• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

A Guide to Good Ken Smith Slap Tone

I've been sitting here setting up my Smith today, so this is interesting. I saw how he backed off the gain and so did the guy in the second video. In the second video it looks like he has the treble and mid in the detent with the mids actually boosted a touch. It is tough to tell though. I guess these guys back off the volume because they are boosting the low end.

All I can say is I much prefer the second video. Pulling all of the mids out of a Ken Smith just does not do it for me, and I just tried it. I honestly love the Smith with everything centered, but I am going to try boosting the mids a hair and see how that goes.

As for the slap tone, I have a Sadowsky J and I love both slap tones. The Sadowsky is of course amazing, but anyone who listened to a lot of fusion back in the day knows that Smith slap tone, especially when popping the C. It sounds so good in a mix. It is just different, but to me it is still a top tier slap tone. That is one reason why so many gospel/funk/R&B players use them.

Of course the low B on these basses is insanely good, which is another reason. I prefer it to my Sadowsky, and I love the Sadowsky B. But the Smith has so much definition in every note. A jazz bass is going to be more sizzly.
 
Not a fun of his tone honestly and with the band it will be muddy, Bordering on BS putting the KS as "very professional" as he says. A passive jazz bass should deliver an acceptable slap sound that can be enhanced with a maybe a decent 2 band EQ
A Ken Smith can sound great in band if the eq emphasizes the strong midrange that is the foundation of its tone. For scooped, a Jazz would be 100% better.
 
I don't usually cut the mids on my active jazz or my stingray HH , but I do boost the bass when slapping. Treble it depends.

I think smiths, pj's and Warwicks have a "ping" tone when slapping which isn't very authoritative , and sounds a little keyboard like. They don't have the boldness or elegance of a jazz bass slap tone.

As for "cutting through the mix" I think that's contextual to the part and the ensemble. slap works best with sparse arrangements. Forget me not would not cut with two guitarists in the way.
 
sounds a little keyboard like.
Thats exactly why the Smith rules. There are a million jazz basses out there if you want the standard slap sound. But the Smith can compete with a bass synth better than any bass I have ever owned, due to its voicing. Just matters the sound and style you like. I produce electronic music and play fusion so I pull out the Sadowsky for when I want that scooped slap tone or a more traditional sounding bass. The Smith just fits in a lot more of my music where I used to employ a synth instead. I have no idea if this is true, but I feel like when he designed these basses he wanted to give bass players an instrument that could compete with the synths out there. Whatever the case, it works. You hit a low C on a synth and it just delivers. The slap indeed sounds like a DX7 or ROMpler slap sound, and that's what I love about it.
 
Thats exactly why the Smith rules. There are a million jazz basses out there if you want the standard slap sound. But the Smith can compete with a bass synth better than any bass I have ever owned, due to its voicing. Just matters the sound and style you like. I produce electronic music and play fusion so I pull out the Sadowsky for when I want that scooped slap tone or a more traditional sounding bass. The Smith just fits in a lot more of my music where I used to employ a synth instead. I have no idea if this is true, but I feel like when he designed these basses he wanted to give bass players an instrument that could compete with the synths out there. Whatever the case, it works. You hit a low C on a synth and it just delivers. The slap indeed sounds like a DX7 or ROMpler slap sound, and that's what I love about it.
The “ping” is the thing!
 
A passive jazz bass should deliver an acceptable slap sound that can be enhanced with a maybe a decent 2 band EQ
“I like the way he thinks!”

1743970938520.jpeg


😊
 
Thats exactly why the Smith rules. There are a million jazz basses out there if you want the standard slap sound. But the Smith can compete with a bass synth better than any bass I have ever owned, due to its voicing. Just matters the sound and style you like. I produce electronic music and play fusion so I pull out the Sadowsky for when I want that scooped slap tone or a more traditional sounding bass. The Smith just fits in a lot more of my music where I used to employ a synth instead. I have no idea if this is true, but I feel like when he designed these basses he wanted to give bass players an instrument that could compete with the synths out there. Whatever the case, it works. You hit a low C on a synth and it just delivers. The slap indeed sounds like a DX7 or ROMpler slap sound, and that's what I love about it.
Great point. I think they are awesome basses. And I think there are great applications for those tones.

I’m actually not a “tone” guy. I like all kinds of sounds for different jobs. I have a preference or two, but they might not always work. I bet what you’re doing sounds pretty good.
 
The "ping" is the thing!
I respect that for sure. Everything is a trade.

What I like about the Jazz bass is, that the d and g strings, when slapped, still have a lot of low end. They still function as bass notes. I don’t know if that makes sense. Entire bass lines can be played that way a la Marcus. The ping loses some of that fatness and strength to me. I’m sure exceptions could be brought up!