• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Agathis or Alder. .. REAL difference?

I've never heard the DiMarzio P Pups, but if their other pickups are anything to go on you would not be sorry. DiMarzio just rules, hands down. And its not that I dislike Seymour Duncan, but I've been impressed time and time again with DiMarzio's. Guitar and Bass pickups alike.
 
I'm looking to buy a P-bass and im on a low budget...

It's between the Squier VM P-bass or a used MIM Fender P. I'm going to be replacing the pickups with S.D. Quarter Pounders and im wondering if the wood will make much of a difference in the sound (Squier is agathis, MIM would be alder).

Would the S.D p-up really pick up on the wood differences or would it not make much of a difference? I'm also playing this through a Traynor all-tube head, so please keep that in mind as well.

QUOTE]

I have an Agathis body Squier Precision Special 5 right now that I upgraded Villex pickups and a Badass bridge in addition to some other little tweaks such as relocating the string tree, shaving the nut down a bit, etc. It's been my primary bass for several years now, but I'm beginning to hit the wall with it; and I think the agathis body and cheap neck wood is the primary culprit. There's a reason you can buy these things for $250; cheap woods, cheap parts, cheap labor. When I first bought this bass and had the mods done, I thought I'd accomplished an end around the 'scam' of high end basses. Well, truth is you truly get what you pay for. My bass still sounds good, but it's unstable, needs more maintenance than it should, and doesn't really sit in a mix the way a Sadowsky or Lakeland does. I'm eyeing an Xotic right now to replace it, or even a really nice Warmoth. Probably always keep my 'frankenFender', but it just won't be my first choice after I 'graduate' to something a bit more pro.

Having said all that, if I was looking for a decent economical bass, I still think the Squire is a great deal - and I'd buy one again. Just don't expect miracles.
 
I've never heard the DiMarzio P Pups, but if their other pickups are anything to go on you would not be sorry. DiMarzio just rules, hands down. And its not that I dislike Seymour Duncan, but I've been impressed time and time again with DiMarzio's. Guitar and Bass pickups alike.

+1 - I too have not tried the DiMarzio P pickups, but use their Model J in my Squier VM fretless, and they are awesome. I found the description of their tone on DiMarzio's website to be pretty accurate. I've read many people posting about the quarter pounders who do not like them for being too bright, whereas I understand the Model P is more full range, with an articulate bottom end.
 
I have an agathis bodied Ibanez RD300. Sounds fantastic.
Don't buy a bass with agathis if you want sustain though.

My LTD has crazy good sustain. As with any wood, it depends more on the chunk(s) they used to make your bass.

On my LTD, even after pulling the frets and lowering the action for max mwah, notes just sing. Sustain was even longer when it had the frets and normal action.

oyo
 
I have an agathis bodied ESP/LTD B-155. Great unplugged tone, nice and resonant, good sustain.

I got it to pull the frets out of it, but almost didn't due to the great stock tone.

The only thing that let's it down a little are the stock LTD electronics. They are good, but not great.

The agathis body is much better than I had hoped it would be. I'd say go for the VM, and don't sweat over the agathis!

BTw, do a google picture search for agathis. What a beautiful tree. I have one as a desktop background.

oyo
Hey, the b155 stock electronics arent great, but if you want to make a great upgrade cheap. Add the G & B 3 band electronics ESP puts in their 3band models. I like it a lot. Then add a better set of pickups. They are only $49 here!!
Invalid Link Removed
 
As long as we are talking about all this... I had two near exact basses, same electronics, very similar necks (one was Warmoth with the steel inserts, one not.) Active jazz pickup configuration. Recorded on both of them. The 3 piece Alder bodied one was more thick/muddy. The 1 piece Swamp Ash body was more defined/thin. I use a positive and a negative word to describe... because depending on what sound you are after it is a good thing or a bad thing.

Another test... two different 34" scale basses, same electronics. One sounds full, bassy, and the other sounds extremely articulate, thin. Did recordings... even people with no musical ability can tell the difference and have a preference. Wood matters.

