TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Nope. I’ve played for decades and never had that problem. Had other issues with sound techs occasionally but never that.
That hasn't been my experience either. There are guys in my area that I have to ask to shelf the highs, depending on my backline. Often I'll have to leave HF intact in my signal so I can get the definition I want for myself, but it's not my intention to send that out front. The guys I work with frequently don't do a whole lot to my signal - I'm sending a fairly well processed sound. I find a humble, open conversation works well in the venues I'm grateful to play regularly these days. Multi-band shows? I don't even worry about it. Line check, bash it out for 45, move on. We don't do a lot of them any more.Must be nice.......unless I'm running the sound (smaller clubs) it seems to be the rule for me anymore. Were you handing pre or post signal off to the techs?
Edit: As I think about this, expectations also play a large part. A sound engineer will let highs pass through for certain styles (slap, etc). But for those of us playing in a rock environment there's an expectation that the bass will have little to no high end (as it should if the engineer is slotting frequencies) to fit properly into the mix. Every house engineer in this geographical area follows a similar formula. If you are a rock bassist you have to accept the fact that you will be mixed a certain way.
My first set of rounds was a set of Roto-Sound Swing bass in 1973 and there was no looking back at flats. I bought a JB last summer that came with a set of flats. Four recording sessions one gig and numerous hours of practice, the Fender Jazz now has a fresh set of DR Lo Riders and all is well in the world again.Has anybody else gone back to rounds after using flats exclusively or predominantly for a long period of time?
I’d been using flats almost exclusively on my Fenders for 4 or 5 years when I sold them last year and bought a short scale 6-string bass that could only be strung with rounds.
I hated the rounds at first — rough and overly bright — and when I bought another 4-string Fender last month I thought for sure I was going to string it with flats, but… rounds are kinda cooler.
Sure, they’re a bit rougher, but it’s really not as bad as some flats player want you to believe. The noise you get with the fretting hand isn’t as bad either.
They’re bright, but at least I have the ability to turn the brightness down with muting or foam or the tone and treble knobs.
And they’re so much more flexible! (Yes, I know TIs are flexible, but it’s nice that most rounds are flexible).
I don’t know. I guess I got on the TB flats train because I feared I was missing out, and stayed on the train, believing that all rounds were rough, overly bright and that the noise was unbearable.
But I guess I now see why people were excited about rounds when they first came out.
Anybody else? What’s your story?
Yes I had a revelation with TI flats, but then had even more of a revelation with TI jazz rounds. Rounds all around. Fretless fretted etc. they’re Dang spendy now though with all the new taxes on us consumers.
Always post, and often with a pedal board. However, after thinking about it, I have had subs cranked way too loud. That can kill your definition. But it happens a lot less than it used to when neo subs first appeared and everyone was so enamored with the extended lows that they forgot they were mixing bands.Must be nice.......unless I'm running the sound (smaller clubs) it seems to be the rule for me anymore. Were you handing pre or post signal off to the techs?
Edit: As I think about this, expectations also play a large part. A sound engineer will let highs pass through for certain styles (slap, etc). But for those of us playing in a rock environment there's an expectation that the bass will have little to no high end (as it should if the engineer is slotting frequencies) to fit properly into the mix. Every house engineer in this geographical area follows a similar formula. If you are a rock bassist you have to accept the fact that you will be mixed a certain way.
Has anybody else gone back to rounds after using flats exclusively or predominantly for a long period of time?
I’d been using flats almost exclusively on my Fenders for 4 or 5 years when I sold them last year and bought a short scale 6-string bass that could only be strung with rounds.
I hated the rounds at first — rough and overly bright — and when I bought another 4-string Fender last month I thought for sure I was going to string it with flats, but… rounds are kinda cooler.
Sure, they’re a bit rougher, but it’s really not as bad as some flats player want you to believe. The noise you get with the fretting hand isn’t as bad either.
They’re bright, but at least I have the ability to turn the brightness down with muting or foam or the tone and treble knobs.
And they’re so much more flexible! (Yes, I know TIs are flexible, but it’s nice that most rounds are flexible).
I don’t know. I guess I got on the TB flats train because I feared I was missing out, and stayed on the train, believing that all rounds were rough, overly bright and that the noise was unbearable.
But I guess I now see why people were excited about rounds when they first came out.
Anybody else? What’s your story?