without changing pitch, and it suddenly becomes not musical?
Speed is not musical OR unmusical. It's just a technique that can be used musically or not. Take a different technical detail, for instance playing high up on the neck. Is it musical? Well, it depends how it's used, just like speed or any other technique.

To take the Gary Willis example, he plays fast when he needs to play fast in order to make a musical statement.

I think the main reason that speed is considered unmusical is that when most people play fast, they are at the limit of their ability, so they can't pay attention to being musical. If your mind doesn't move faster than your fingers, it ends up just being a technical exercise. Any technique used inappropriately is unmusical.
 
A bass serves several goals. Some styles cannot just be compared.
The bass can be melodic: it is expressive, it speaks, it tells a story. Playing that way is the challenge of the right attack, the right sustain, playing staccato, legato, jumping from string to string, mixing some chords in and doing some harmonics. Mostly this has nothing to do with sheer speed. :cool:
The Rhythm section: following the drummer, mainly using roots and fifths, beating the crap out of the strings. Depending on style this can go pretty fast. :bassist:

My son asked me to play along with a melodic metal song with a beat of 185. I've to play triplets, four minutes long. This is kind of twelfth. I can do this pretty well with two fingers.
 
I don't get it. His phrasing sounds like garbage.
He plays some - then he stops - then he plays some - then he stops - then he plays for a long time - then he stops – then everyone else plays.

Explain his phrasing to me. I want to understand. Why is what he does better, or more impressive, or more expressive than what those other two guys do?

I'll do it for Anesthesia:
Listen to Cliff's phrasing, and that’s not all I’ll say on that. He goes from part to part, phrase to phrase, balls to the wall, without having to stop and think about what he's doing. He doesn't let silence stop the flow of sound. There is action and spirit and movement flowing naturally and without hesitation from everything Cliff does in that track.

Cliff is playing bass. He is not playing bass, standing around for a while with a bass hanging from his neck, then playing bass some more. There is not a moment where time is wasted. There is not a moment that one part does not mesh with another. There is not a moment that you have time to breath.

It is emotional, expressive, liberating, and badass. The natural course of emotion is flowing. When a person you love dies, you are mad, then you are frightened then sad, then mad again, and on and on. You are not mad. Then nothing. Then sad. Then nothing. It is a flowing and morphing singular event and it is not bits and parts separated from each other.

If space and silence is what makes music expressive and wonderful, then why isn’t John Cage’s 4’33” the best selling single of all time?
Unless someone would like to explain, I'm just sensing some emperor's new clothes business going on here. Gary is probably the better all around player, but I certainly preferred Cliff to his performance. It simply doesn't captivate me in any way. It just sounded like Gary would lay down little unsorted pockets of solos without any cohesion or direction, rest for a few beats, and do it again. Granted it WAS likely improvised, but it is what it is. Cliff's solo/song is very well organized. It begins with laying down a few chords, then moves into a very haunting set of arpeggios doing a great job of building up tension and resolving it with major chords, heads into some shredding, and then finally hits it hard home with some balls-out shredding with Lars. I'm not exactly sure why anyone would put Gary's solo over it. Not that it was a bad solo.
 
Unless someone would like to explain, I'm just sensing some emperor's new clothes business going on here. Gary is probably the better all around player, but I certainly preferred Cliff to his performance. It simply doesn't captivate me in any way. It just sounded like Gary would lay down little unsorted pockets of solos without any cohesion or direction, rest for a few beats, and do it again. Granted it WAS likely improvised, but it is what it is. Cliff's solo/song is very well organized. It begins with laying down a few chords, then moves into a very haunting set of arpeggios doing a great job of building up tension and resolving it with major chords, heads into some shredding, and then finally hits it hard home with some balls-out shredding with Lars. I'm not exactly sure why anyone would put Gary's solo over it. Not that it was a bad solo.

Like I said, really, really pay attention to Gary Willis's phrases and the musical statements he makes with them. Think call and response and you'll begin to gain a better understanding of what makes that a great solo and how all those "unsorted pockets, relate to each other. I wasn't able to get past his chops and appreciate his phrasing until I did ALOT of maturing as a player. All his solos are improvised btw.

Here's one of my favorites: Gary Willis - Say Never ( High Quality ) - YouTube


IMO a solo that isn't improvised is just an arrangement. It's not a solo anymore. All the originality and musical expression that goes with a solo is stripped out once you start pre-writing things.

It's like painting the mona lisa 800 times and calling the 10th or the 799th an original piece of art.
 
Oh yeah.

Imagine this, you play at 100 bpm using two fingers, each only hitting the string on the down stroke (hitting the string with the pad of your finger tip).

Now all you have to do (because it's so easy) is add an additional strike with your fingernail on the up stroke. Murderface does it a little different but it's the same idea.

Check out this video by Murderface (start at 3:40):
FPE-TV Bryan Beller William Murderface of Metalocalypse - YouTube

Thanx for the video & tip icecycle66!Really helpful...
 
Seems like i kickstarted a debate here :)

Truth is i've been playing with a pick all the time while using my middle finger for the occasional pop with my band.Recently i started utilizing slap riffs on a song that, at some point, goes into Thrash territory.Since i won't have the time to convert to plectrum in the mid of the song, i started practicing on 2 & 3 finger techniques & see how that goes.
In case i stick to these(& not the tip/fingernail approach which icecycle66 suggested-really eye opening i must admit!) i have one more question:Do i still rest my fingers on the previous string as i normally do during slower passages?