• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Active or Passive Bass - Which do you Prefer?

Active or Passive?

  • Active

    Votes: 61 36.5%
  • Passive

    Votes: 106 63.5%

  • Total voters
    167
I think I've always used active basses. I've had a couple of passive ones, but most of the time they don't get used when there is an active alternative. I do like the ability to switch to passive if the battery dies, but I've never had that happen at a gig.
 
my main bass is active, and it does everything i want it to do (its a Lakland 44-02) Doesnt mean i dislike passive basses though, when i play in my 50's cover band i prefer to use a passive P bass.

I guess i choose active coz its more useful to me personally.
 
Ive owned 2 of each. I ended up recently loosing my feelings toward active. it just has a kind of dullness to it that i cant really describe. its a must have on my 6 string for sure. but i may soon be heading back to the 4 string game. Passive pickups just always give me the punch and snap that i'm looking for.
 
My first bass was active/passive Marcus Miller jazz bass, i dug the passive sound more, but eventually traded it in for my second bass. My second bass is a stingray, which is all active, and is an awesome instrument. I recently however got a Rickenbacker 4001 with some flats on it, and i am addicted to its passive tone. Depends on what you're into i guess, but right now my Rick is the best sounding to me.
 
I love my active/passive JB. I mostly play it in active mode, the passive mode has its own sound and knowing that it's there for me when the battery runs out is great:) (I have yet to play at a gig - I'm already stressed and paranoid that everything will go wrong, at least I know I have the passive mode by my side :D )
 
My favorte bass is my Big Al. I love that it can go active or passive. There is something that's a bit more earthy to my ears in passive basses, but it's not enough to push me over to the full time passive side. I love the tweaking control I get wtih active basses, and I only feel completely safe when I have a midrange control on board. Stages, rooms, and bands can differ enormously, and I want to have total control over how my bass sits and cuts through the mix. That's sometimes not possible with a passive bass.
 
Active electronics have matured and improved so much since their inception (i.e. Gibson RD Artist; the exception being Alembic which started off first-rate), that for me it's hard to ever go back to purely passive instruments. High-quality (there's the key factor) active electronics offer so many attractive advantages - such as no loss of high frequencies with long cable runs, improved sensitivity to touch, more tone-shaping options with onboard EQ - and on and on and on...

Let's face it: Technological progress is a hallmark of modern times. You can either accept its gifts and leverage its advantages...or you can become a bitter Luddite, stubbornly staring into the rear-view mirror of life... :ninja:

MM
 
I've never been able to shake the sound of a passive bass, especially a J with good pick ups. I strongly prefer passive. If the bass is active I like a passive option on it.

A preamp is handy but my amp has always proved it's worth in that area. :)
 

Latest posts