• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

864 mm / 34" vs 889 mm / 35"

I have owned 34", 35" and 36" basses, but I have never felt that the playability differed. Yes, as has been mentioned, the tension can help - especially the feel of the B-string, but I have never felt a difference in term of distance between the frets, though it's obviously there :-)

EDIT: Also, I have heard some people state that the sound of the G-string changes once you get above 34", but I have never noticed that on any of my long-scale basses neither.
 
I noticed the increase in string tension WAY more than the slight increase in distance between frets. For me the increased tension was a big positive, but not everybody likes it.

If you like low action, the high tension often allows for lower action, which balances out the effort, IMHO.

Does anyone play 889 mm basses?

How much more of a stretch do they feel compared to a 864, when playing in the F# major scale say, on the E string, finger per fret?

Cheers!

Keep in mind, you can play the F# major scale on the 7th fret of the low B and it's a significantly shorter stretch than playing it on the E string. ;)
 
I noticed the increase in string tension WAY more than the slight increase in distance between frets. For me the increased tension was a big positive, but not everybody likes it.

+1, especially on the B string.

If you like low action, the high tension often allows for lower action, which balances out the effort, IMHO.

+1
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spectre Gunner

Latest posts