• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ampeg PF350/500 Part V

Status
Not open for further replies.
Plugged my new(ish) PF500 into my 1994 Eden D410T again. Still tweaking the EQ, but the overall sound is, frankly, somewhat bullying (which is fine, since at least one of the guitarists NEEDS that, I assure you.) No cutting out, a little gravel on the tone from residential power issues (bringing the gain down helped, but the 60-cycle isn't going all the way away. This only happens at the rehearsal basement, so I shrug and move on.)

What 2x10 or other light (2x12 neo, unusual config, 1x15 neo) cab will let me move air while being able to tote it down a tight stairwell (or pack it into my roomie's Smart Car, which is a consideration?)
 
So I did a little testing....


gain at 12, master at 2, bass 1, Treble 12 mid frequency set to any of the 5 setting and the mid range at 11>>>>

light touch playing the amp's limit light flashes and sometimes a farty sound from the speaker.

The Ampeg tone is there and its a shame that these other quirks are present because I really want this Amp but the quirks and the fact that the same wattage Mark Bass amp set at all eq at 12, gain at just about 3 and the volume at 4 is so much louder than with the Ampegs set as I stated above. its so loud it scary and I feel that I will never have to push the MB hard.....only thing is I'll probabbly have to pull the name plate off the Metal grill and spray paint the speaker...lol


I dialed in the same settings as stated above with the ultra low on, ultra high off, mid range control at #2 and no compression. I am using a passive Am Standard Jazz with stock Pups. Ive got a PF210 and a PF115 horns off.


I started with just the 210. Using my fingers, I was unable to get the peak light to come on even when digging in pretty good. I was reluctant to really slap the strings hard, but with a moderate slap... still no peak light. My only complaint was some vibration/rattling of the head.

Switching to the 115 was basically the same as the 210 except it seemed to take the lows a bit better. Still no peak.

With both cabs daisy chained together everything cleaned up a bit. Still no peak. I was more interested to see if was going to cut out. No problems.

I have not had this rig in a gig situation only playing in the basement and jamming with friends. This is why I bought it and I think it works great for what I need it for.

I did have one problem several months ago with the fault light coming on and the unit shutting down. After several attempts of turning it off and on I was still getting nothing except some clicking noises. I thought it was fried. After checking my connections I noticed one of my speaker cables was loose. I let it cool down for a good hour before trying it again and it fired up without a problem. It's been flawless since (knock on wood).



Also...

I downloaded a decibel meter app on my android as well to test the fan noise. With the head off, the room noise was around 37. The click of me turning the head on jumped the meter to 66. The fan turned on after a few seconds and the meter settled down to about 40 DB. I had my phone about about 1-2 feet in front of the head.
 
In an earlier thread there was a discussion about the fault light turning on for a few seconds while the PF500 was powering up and shutting down. Everyone's was not doing this. Mine does this and I have not had any cut out issues. I wonder if the heads that don't have the fault light coming on are also the ones prone to the cutting out issues.
 
SkiFor3 said:
In an earlier thread there was a discussion about the fault light turning on for a few seconds while the PF500 was powering up and shutting down. Everyone's was not doing this. Mine does this and I have not had any cut out issues. I wonder if the heads that don't have the fault light coming on are also the ones prone to the cutting out issues.

My fault light does the same thing as yours and so far no cutting out issues on my head . I can't believe that would make a difference but stranger things have happened .
 
So I did a little testing....





I dialed in the same settings as stated above with the ultra low on, ultra high off, mid range control at #2 and no compression. I am using a passive Am Standard Jazz with stock Pups. Ive got a PF210 and a PF115 horns off.


I started with just the 210. Using my fingers, I was unable to get the peak light to come on even when digging in pretty good. I was reluctant to really slap the strings hard, but with a moderate slap... still no peak light. My only complaint was some vibration/rattling of the head.

Switching to the 115 was basically the same as the 210 except it seemed to take the lows a bit better. Still no peak.

