• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

90s Peavey Foundation

Back in the 80s, I played bass in clubs and remember that Peavey Foundation basses were popular. Recently, I wanted a back up and bought a 93 Foundation and found it it be a solid axe but have read that the 90s model are well thought of and I’m was wondering why… especially since the one I bought is fairly comparable to my Fender Jazz?
 
Never thought too much of T-40 tone variations.

I've never really heard the mythical sound of angels.

T60 yes... t40 never.


-----

Late Single Coil vs Ferrite
I've own both... I can not hear the differenentiator.

yea, crusty... I played a gig on Saturday night with a $40 bass... the sound guy was a bass player, thought I was playing a botique then went on to pontificate what a difference a quality bass makes.

No, I did not tell him the round wounds were 30 years old and the bass what many of us pooopoo about.

------

Peavey Reputation

They had a strange history of selling instruments marketed toward students and gigging people.. then there was a short period where they marketing misfired selling high end stuff under the peavey name. Did not learn from Lexus/Acura ... I'll put my peavey stuff up against my nerdy botiques any day.
 
have read that the 90s model are well thought of
Was this supposed to say “aren’t” well thought of? It’s seems the replies have interpreted this statement both ways (are & aren’t).

Some of the later 90s peavey basses started showing signs of cost cutting on material and a little on workmanship also (sharp fret ends and such). I remember playing some Foundation 5 strings that weren’t too slick, but I’m not sure they weren’t some of the first built outside the US. I had an ‘83 I bought new and then traded it for a new ‘87 Foundation “S” that I still have. Both great basses and the ‘87 still is…
 
Was this supposed to say “aren’t” well thought of? It’s seems the replies have interpreted this statement both ways (are & aren’t).

Some of the later 90s peavey basses started showing signs of cost cutting on material and a little on workmanship also (sharp fret ends and such). I remember playing some Foundation 5 strings that weren’t too slick, but I’m not sure they weren’t some of the first built outside the US. I had an ‘83 I bought new and then traded it for a new ‘87 Foundation “S” that I still have. Both great basses and the ‘87 still is…
Yeah, it was supposed to say “aren’t” rather than “are. “ Tried to edit it but couldn’t. It seems I dodged a bullet in that I bought a 93 which still had the super ferrite pups. The neck is very comfortable although there’s a couple of small gouges in the face of the fretboard which don’t affect the playability. Overall, I’m extremely well pleased would put it on equal par against my Fender Jazz. It is a very high quality instrument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rok51