• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

35" Scale question

M

MAJORdorMo

Aug 24, 2007
40
0
#1
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
I just got those plans in, and the 5 string neck is 34" scale.
To make it a 35" scale, would i just move the bridge up an inch, or do I need to change the fretboard's dimensions?
 
#6
....or return the MIMF plans and get what you paid for.

[rant]
NO COMPROMISES!!! Talking yourself into a compromise before you even start the build is (IMO) the first step down the road to an instrument that you may be less-than-satisfied with. Never ever settle for "eh...that looks good *enough*"

If you want 35".....demand the right plans!
[/rant]
 
#7
Does the MIMF have the plans with a 35" scale? I don't think they do... but at any rate, you should *always* look at a set of plans as a "guideline". They are never 100% to scale.

Do you want it to be 35" scale? Then make it so, and adjust the measurements necessary to do so (length of neck). So, you'd be adding ~.75" to the length of the neck. Big deal. You just adjust the plans to suit your individuality. The body would be the same, it's just that the neck would be .75" longer, and the bridge would be .25" further back on the body.
 
#8
You guys tell me after I realize the benefits of a 34" scale :rolleyes:
I am now wanting a 34" scale because many people have reported having a difficult time adjusting to the extra inch.
Since the only local music store only has 4 strings, I don't wanna risk having a bass I can't play comfortably.
 
#9
MAJORdorMo said:
You guys tell me after I realize the benefits of a 34" scale :rolleyes:
I am now wanting a 34" scale because many people have reported having a difficult time adjusting to the extra inch.
Since the only local music store only has 4 strings, I don't wanna risk having a bass I can't play comfortably.
Click to expand...

There is no overall "benefit" to 34" scale, any more than there is a "benefit" to 32" or 35" or 38" scale... there are only *differences*... the longer the scale, the more tension is required to tune up to a specific pitch. Therefore, a 35" 5-string will have higher tension for a given note, when using the same gauge strings as a shorter scale.

For 5 string, I would probably go 35", the difference is a total of 1" spread across the entire scale, or to better describe it, .5" spread from the nut to the 12th fret. *Not* that much difference to play on.
 
#10
SDB Guitars said:
For 5 string, I would probably go 35", the difference is a total of 1" spread across the entire scale, or to better describe it, .5" spread from the nut to the 12th fret. *Not* that much difference to play on.
Click to expand...

the biggest difference i would guess would be if youre playing a C major scale. on a 34 inch scale you would be stretching your hand 4.819 inches, on a 35 inch scale that stretch would be 4.961 inches, a difference of only 0.142 inches.

or 3.6 mm if youre in europe. :ninja:
 
#11
Mikey R said:
the biggest difference i would guess would be if youre playing a C major scale. on a 34 inch scale you would be stretching your hand 4.819 inches, on a 35 inch scale that stretch would be 4.961 inches, a difference of only 0.142 inches.

or 3.6 mm if youre in europe. :ninja:
Click to expand...

Yeah, that extra ~1/8" really kills some people.

On the other hand, that is only assuming you play "properly" and stretch your hand across 4 frets without moving your wrist. I am a reasonably ineffecient player, and never took lessons, so I always seem to move my wrist, and I almost never make a stretch of over 3 frets. Yeah, that's bad, I know... ;)
 
#12
SDB Guitars said:
Yeah, that extra ~1/8" really kills some people.
Click to expand...

i find the long 5ers combined with wider string spacing, like 19mm, are the ones that cause me the problems.

SDB Guitars said:
On the other hand, that is only assuming you play "properly" and stretch your hand across 4 frets without moving your wrist.
Click to expand...

on a 5er, you can normally play the same riff as on a 4 but one string down and 5 frets up :p
 
#14
No--the tension of the string is not affected by making it a string-thru bass. If the string tension were increased by making it string-thru, it would also be increased, by, say, leaving all the extra string wound on the peghead. What matter sis the length of the string between the nut and the saddle

Some people think the strings feel different with a string thru bass, but I never noticed a difference. String tension is a function of the mass of the string and the scale length. String "feel" is a function of the mass of the string and the construction method

I've been playing a Dingwall V for year now and I love it. But I used to have a 34 scale fender deluxe V that was an excellent bass. There's no reason a 34 scale low B can't be perfectly good--it depends on the bass, on your playing style, on the strings, etc.

If you make the MIMF Moll plans bass in to a 35 inch scale you'll have to refigure the fret placement
 
#16
I've built three basses from scratch and assembled a bunch of other ones and owned a bunch more. The one thing I've concluded is that it's practically impossible to tell what a bass is going to sound like based on the materials it's made from or the design/construction method. A lot of people disagree, but that's been my experience.

If I were you I'd go to guitar center and try as many fives as you can, and see what you tend to like. Try them unplugged and see how they sound/feel. It's just really hard to generalize. Some people like short scale basses. Some people find that the 35 scale is great for the low B but makes the G and the D feel too tight. Some people can't sand short scale basses--i never feel comfortable on them, but a friend of min sound great on 30 inch scale..

Changing the tension changes how the string "speaks." It's a big reason why Martin 25.5 scale acoustic sound different from Gibson acoustics or fender guitars sound and feel different from Gibsons. The advantage of the Dingwall, for me, is that the varied string scale makes the strings all feel the same--with most fives, the B feels pretty drastically different from the G no matter what the scale length

I used to spend a lot of time on the MIMF and I looked hard at the Moll bass plan. It's a really nice looking design. Over time I've usually ended up liking bolt neck basses that are very light and resonant. But it all changes when you change strings.

The only way to learn is just to do it. I don't build instruments any more, because I just decided it was better to leave it to people doing it full time. But I learned a ton and had a lot of fun.
 
#18
Yes, for the same set of strings, a 35" scale will have more tension tuned to the same pitch that a 34" scale. That doesn't necessarily mean it would be "better" to use lighter strings--the higher tension is what some people are looking for when they go to a 35" scale.

Mike
 
#19
I've owned both 34's and 35's. Your wrist is at a sharper angle in 1st pos with a 35 than a 34 and the finger spread is a longer stretch to boot. I have really small hands but I adjusted. After getting use to a 35 a 34 feels like a toy. I eventually went back to all 34's but would not hesitate to go with another 35 if one came available.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back