• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

A call for STANDARDIZATION

Lonnybass

Lonnybass

Jul 19, 2000
5,683
11,378
48
San Diego
Disclosures
Endorsing Artist: Pedulla Basses
#1
An open letter to pedal manufacturers...

You've already agreed that 1/4" jacks are the way to go. Now, can you all agree on a common layout for the following:

1) Input/Output Jack placement - so that patch cables can be connected easier and more efficiently

2) Height of the Jack From the Bottom of the Pedal - so that you can easily utilize dual male connector plugs and have everything be at the same level.

3) Power plug location - so that it's in a CONVENIENT place and not getting in the way of patch cables located right next to the adapter.

I can't tell you how much time I have wasted trying to work around patch and power connection designs on my effects board that are either inconvenient or just plain dumb. Come on guys, you can figure this one out!

Lonnybass
 
#3
I agree ... My frustration has reached volcanic levels at times. On the other hand, I could see companies like MXR thinking "just use all MXR pedals, problem solved." Although the location of the adaptor plug on MXR pedals is a definite curiosity ... I can't figure out any advantage to having it on the side.
 
#4
I like having a bunch of different options for jacks. Sometimes the biggest factor when choosing a pedal is size. Look at my board for instance, I wouldn't be able to fit them all on with all top jacks.

1358200800.jpg
 
#5
erigod23 said:
Yeah, but one man's genius might be another man's dumb.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Honestly, as many small manufacturers as there are in the effects field its amazing there's as much standardization as there is. The voltage pump only came out a few years ago, and since then a number of pedals that otherwise wouldn't have are now conforming to the 9 volt standard.

There's been long debates about side jacks versus top jacks with no clear winner. How is somebody supposed to come up with a standard when no two people want the same thing?
 
#10
Jeez, what brought out the antipedal crew?

If a few boutique guys settled on a standard the rest could follow along. Bear with me.....

Ideally far side in and out would be great but since most pedals have their inputs and outputs on the side it would be fruitless to challenge that.

Every pedal goes right to left with the signal chain, one box checked....

Boss pedals have the power on the back side, adopt, solved...

The major conflict is the lack of an offset to the in and out. It could be a standard top left bottom right or vice versa and all would be well for everyone. Not much of an ask really.

But the boutique guys that figured out rear side rules would be out of step. Sad but they would catch up in a flash if the mass production guys had an actual standard nearly as useful.
 
#11
And that's where Boss really sucked things up. Whatever side has a jack is going to need space for what plugs into the jack. So it's pretty obvious limiting all the jacks to one side saves space. Even the drummer to Nickelback could figure that one out. Having the input, output, and power jacks all on different sides wastes space on three sides instead of just one.

So the universal answer should be that all jacks go on the same side. Which leads to top jacks.....since it would be just odd to have all three (or more) holes on just the right or left.

BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE!!!! Most people keep their boards at the front of the stage and amps in the back. Which means that top mounted jacks are stupid in that our instrument cables lose length by having to go past the pedals and then double back.......ergo.....BOTTOM MOUNTED JACKS!!!!!!

It's clearly the civilized answer but no one does it. Barbarians.
 
#13
I feel your pain my friend!
I think is unlikely to achieve any further standardization, mainly due to the fact that when designing we engineers have to consider so many variables and factors!
The size of the circuit, amount of controls for example!
When designing my pedals I could have had all jacks on the top side but at the price of having to use bigger chassis. I believe that low footprint and portability are more important, but others might (actually some always) disagree.

On a positive note, I think sometimes the lack of rules and standardization make more innovation possible... it lets the creators play and push the envelope a bit further every time.

Just my 2 cents ;).
Regards, Doug.
 
#19
MSUsousaphone said:
And that's where Boss really sucked things up. Whatever side has a jack is going to need space for what plugs into the jack. So it's pretty obvious limiting all the jacks to one side saves space. Even the drummer to Nickelback could figure that one out. Having the input, output, and power jacks all on different sides wastes space on three sides instead of just one.

So the universal answer should be that all jacks go on the same side. Which leads to top jacks.....since it would be just odd to have all three (or more) holes on just the right or left.

BUT WAIT THERE'S MORE!!!! Most people keep their boards at the front of the stage and amps in the back. Which means that top mounted jacks are stupid in that our instrument cables lose length by having to go past the pedals and then double back.......ergo.....BOTTOM MOUNTED JACKS!!!!!!

It's clearly the civilized answer but no one does it. Barbarians.
Click to expand...

You are one sharp cookie MSU, but in this instance no cigar. Bottom mounted jacks would get trampled by people with clumsy feet (like me) when trying to engage or disengage the pedals. Fitting the jacks into the pedal housing where the footswitch is would also present design problems, possibly leading to bigger pedals and pedals with the foot switches up in the mid-body area of the pedal.

I don't see bottom-mounted jacks as an idea waiting to explode.
 
#20
Methinks you may have missed his sarcasm.

HolmeBass said:
You are one sharp cookie MSU, but in this instance no cigar. Bottom mounted jacks would get trampled by people with clumsy feet (like me) when trying to engage or disengage the pedals. Fitting the jacks into the pedal housing where the footswitch is would also present design problems, possibly leading to bigger pedals and pedals with the foot switches up in the mid-body area of the pedal.

I don't see bottom-mounted jacks as an idea waiting to explode.
Click to expand...
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back