• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Any experience with the AT2035 and/or MXL 2003A?

Feb 10, 2010
2,084
110
From what I've read, they each punch above their price tag - does that ring true? I'm looking for a mic for acoustic guitar and violin.

Happy Thanksgiving, American forum members. Remember, the right leg is bigger but the left is more tender. Invalid Link Removed
 
I have the 2003A. It's a great mic if you want things to have a lot of top end detail. I call it the anti-ribbon mic. It's basically the opposite profile of all my ribbon mics. A little thin on the bottom end, fairly flat through the midrange. Slight dip in the upper mids. Big bump up in the treble frequencies.

It's a mic that I like for things where I don't want a ton of bottom end, but do want some sparkle up top (pop vocals, acoustic guitar, tambourine, shaker, triangle, wood block, male vocals that sound dull on their own, female vocals that you want to sit above everything else, etc.).

It's a mic I dislike for all the opposite things. It's too bright for electric guitar. It's too bright for high pitched vocalists. It's too thin for vocalists with a deep voice that needs to be captured as such. It's too thin for bass, unless coupled with a DI in which case it's still a little bright.

This is a minor complaint, but the included shockmount is absolute garbage. The bands continually eject themselves and you have to reassemble it. A threaded mount would have been much preferred. MXL offers this kind of mount on other mics of theirs, so the omission has always seemed strange to me.
 
Interesting. What about transient response? From the sound samples I've heard, both mics have the harsher response characteristic of that price range; does the 2003 respond well, to processing? (In a perfect world, I'd be using a U67...)
 
One can dream indeed.

To put it in perspective: I have a matched pair of U87 clones (I've compared them to an actual U87, and they're VERY close to identical), but I still find myself using the 2003A for certain sources. It's a cheap mic, but it really works well for certain things. Not a mic for everything, but has some specific magic.
 

Latest posts