• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

32" scale basses

Brady Muckelroy builds some of the finest medium scale basses in the world.
4A2EB06B-2B3A-42E1-A385-72D60E13F466.jpeg
03853193-92D1-487E-8EAA-B35EA39C7DC7.jpeg
0376C9A4-2504-4FEA-A304-083D5E80B61E.jpeg
3928AA27-356E-423C-B7ED-C17F30E4FA16.jpeg
16FF3681-09FC-4E7B-AA92-E8A91DF7A14D.jpeg
 

Agreed!

I have two 32" scale Mucks.
Both ridiculously comfortable, stupidly light, and amazingly versatile.

In fact, all 5 of my basses are medium scale.
It's just the scale length that feels right, so I went all in.

Whatever works for you is best though.
For me, that's medium scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cutter8
The biggest problem is that there are not a lot of Medium scale strings. Neither of my favs - the Sunbeams or the TI Flats - are offered in 32".
It’s true, the medium scale string selection is smaller, but the good news is that TI’s so-called ‘short scale’ strings are really medium scale; the winding length is 35.5”.
 
I have a medium scale Jaguar PJ. I have trouble going back to long scale basses now. Short scales are cool, but they almost feel too small to me; like a toy.

I wish I could find a medium scale stingray, or just a medium scale bass with a MM humbucker.
Squier makes Medium scale Affinity Jag withh single MM humbucker and passive electronics.
 
I own a 32" Torzal headless and it's my go-to bass for longer gigs. I still prefer the feel of the 34" and I tend to play it a lot but the 32" solved all of the medical issues that I used to have.
The only downside to me is that playing in the upper register is not as comfortable as it is on a 34" bass.
 
I had a warmoth 32" fretless a while ago.

something about that size is just awkward for me. maybe i just have not seen any really nice ones. I have a student who plays a 32" p/j and i still think that size is just.. i dont know, weird for some reason..

30 feels like 30, 34, 35, they all have their "thing," and in fact 33" is my favorite.

I don't think many are being produced for that reason, 33" is just a more comfortable 34, and 30 is an "actual" short scale?
 
I've been wanting to try out a nice 32 inch scale bass, but I like to shop in the 450-700 bucks range and there are literally zero options. Hoping some company like Yamaha or Ibanez has some plans lying around, a medium scale BB or Talman would be awesome.
 
My first bass was a Rickenbacker 4001, which is 33.25" scale, so that feels "natural" to me. I was biased against 30" scale for a long time, associating it with things like an EB-3 with mudbuckers, but with the right strings and pups, I cant hear the difference. There are a lot of.Ibanez Mikro sub-short scale players on TB, and its totally viable. For people with smaller stature, hand,.wrist, or shoulder issues, etc., it can be a game changer. In some cases, its just the weight reduction people are after, the extreme version being something like a Hofner, which is like wearing nothing to play. I could easily see myself gravitating to a Hofner or Mikro as I get older and the weight and hand stretch get to be more of an issue.