With both cabs daisy chained together everything cleaned up a bit. Still no peak. I was more interested to see if was going to cut out. No problems.

I have not had this rig in a gig situation only playing in the basement and jamming with friends. This is why I bought it and I think it works great for what I need it for.

I did have one problem several months ago with the fault light coming on and the unit shutting down. After several attempts of turning it off and on I was still getting nothing except some clicking noises. I thought it was fried. After checking my connections I noticed one of my speaker cables was loose. I let it cool down for a good hour before trying it again and it fired up without a problem. It's been flawless since (knock on wood).



Also...

I downloaded a decibel meter app on my android as well to test the fan noise. With the head off, the room noise was around 37. The click of me turning the head on jumped the meter to 66. The fan turned on after a few seconds and the meter settled down to about 40 DB. I had my phone about about 1-2 feet in front of the head.

Interesting, too many little things with the amp, maybe I got a bad one.

just for the hell of it I ran the MB head from my Jeff Berlin model ( which I think is the LMII) into the ampeg speaker. sounded better but a lot of vibrations from the cab with the gain at 3, master at 5 and the eq flat with no filters.

whatever, it was worth a try.
 
Hey Guys

I was thinking of gettng either the PF-350 or the PF-500 but saw this thread and read only part V (this one). Regarding the cutting out, does that only happen when running at 4 ohms out? If I get the PF-115HE or PF-210HE could I still get the cut out issue?
Also from what I gather these cabs are 8 ohms so does that mean I will not get the full 350 watts (pf-350) or 500 watts (pf-500)? would I need 4 ohm cabs to get the full wattage... not sure how that works as I am a noob to non combo amps.
I can't decide if I want the PF-350 or PF-500 with PF-115HE or PF-210HE
 
Hey Guys

I was thinking of gettng either the PF-350 or the PF-500 but saw this thread and read only part V (this one). Regarding the cutting out, does that only happen when running at 4 ohms out? If I get the PF-115HE or PF-210HE could I still get the cut out issue?
Also from what I gather these cabs are 8 ohms so does that mean I will not get the full 350 watts (pf-350) or 500 watts (pf-500)? would I need 4 ohm cabs to get the full wattage... not sure how that works as I am a noob to non combo amps.
I can't decide if I want the PF-350 or PF-500 with PF-115HE or PF-210HE

You can download the manuals. It will give you some of the information you are asking about. It is a good place to start.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
 
Trying to throttle a small 4 ohm cab with a butt-ton of wattage is pointless. The cab isn't going to take it, and you're going to blow it in short order when you keep turning up and up and wondering why you're not getting more volume. If you want to be that loud, you need a bigger cab rig than a 210 or 115.
 
PF, that may be my Ampeg bias creeping in. I have played Mesa tube amps and like them very well, but I judge all amps by the SVT/V4/B-15, and upon reading what you said, I think that when I say an amp sounds "tubey," I think what I really mean is "sounds like Ampeg tube amps." So take that into consideration.

I'd also add that while I think the PF500 is overall a great amp (problems some folks have been having notwithstanding), I think the SVT 7 Pro would be more pleasing to a fan of Ampeg tube amps.

The 7Pro is a killer sounding amp. I would still own one if mine didn't blow up(it was a first generation when they had the problems with the chip). If I was in the market a new 7Pro would be at or near the top of my list. I wasn't super impressed by the PF500, although it wasn't bad at all. Its probably not a fair comparison, but I do like the Pro series more. At the price point, the PF series are certainly worth checking out!
 
And mine has never cut out powering 2 410 cabs @ 4ohms.

People seldom report lack of problems, because that is the expectation. The problems are readily discussed to the point where the overwhelming majority of posts discussing these heads are about failures of one sort or another.


I'm not saying these failures didn't happen or were a result of operator error, just giving a context for what you will find if you look for feedback on these heads.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.