Another... same semi-hollow body, same electronics. One made of Mahogany, the other maple. Plugged in, with flatwounds, sound very similar. Unplugged, the Mahogany body screams and sounds like it must be twice the size of the maple body. But who cares.. since I don't play it unplugged. ;)

People will try and tell you since we play electric instruments the wood is all hype but it isn't - unless you are processing your sound into oblivion maybe... it really matters. The hype comes into play when people talk about how Alder is "the best" or "Mahogany cannot be beat for sustain." Or "Asian wood sucks". Only YOUR ears can tell YOU what sounds good to you.

I've been surprised by Asian guitars just as many times as disappointed by American or European ones. The wood doesn't know or care where it grew up or who cut it... it just does what it does.
 
I once had played two basses (Fender J) that usually sounded very much the same. But that time one had fresh strings the other had totally dead strings (no, not D-E-A-D tuning, they were just dead). The one with the dead strings sounded totally ******. I think this is something every bass player should experience so they get a feel for when strings are so dead that they give a totally different tone to the instrument. Especially newbies would never think about it and may miss out an otherwise good instrument.
 
As long as we are talking about all this... I had two near exact basses, same electronics, very similar necks (one was Warmoth with the steel inserts, one not.) Active jazz pickup configuration. Recorded on both of them. The 3 piece Alder bodied one was more thick/muddy. The 1 piece Swamp Ash body was more defined/thin. I use a positive and a negative word to describe... because depending on what sound you are after it is a good thing or a bad thing.

Another test... two different 34" scale basses, same electronics. One sounds full, bassy, and the other sounds extremely articulate, thin. Did recordings... even people with no musical ability can tell the difference and have a preference. Wood matters.

Another... same semi-hollow body, same electronics. One made of Mahogany, the other maple. Plugged in, with flatwounds, sound very similar. Unplugged, the Mahogany body screams and sounds like it must be twice the size of the maple body. But who cares.. since I don't play it unplugged. ;)

People will try and tell you since we play electric instruments the wood is all hype but it isn't - unless you are processing your sound into oblivion maybe... it really matters. The hype comes into play when people talk about how Alder is "the best" or "Mahogany cannot be beat for sustain." Or "Asian wood sucks". Only YOUR ears can tell YOU what sounds good to you.

I've been surprised by Asian guitars just as many times as disappointed by American or European ones. The wood doesn't know or care where it grew up or who cut it... it just does what it does.

i won't argue that your two identical (other than wood) basses sounded different, but there's more than just electronics and the body. the pickup heights could be different, hell the hardware could have an effect as well as different strings, or even the string life. but really as others have said, i believe it's the piece of wood that you have way more so than the species of wood
 
i won't argue that your two identical (other than wood) basses sounded different, but there's more than just electronics and the body. the pickup heights could be different, hell the hardware could have an effect as well as different strings, or even the string life. but really as others have said, i believe it's the piece of wood that you have way more so than the species of wood

Shape is important too. Check this out:

 
I'm looking to buy a P-bass and im on a low budget...

It's between the Squier VM P-bass or a used MIM Fender P. I'm going to be replacing the pickups with S.D. Quarter Pounders and im wondering if the wood will make much of a difference in the sound (Squier is agathis, MIM would be alder).

Would the S.D p-up really pick up on the wood differences or would it not make much of a difference? I'm also playing this through a Traynor all-tube head, so please keep that in mind as well.

QUOTE]

I have an Agathis body Squier Precision Special 5 right now that I upgraded Villex pickups and a Badass bridge in addition to some other little tweaks such as relocating the string tree, shaving the nut down a bit, etc. It's been my primary bass for several years now, but I'm beginning to hit the wall with it; and I think the agathis body and cheap neck wood is the primary culprit. There's a reason you can buy these things for $250; cheap woods, cheap parts, cheap labor. When I first bought this bass and had the mods done, I thought I'd accomplished an end around the 'scam' of high end basses. Well, truth is you truly get what you pay for. My bass still sounds good, but it's unstable, needs more maintenance than it should, and doesn't really sit in a mix the way a Sadowsky or Lakeland does. I'm eyeing an Xotic right now to replace it, or even a really nice Warmoth. Probably always keep my 'frankenFender', but it just won't be my first choice after I 'graduate' to something a bit more pro.

Having said all that, if I was looking for a decent economical bass, I still think the Squire is a great deal - and I'd buy one again. Just don't expect miracles.

