• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

3 string P bass? What's the story?

I think it would be really interesting to play a purpose-built 3 string. I feel like it would make you interact with those same 3 strings differently than you would with 4 strings in the equation. Might be a good training exercise, actually..


I have been experimenting with a modified bass. Yes, you do interact differently with the strings, especially by going up the neck more than you normally would. Also, by just being on 3 strings, you are keeping the scale pattern the same, root to octave (which is cool) and not worrying about the G string because its no longer there.
 

Attachments

  • gsr205msf.jpg
    gsr205msf.jpg
    614.2 KB · Views: 153
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: klokker and JRA
Tony Levin played a 3 because the funk fingers made it hard to hit the right string on a normal 4 - with only 3, the strings could be spread apart further. The photo above shows a 3 string upright - there were lots of uprights with different numbers of strings many years ago - 3 was a pretty common number if you go back far enough.

If I wanted to play a 3, I think I'd buy a narrow necked 5, and take 2 strings and their tuners (and bridge saddles) off, so I'd end up with wide spacing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klokker and zMark_F
(please see attached photo GSR205)
Tony Levin played a 3 because the funk fingers made it hard to hit the right string on a normal 4 - with only 3, the strings could be spread apart further. The photo above shows a 3 string upright - there were lots of uprights with different numbers of strings many years ago - 3 was a pretty common number if you go back far enough.

If I wanted to play a 3, I think I'd buy a narrow necked 5, and take 2 strings and their tuners (and bridge saddles) off, so I'd end up with wide spacing.

Hi Micguy. This is EXACTLY what I had done on a GSR205. I removed the B and G strings and kept it at (as Tony Levin said: "E,A,D of course") . I plugged the tuner holes up with black plastic caps. I also loosened the truss rod and raised the action slightly as the neck was no longer under as much tension. All of this could be put back to be a 5-string if needed without harm. Just experimenting.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0745.jpg
    IMG_0745.jpg
    552.1 KB · Views: 149
  • IMG_0748.jpg
    IMG_0748.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 173
Last edited:
Hi Micguy. This is EXACTLY what I had done on a GSR205. I removed the B and G strings and kept it at (as Tony Levin said: "E,A,D of course") . I plugged the tuner holes up with black plastic caps. I also loosened the truss rod and raised the action slightly as the neck was no longer under as much tension. All of this could be put back to be a 5-string if needed without harm. Just experimenting.

You kept the strings close to each other - I'd go for wide spacing using the B, A, and G tuners and string paths - abandoning the E and D. I have huge hands; close spacing is not my thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klokker
You kept the strings close to each other - I'd go for wide spacing using the B, A, and G tuners and string paths - abandoning the E and D. I have huge hands; close spacing is not my thing.
Oh okay, I get it now. That is a very good idea and still not requiring heavy mods to the instrument. Very cool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klokker

Latest posts