• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ampeg vs.

#2
An SVT is an SVT is an SVT as far as I'm concerned. I've played them all but the Heritage SVT-CL and they're all great amps as long as they're in working order. The SVT-CL is a bit different in that it has separate gain and master and only one channel, but if you turn the master up to about 3:00 and use the gain to control volume, it sounds a lot more like the vintage SVT's, plus you can get preamp distortion out of it by cranking gain if that's your thang.

For cool points, obviously the Magnavox wins, but MTI SVT's are just as good if you ask me. They get a bad rap because they were made in Japan and the owner was a great salesman who had no idea about engineering and they brought out a lot of crappy new products, but one thing they could always do was build a nice SVT.
 
#3
Loving the SVT-VR myself.
I guy I know, in the know, told me the SVT-AV is his favorite.
I agree with Jimmy, there is no bad SVT as long as we are talking about the "real" ones. (although the hybrids are good amps too, I'm not including them)
 
#4
prd004 said:
Loving the SVT-VR myself.
I guy I know, in the know, told me the SVT-AV is his favorite.
I agree with Jimmy, there is no bad SVT as long as we are talking about the "real" ones. (although the hybrids are good amps too, I'm not including them)
Click to expand...

Not too into the hybrids myself. I'm young and in my prime, I don't care about lugging around 100lb amps as long as I get that wonderful grind and tone
 
#5
Pills Are Yummy said:
Ampeg SVT CL VS. Ampeg 80's MIT SVT VS. 73-75 magnavox SVT
Click to expand...

Can't go wrong with any of those, really. The modern CL/AV amps are single channel with a master volume, while the vintage/MTI/VR are two channel. With a newer amp, you are farther away from necessary maintenance. If you buy anything 20+ years old you should also consider it may need a cap job (about $250 repair), but any amp that's been used/abused for an extended period of time may need some work.
 
#7
Brand new should be reliable, no question. But even vintage models are built like a tank and once serviced, should give you years of trouble free performance. Often times, people on here go on about the service required for tube amps, I currently own three vintage Ampegs and have had each of them for 25 + years and rarely do I take a trip to the tech. YMMV.
 
#8
dmac1961 said:
Brand new should be reliable, no question. But even vintage models are built like a tank and once serviced, should give you years of trouble free performance. Often times, people on here go on about the service required for tube amps, I currently own three vintage Ampegs and have had each of them for 25 + years and rarely do I take a trip to the tech. YMMV.
Click to expand...
Word, although I must admit that my 69 is back in the shop ;) But it was rode hard and put away wet for decades before I got it restored, so hey...
 
#11
johnpbass said:
Yours is the Doug Ingle signature model, right JimmyM?;)
Click to expand...
Indeed. Except after Doug sold it (he got new ones all the time back then), whoever else owned it beat the crap out of it. So I forgive its occasional flare-ups. Most of them have been tube related, though. This problem is the first real problem I've had since I got it restored in 2009.
 
#16
I have an early 80s SVT that I bought new. It's got a lot of miles on it. I've had it retubed once, and it's now semi retired. It's a PITA to move around, but it's the best sounding bass amp I've ever used.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back