TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I've been faced with this same choice as I plan to trade up to lighter speaker cabinets.
The economic argument is in favor of the 410. Stick to one manufacturer and product line, and one of the 410s is cheaper than 2 of the 210s.
The modularity argument is in favor of the 2x210. For something small, just bring the 210, for a larger gig bring both.
The portability argument will depend on you and your situation and the cabs you're looking at.
The sound argument can also boil down to the individual cabs you're looking at, and I'll let people wiser than me in such things discuss it.
+1 on all counts. And you can't leave half of a 410 at home when you don't need it.Typically the two 210 cabs can go deeper a bit better than the 410 because there is a bit more internal cab volume per speaker.
Two 210 cabs vertically aligned will allow for better dispersal of mids. With the 410, each vertical alignment of tens will cancel some frequencies out at various points relative to you and the cab placement.
Two 210's stacked vertically also place the top speakers closer to your ears making it easier to hear yourself.
Two 210's are more modular and with each one being lighter than one 410, easier to move. Also a 410 is harder to fit in some vehicles.
Any one speaker damaged in a 210 will still allow you to use the other 210. If you blow one speaker in the 410, the others may follow suit soon.
I don't see much advantage to a 410 versus two 210's except perhaps price.
Lot's of good advice and insights offered already, so I'll add my perspective in brief.
I have 2x210 (Epifani) AND an Epifani UL1 410. The possibilities are very cool.
210: (either UL1 or NYC) 8 ohm, One carry with Shuttle 6.0 and 2 basses in a Mono duo backpack.
2x210: major booty, two carries. Loud loud loud.
410: (4 ohm) Loud and elegant. Takes up less total space than 2x210 in my Elantra Touring wagon.
210 + 410: Loud booty badness---but when you need it, you got to have it.
I have ventured no further.
If I had to choose, I would probably take an 8 ohm 210 and a 4 ohm 410. Each driver gets equal power. However, I am somewhat addicted to the 2x210 booty, i.e., superior low end and low mid response.![]()
Typically the two 210 cabs can go deeper a bit better than the 410 because there is a bit more internal cab volume per speaker.
Two 210 cabs vertically aligned will allow for better dispersal of mids. With the 410, each vertical alignment of tens will cancel some frequencies out at various points relative to you and the cab placement.
Two 210's stacked vertically also place the top speakers closer to your ears making it easier to hear yourself.
Two 210's are more modular and with each one being lighter than one 410, easier to move. Also a 410 is harder to fit in some vehicles.
Any one speaker damaged in a 210 will still allow you to use the other 210. If you blow one speaker in the 410, the others may follow suit soon.
I don't see much advantage to a 410 versus two 210's except perhaps price.
Yup, everything you've mentioned is currently what I'm thinking over. Eden 2x210XST (or 1 xst and 1 xlt )
or Eden 410XST
Sure is quite a bit cheaper for the 410...
for best results, lining up the cones evenly is the way to go. makes a slight difference but a noticeable one imho.