Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
38 lbs, 300 watts, all tube?!?
- Thread starter Stranger Danger
- Start date
It's a 300W tube head with a Toroidal transformer and switch mode power supply.
oof, spendy. I was thinking "man, this looks like my VB2" and the text then it says its a modded VB3. I love LOVE my VB2, and it weighs about the same and cost me $00 used, so I'll stick with it for now 
But still, I am glad to see Peavey resurrecting the VB line even a bit.
But still, I am glad to see Peavey resurrecting the VB line even a bit.
These were discontinued a few years ago.
Edit - just saw that they recently appeared available for pre-sale. Odd since they were announced in 2013, but good they're back I guess?
oof, spendy. I was thinking "man, this looks like my VB2" and the text then it says its a modded VB3. I love LOVE my VB2, and it weighs about the same and cost me $00 used, so I'll stick with it for now
But still, I am glad to see Peavey resurrecting the VB line even a bit.
VB2 has big iron transformers, the VB3 does not. I played the regular, non-Michael Anthony version and I was not impressed. I've owned multiple 300W tube heads so I think I have a good base for comparison - the VB3 just seemed a bit anemic and weak to me.
I'm the proud owner of a VB3. When I bought it seven years ago, I hesitated for a while as I really dislike EL34 tubes for bass. I was definitely intrigued by the SMPS power supply and weight factor. After I bought it I tried 6L6's as the amp is set up with a bias switch to use that tube. I still wasn't happy. I was able to correspond with Bobby Baldwin, the designer of the amp. He nixed my idea of using 6550's, but heartily recommended a set of EHX 6CA7 big bottle tubes. I did it even though I was getting tired of pouring money into all these tubes. It definitely made a huge (positive to my ears) difference. It will never be an SVT in terms of girth and tone, but I do like for the most part, what it does well. Peavey should have shipped the amp with these tubes.
Pros:
Real tube stank. The weight or lack of, for sure. The universal supply voltage; important for me, decent tone stack, pretty good compressor and overdrive when used carefully. And my favorite - the resonance and presence controls. They take a bit of fiddling but are the key to some really useful tones.
Cons:
I will always wonder what a set of 6550's would sound like. The overdrive channel should be blendable with the clean channel. Lose the graphic EQ. The cooling fan on the top is begging for a beverage to be spilled into it.
Lastly, I somewhat agree with the earlier poster on the lack of cajones.
I that think this might be the output transformer being a bit on the small side. Probably to save both weight and money.
As usual YMMV.
Pros:
Real tube stank. The weight or lack of, for sure. The universal supply voltage; important for me, decent tone stack, pretty good compressor and overdrive when used carefully. And my favorite - the resonance and presence controls. They take a bit of fiddling but are the key to some really useful tones.
Cons:
I will always wonder what a set of 6550's would sound like. The overdrive channel should be blendable with the clean channel. Lose the graphic EQ. The cooling fan on the top is begging for a beverage to be spilled into it.
Lastly, I somewhat agree with the earlier poster on the lack of cajones.
I that think this might be the output transformer being a bit on the small side. Probably to save both weight and money.
As usual YMMV.