Yeah, in terms of durability, my only complaint about my Squier VM J-bass is that the neck isn't very sturdy. It was once sitting kinda wierd in my hardshell case and the neck got so screwed up I had to go get it readjusted (this was also due to a string change, it wasn't THAT drastic though). Other than that its great, never goes outta tune and sounds awesome.

I have played the Squier VM P-bass on many occasions and liked the sound of it a great deal...the feel was nice too.


BUT....

Any suggestions on that white colored body? Sorry, but I'm not a fan of olympic white. First bass was, and it was less than sentimental...lol. So any quick fix suggestions that aren't gonna break the bank? (please no sharpie ones lol)
 
Reserve judgment on the white body until you see it under stage lighting. A friend of mine has a white SX Jazz, (nice axe for 89 bucks), and my first reaction to the color was "So what?" .

The first time I saw it changing color under the lights, I thought "Cool!".

Just a thought.

oyo
 
I'm looking to buy a P-bass and im on a low budget...

It's between the Squier VM P-bass or a used MIM Fender P. I'm going to be replacing the pickups with S.D. Quarter Pounders and im wondering if the wood will make much of a difference in the sound (Squier is agathis, MIM would be alder).

Would the S.D p-up really pick up on the wood differences or would it not make much of a difference? I'm also playing this through a Traynor all-tube head, so please keep that in mind as well.



If anyone wants to sell off a Squier VM P-bass or a MIM Fender after reading this, send me a link or PM if you want =)

IME, pickups & FRETBOARD material make a much bigger difference in tone than body material. I think I read on this board somewhere that Roger Sadowsky agrees re: fretboard wood having a bigger influence on tone than body wood.
 
I know that different woods have different tones, but a lot of that stuff gets lost in the mix. I'm sure if you made a recording with an alder bodied jazz bass, then swapped out that body for an ash body and recorded an identical piece you might notice a tonal difference. The trick would be that, other than the body, everything else would have to be identical. Pickups, strings, even the particular piece of maple that the neck is made of can affect tone. Most of those differences get lost in the mix.

Justin Chancellor of Tool liked the Wal he had so much he had them make him an identical one. When it arrived it sounded quite different from the other one, although it was made of the same woods, had the same pickups and strings, etc.
I'm looking to buy a P-bass and im on a low budget...

It's between the Squier VM P-bass or a used MIM Fender P. I'm going to be replacing the pickups with S.D. Quarter Pounders and im wondering if the wood will make much of a difference in the sound (Squier is agathis, MIM would be alder).

Would the S.D p-up really pick up on the wood differences or would it not make much of a difference? I'm also playing this through a Traynor all-tube head, so please keep that in mind as well.



If anyone wants to sell off a Squier VM P-bass or a MIM Fender after reading this, send me a link or PM if you want =)
 
About the p bass. I own the squire vm p bass and love it. Before I bought it I was trying out other p basses at guitar center. And the mim p bass didnt sound as good as the squire vm p bass. And I replaced the pickups with duncan spb3s since the stock pickup was missing that punch the p bass is known for. With duncan spb3s and a badass2 bridge this p bass growls. I dont really think the wood matters that much in the tone. For me the color was another thing I liked about it. Ever since I bought my jazz I have wanted a white bass im not really sure why. I cant belive that the squire vm p bass pretty much replaced my mim fender jazz bass. The buzzing of the single coils made me hate that bass.
 
If you can test both, I suggest you try the heavier one between the two... I have no experience with Agathis, I only tried a few Squier Deluxe Active Jazz V's unplugged, and the sound and weight were somewhat similar to my old Rockbass Streamer LX 5 (light, small Carolena body, softy type). On the other hand, I saw both light and very heavy alder bodies, and I have to say I liked the sound of the heavier one better. I also think that lighter basses feel cheap and toyish, but that's just me (and the other big guys on the forum here;)).

Apart from the sound, if you're gonna mod it it's better to have a solid frame, so that's another reason why I'd recommend the heavier one (it's probably harder too). Sure, there are people on this forum that say they have no reliability issues with agathis or basswood bodied basses, but the fact is that they are softer woods. There's a reason why we build houses using oak, fir or cedar and not basswood. (actually, if you don't like to work your ass off, you may be better off choosing the lighter one. Nothing beats the feeling you'll have when driving screws thru the body with your bare hands or a flimsy screwdriver:D)
 

Latest posts