As long as we are talking about all this... I had two near exact basses, same electronics, very similar necks (one was Warmoth with the steel inserts, one not.) Active jazz pickup configuration. Recorded on both of them. The 3 piece Alder bodied one was more thick/muddy. The 1 piece Swamp Ash body was more defined/thin. I use a positive and a negative word to describe... because depending on what sound you are after it is a good thing or a bad thing.
Another test... two different 34" scale basses, same electronics. One sounds full, bassy, and the other sounds extremely articulate, thin. Did recordings... even people with no musical ability can tell the difference and have a preference. Wood matters.
Another... same semi-hollow body, same electronics. One made of Mahogany, the other maple. Plugged in, with flatwounds, sound very similar. Unplugged, the Mahogany body screams and sounds like it must be twice the size of the maple body. But who cares.. since I don't play it unplugged.
People will try and tell you since we play electric instruments the wood is all hype but it isn't - unless you are processing your sound into oblivion maybe... it really matters. The hype comes into play when people talk about how Alder is "the best" or "Mahogany cannot be beat for sustain." Or "Asian wood sucks". Only YOUR ears can tell YOU what sounds good to you.
I've been surprised by Asian guitars just as many times as disappointed by American or European ones. The wood doesn't know or care where it grew up or who cut it... it just does what it does.