Mark Wilson
Supporting Member
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
My only experience with Rogue is their VB100 viola bass which I found to be a very pleasant surprise--same bass as the Epiphone viola but $100 cheaper and with the more Hofner accurate headstock shape and control plate. It's been a solid player for me now for several years.
I think Rogue is a great bass unless you are looking for playability, tone, craftsmanship, comfort, not being laughed off stage, resale value, a sense of pride, or respect for yourself as a bass player.
chubfarm2001 said:I think Rogue is a great bass unless you are looking for playability, tone, craftsmanship, comfort, not being laughed off stage, resale value, a sense of pride, or respect for yourself as a bass player.
I've always wondered how many posts like this were made by people who actually have hands-on experience with whatever gear they're flaming..
Attitude fail. You see, I don't judge myself by what the headstock of my bass says. If it sounds, plays, feels good enough then I'll rock it! I've never been laughed off stage, only asked to join other bands![]()
I got one of the Rogue Beatles basses years ago, probably not long after they came out. Horrible tone. There are way better cheap basses out there, IMO.
Funny because I upgraded just about everything on mine (lighter, smaller, sealed pro tuners & keys/new wiring harness/ new pots, caps & switches/new shielding plate/new jack & plate/ gold, pearl topped control knobs/Hofner tailpiece) along with a fret level & dressing. The only thing I didn't change was the pickups. I liked the tone to begin with and with the new pots & wiring, they sound better than ever.
I dunno, for a hollow-body, this thing's a pretty damned "solid" little bass.