• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

6 strings with these specs?

Ibanez ANB306 was one of the nicest feeling and sounding 6 strings I have played, regardless of price class. Its 18mm, 34 inch scale, D Profile etc. But two truss rods, neck through and they tend to weigh around 5 KGs. Amazing bass though!

thanks, I forgot about these too… yeah, some specs are off for my preference and at the top of the price range, but worth considering!
 
I've owned a BTB, the first single cut they made. I think the full name is BTB686sc Terra Firma.
I could swear that this one had 18 or 19mm string spacing. Being used to this bass and touching the SR instantly calls up an uncomfortable feeling because of the narrow string spacing.

The neck is wide and flat. It's well within budget, but it has two truss rods.

thanks, I’ll put it on my radar! Specs online say 17mm, but I wonder if earlier models may sometimes have slightly different specs? Or maybe they feel wider due to other factors…
 
Personally I wouldn't be concerned with the number of truss rods. Two is better than zero.
I've never owned a double rod. What do you do? If I turn one a quarter turn I turn the other a quarter turn?
It's like my twins?

my understanding is they can be finicky to adjust in tandem… you may end up twisting the neck, or have one disengaged and rattling in the neck, etc… but yeah, if other things worked well, id be fine with a double rod I guess.
 
yeah, I’m one of the people picky about the weirdest things :D or, as I like to think of it, who have refined tastes :cool: a couple mm more here, a few mm less there, and the thing is almost unplayable to me… I love Yamaha, but TRBs are out unless they vary from model to model. I tried one in a shop so not sure what model exactly, but it felt rather chunky, yeah, and for sure the nut width was too narrow for me… will try to try more in the future…

Maybe this helps? Best 6-String Bass Under k???
By the way I play a 15 and 14mm spacing 6 string bass. So I think 17mm is already too wide....:) So I understand, each his own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snert
Maybe this helps? Best 6-String Bass Under k???
By the way I play a 15 and 14mm spacing 6 string bass. So I think 17mm is already too wide....:) So I understand, each his own.

thanks! Looking at that thread, seems like Matt Pulcinella basses might be a good fit for me… never heard of these basses before, so I have some homework to do :)

I may end up getting an Ibanez and see if I get used to tighter string spacing… would sure open up some good options if I stick with the 6 string!
 
I'm going to be watching this thread curiously. Mostly because I see the thin neck with wide string spacing requirement as a combination that is in the fringes of bass design.

I suspect that this is so because as the neck gets wider, making the neck stiff enough to handle the added stresses of more strings requires something extra. Possibly this is the reason some mfrs. opt for for dual truss rods. An obvious design choice would be to make the neck chunkier. Of course adding strengthening rods inside the neck might also help, but as you make the neck thinner, there is a limit to how little wood can contain the rods themselves.

On a side note, I'm curious why someone with hands large enough to handle 6 wide spaced strings would have an issue with a chunkier neck than what you find on an SR. Different strokes for different folks for sure, but I am guessing that this combination of specs is not something often requested. Custom might wind up being the best/only way of getting them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scott sinner
yeah, specs are 16.5, adjustable up to 17 or so… I thought about swapping a bridge to get some more mm out, but was worried about strings getting too close to the edge of the neck. Do you have any problems with that? Any chance you’d post a pic?
Since you quoted me, I'll reply as my previous post was only to point out a technical spec error in the SR basses.

I think the adjustable spacing is a bit of a gimmick, unless you're going narrower, and then you're limited by the neck width, and have posted this before. But I have no problem with narrower spacings as I can play guitar and my SRC6 which has the same spacing and chunkier strings. I'm sorry, but I don't get the need for something specific as I can adapt, same as I can drive a Lotus Elise and a Dodge Ram 2500.

My own preferences for what I play musically is actually to go a but narrower at the bridge, with a corresponding narrower neck and my ideal custom would be a hybrid of a Bass VI class and an SR 6 string like a GVB36 or an EBMM Petrucci. These are hard to find and out of my budget at the moment, so I'll adapt and stick with my current herd of SRs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sikamikanico
This might be a long shot because several of your desired specs are off, but I currently have a '93 Vantage 960BA 6 string bass for sale in the TB classifieds that I have priced at less than $500 all in.

I'm mentioning this to you because even though some of your requirements aren't met with this bass, the price is so low that you might be able to experiment with a very affordable 6 stringer to see if it's for you, without having to invest $1,500 - $2,000 in a new instrument that you might not like.

I won't link to the ad here, but if you're interested, just PM me and I'll get you all the info, or else you can just do a search for "Vantage 960BA" in basses for sale.

Regardless, good luck with your quest!
 
  • Like
Reactions: sikamikanico
  • 1 truss rod. I might consider 2 truss rods as I'm not necessarily looking for a "forever bass", but I really don't want to mess with 2 and as far as I can tell they're not really needed, especially with a 3+ piece neck...

Necks change shape due to stresses. There are 2 sources of stress:

1) Internal stresses in the wood - over time, even without strings on the bass or torque from the truss rod, if there are internal stresses, the neck will warp - and in an unpredictable direction.

2) Stresses from the strings or truss rod. The strings pull it one way, the truss rod the opposite way. If those forces are balanced, the neck will stay put.

