TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Wow, didn't notice that before. In both the back of neck shot of the fretted, and the looking down at the bass horn shot, you can see that the edge has been left pretty square, with most of the material intact, as if it were going to connect to a SC non-horn. I've thought of doing that before, I guess I won't be the first now.j-raj said:sweet basses jorg!
were my eyes messing with me or did the back of the neck have a rather unusual taper as the positioning got higher than the 12th fret?
Lo end PUNCH said:Very cool bridge design on that fretless one.
I don't know why Iturra did it, but I might do it because: that far up on the neck, the neck is too wide for you to ever possibly want to wrap your thumb around the bass side (even if you are a thumb-wrapper). So, why should we round over the bass side of the back of the neck and remove that wood? Leave it there, to increase the stiffness of the neck! It pretty much looks the same as a neck for a singlecut, before the bass body wing is attached.j-raj said:I know it's amazing, well done.
As for the heel on that 6'er.... wonder if that was Jorg's request, if so, why?