Thanks to all for the great feedback on the D-350 and PJB cabs. You all cemented for me that it's the head I want. Also leaning toward a C-2 or 4.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
No, not addressing low volume home practice. The D-350 is a gig-worthy amp for moderate volume applications. Provided it’s enough rig for the gig, there’s no difference in low end between the D-350 and D-800 (without the deep switch engaged).The context of the question AH was addressing was a low-volume home practice situation.![]()
Thanks to all for the great feedback on the D-350 and PJB cabs. You all cemented for me that it's the head I want. Also leaning toward a C-2 or 4.
The D-350 combined with the Subway 112 was our benchmark test rig and it went out on gigs around the SF bay area (both as a 112 and 212 configuration).Paired a D800 with two C2s and did not care for the tone. PJB is some spiffy looking gear, and I was intrigued enough with the idea of a micro stack to give them a try. A PJB head into those C2s sounded a lot better, but still didnt quite do it for me. I would up going with a SW112 for my "micro" rig.
YMMV, just sharing my ownimpression of a Mesa head + PJB cab paring.
Great feedback on the PJB cabs from both of you, greatly appreciated! I am thinking of going with C-4 for more bottom end and power handling. Assume the difference with the C-2 on the bottom end at very low volume wouldn't be very noticeable, but would at moderate volume? Also, liking the red for something different. Any opinions on that vs the black?
Paired a D800 with two C2s and did not care for the tone. PJB is some spiffy looking gear, and I was intrigued enough with the idea of a micro stack to give them a try. A PJB head into those C2s sounded a lot better, but still didnt quite do it for me. I would up going with a SW112 for my "micro" rig.
YMMV, just sharing my ownimpression of a Mesa head + PJB cab paring.
The D-350 combined with the Subway 112 was our benchmark test rig and it went out on gigs around the SF bay area (both as a 112 and 212 configuration).
The small PJB cabinets just don’t have the combination of sensitivity and LF extension that the Subway 112’s have.
Would love to know how the GKs compare to the Mesa cabs, if anyone has that experience.
Ran GK 212 neos for quite a while. Silver face line before the black face one you linked. Rock solid cabs I had zero complaint with. Sometimes you get what you pay for, and in this case the Mesa cabs ARE that much better, yes.
Edit: If you are patient and cruse Craigslist and the like, you can sneak in used SW cabs for the new GK cab price. 2 of my SW cabs were used "WOAH! I'm not letting that pass!" listings I stumbled upon.
I have that exact bass. It's a good 'un.Also bought brand new cobra blue Ultra Jazz for $1,500.
I have that exact bass. It's a good 'un.
Curious why Mesa chose to pair the Subway 112, not the 115 as a benchmark.The D-350 combined with the Subway 112 was our benchmark test rig and it went out on gigs around the SF bay area (both as a 112 and 212 configuration).
The small PJB cabinets just don’t have the combination of sensitivity and LF extension that the Subway 112’s have.
Initially for size, but we also tested with the other models and the 115 went out on gigs plenty too.Curious why Mesa chose to pair the Subway 112, not the 115 as a benchmark.
Recently I'm gaining an appreciation for the depth of tonal quality of the D-350. A friendly pre-amp mated to a surprisingly muscular power amplifier. Completely outclasses 200W micros.
I run mine most often through one or two Genzler BA12-3 SLT and imagine the Subway 112 in comparison would warm up the lows.
For Europe too?We are building and shipping D-350’s and D-800’s as we speak.
Good to hear!We are building and shipping D-350’s and D-800’s as we speak.