The type of wood in the neck and the cross section and length of the neck affect its stiffness, which, under a given amount of stress, determines how far it will move. Stiffer is better. A thicker neck is stiffer. A shorter neck is stiffer (one place where a 35 inch scale works against you).

Making a neck multiple pieces helps mitigate #1 - if the grain directions are managed properly, it helps with that. It does not, however, make the neck stiffer or help with #2. On a 6 string, that might be an issue. That's why many of them have dual rods. My point is that your logic of a 3 piece neck not needing dual rods is not correct - the two have nothing to do with each other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sikamikanico
I'm interested in getting a 6 string to give it a go. That said, I'm really picky on the specs, particularly around the neck. Over the past several months, I've been trying to try everything I can and I think these are the most critical specs for me:
  • 18mm+ bridge spacing (17.5mm maybe)
  • ~54mm+ nut width
  • thin neck profile (I think D profile?)
  • 1 truss rod. I might consider 2 truss rods as I'm not necessarily looking for a "forever bass", but I really don't want to mess with 2 and as far as I can tell they're not really needed, especially with a 3+ piece neck...
I'm mostly interested in bolt-ons, 34"+ scale, and in a $1500 range, maybe $2k.

These are some of the basses that come close. It seems like Tune may be my best bet, tho I haven't found any to try yet.
View attachment 5164049

Some impressions from my tests: I found Sire and Dingwall necks too chunky, but I did try the 5 string versions, not 6 stringers. I really like Ibby SR necks, but bridge spacing is just too narrow. I have once played a 5 string MTD Kingston, but don't recall how it felt in my hand (probably good enough), so I think asymmetric profiles may work for me too. I didn't bond with a Yamaha TRB 6 string and I think it was the narrow nut width that bothered me the most. The wider TRBJP models are out of my price range. I don't know if all TRB 6 string models had the narrower 50mm spacing in the past?

Any other basses out there to consider?
Wide spaced 6 strings inevitably end up having wide necks with very flat fingerboards. This can present problems for chordal playing unless you have Felix Pastorius sized hands (but he plays a 33” scale) I spent 3 years playing an Ibanez Gerald Veasley bass with 14mm spacing that I never got fully comfortable with, but it had an amazing neck. The 16.5 spacing with SR basses is a good compromise allowing a very comfortable neck and a radiused fingerboard. The BTB basses have a slightly fatter, flatter neck but the sharp edges on the body are atrocious.
I’m just gonna leave this here….
For Sale - Ibanez SR 1346b
 
  • Like
Reactions: sikamikanico
yeah, specs are 16.5, adjustable up to 17 or so… I thought about swapping a bridge to get some more mm out, but was worried about strings getting too close to the edge of the neck. Do you have any problems with that? Any chance you’d post a pic?
Here you go.
IMG_0111-865x1385.JPG
 
  • Like
Reactions: sikamikanico
something of note: as dingwall 6'ers get more expensive, their necks get thinner.
back-to-back compairing; NG, ABZ, and Z necks, the NG feels like a baseball bat.
if you could find a good used deal on a ABZ 6 string and are comfortable with the multi-scale, the neck will be noticably different from a combustion/NG2/3.

Have you tried out the LTD B-206SM? played one years ago in a shop and its neck has always stuck with me as slim, wide but not too wide, and easy to play. got no idea on the string spacing but after a quick search i found someone saying they'd installed a new bridge giving them 17mm spacing. the pickups and preamp should be easy to replace if you do that sorta thing and find the stock ones offensive, but they should be ok. it's 35 not 34 but to some extent, that can be partially solved with string selection.

another, more expencive, option would be Maruszczyk custom shop. if you dont go crazy with options you should be able to get what you want for about 2k (this suggestion might be null if you're outside of europe, idk what shipping and conversions and insurance would be?).

used post-2009 CS warwicks 'should' have a thinner (not 'the warwick' neck) profile by default. i believe the rockbass 6'ers have the same default. i've read somewhere that people have pushed the adjustable bridge out to 17mm on their warwick 6'ers - so maybe thats a possibility.
 
I'm going to be watching this thread curiously. Mostly because I see the thin neck with wide string spacing requirement as a combination that is in the fringes of bass design.

I suspect that this is so because as the neck gets wider, making the neck stiff enough to handle the added stresses of more strings requires something extra. Possibly this is the reason some mfrs. opt for for dual truss rods. An obvious design choice would be to make the neck chunkier. Of course adding strengthening rods inside the neck might also help, but as you make the neck thinner, there is a limit to how little wood can contain the rods themselves.

On a side note, I'm curious why someone with hands large enough to handle 6 wide spaced strings would have an issue with a chunkier neck than what you find on an SR. Different strokes for different folks for sure, but I am guessing that this combination of specs is not something often requested. Custom might wind up being the best/only way of getting them.

after playing a few 5ers and 6ers, I learned that wide and flat works better for me. I play them differently than a 4 string, more like a classical guitar. Indeed, I care less for the extra notes that they give, but I like how they open new positions and shapes.

I dont know about the mechanics of neck construction, but I figure if Ibanez can do a thin wide neck, it’s doable with modern production techniques… indeed, they make a few in 18 mm spacing, but then other specs and or price are off for me…

I suspect that most folks simply prefer narrower spacing, which is understandable, and so most basses have that. Higher priced models offer a lot more, but I’m not committed to 6 yet…
 

Latest posts