Hate to break it to you.. but the 50s Classic line (one of which I own) and likewise the Vintera line, they may be less expensive, but they're not cheaper. heh...I know I'm not making the decision any easier.
The American Professional line are really nice basses. The Vintera line are really nice basses. I went for the 50s Classic for exactly the same reasons as you're looking at a Vintera, and the only disappointment I have is the honey blonde finish is SO durable that it'll look pristine no matter how many hours I put on it. It absolutely bleeds class and I want to wear a suit whenever I pick it up to play. Also it's got a huge and woody tone and loves flats and rounds and likely everything in between.
Admittedly, I've got a total of maybe one hour play time on any MIA P basses, and hundreds of hours on the 50s, so my point of comparison's a bit skewed. But I don't look at any other contemporary* P and lust after it for its build or sound.
(*contemporary vs the 1960 pre-CBS Precision I somehow scored by a miracle a couple years ago. That doesn't count even though it does slay haha. That said, the 50s sits on my shoulder longer w/o discomfort than the 1960 and that is important)
Thanks for the comment!
Yeah, you've definitely made my decision a little harder haha. Was leaning towards the Pro, but now you've got me wondering if it's worth it again. I reckon it probably isn't, in the sense that either bass is enough P to last a lifetime, but I reckon I'm more likely to wish I had an Am Pro down the line than the other way around. It's a toughie though. That blonde Vintera is a classy piece of kit indeed. Can imagine (about the finish). Would love if it had a nitro finish.
How are the necks on these Classic 50s/Vintera 50s basses? Is it true that they rarely (if ever) move because of how chunky they are?
Last edited: