• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Anybody else went back to rounds?

At one point, I was up to 9 basses with flats and only 1 with rounds. Currently at 7 with flats and 4 with rounds. So less skewed towards flats, but I don’t see myself moving any other basses to rounds anytime soon. I prefer playing flats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrapeBass
Nope. I’ve played for decades and never had that problem. Had other issues with sound techs occasionally but never that.

Must be nice.......unless I'm running the sound (smaller clubs) it seems to be the rule for me anymore. Were you handing pre or post signal off to the techs?

Edit: As I think about this, expectations also play a large part. A sound engineer will let highs pass through for certain styles (slap, etc). But for those of us playing in a rock environment there's an expectation that the bass will have little to no high end (as it should if the engineer is slotting frequencies) to fit properly into the mix. Every house engineer in this geographical area follows a similar formula. If you are a rock bassist you have to accept the fact that you will be mixed a certain way.
 
Last edited:
I haven’t “switched back” but I’ve definitely become more open to using them. I keep every bass except for one strung with flats, just a personal preference thing. I find for most bands I’m in (3 piece with me singing with a guitarist and a percussionist) flats are what I want. Lots of low end, very easy to dial in a good bass tone. However, the Labella Ian Marin Allison strings are really cool. I keep them on my squier PJ with EMG GZR’s whenever I need something different. Different tools for different sounds. Always great to have options.
 
I have not used flats in a while - in my musical context I have generally found that rounds blend better with the other instruments and have a bit better sustain. I don’t hate them or anything but rounds just tend to fit me better for what I do. This is after years and lots of dollars spent experimenting. YMMV
 
Must be nice.......unless I'm running the sound (smaller clubs) it seems to be the rule for me anymore. Were you handing pre or post signal off to the techs?

Edit: As I think about this, expectations also play a large part. A sound engineer will let highs pass through for certain styles (slap, etc). But for those of us playing in a rock environment there's an expectation that the bass will have little to no high end (as it should if the engineer is slotting frequencies) to fit properly into the mix. Every house engineer in this geographical area follows a similar formula. If you are a rock bassist you have to accept the fact that you will be mixed a certain way.
That hasn't been my experience either. There are guys in my area that I have to ask to shelf the highs, depending on my backline. Often I'll have to leave HF intact in my signal so I can get the definition I want for myself, but it's not my intention to send that out front. The guys I work with frequently don't do a whole lot to my signal - I'm sending a fairly well processed sound. I find a humble, open conversation works well in the venues I'm grateful to play regularly these days. Multi-band shows? I don't even worry about it. Line check, bash it out for 45, move on. We don't do a lot of them any more.

I can totally see this happening, though. Sounds like a pain to deal with.
 
Has anybody else gone back to rounds after using flats exclusively or predominantly for a long period of time?

I’d been using flats almost exclusively on my Fenders for 4 or 5 years when I sold them last year and bought a short scale 6-string bass that could only be strung with rounds.

I hated the rounds at first — rough and overly bright — and when I bought another 4-string Fender last month I thought for sure I was going to string it with flats, but… rounds are kinda cooler.

Sure, they’re a bit rougher, but it’s really not as bad as some flats player want you to believe. The noise you get with the fretting hand isn’t as bad either.

They’re bright, but at least I have the ability to turn the brightness down with muting or foam or the tone and treble knobs.

And they’re so much more flexible! (Yes, I know TIs are flexible, but it’s nice that most rounds are flexible).

I don’t know. I guess I got on the TB flats train because I feared I was missing out, and stayed on the train, believing that all rounds were rough, overly bright and that the noise was unbearable.

But I guess I now see why people were excited about rounds when they first came out.

Anybody else? What’s your story?
My first set of rounds was a set of Roto-Sound Swing bass in 1973 and there was no looking back at flats. I bought a JB last summer that came with a set of flats. Four recording sessions one gig and numerous hours of practice, the Fender Jazz now has a fresh set of DR Lo Riders and all is well in the world again.

I will say this. After 50 years of mostly playing Motown and R&B using rounds, I’ve had zero complaints from any band mates, soundmen, sound engineers, or producers about my tone. I have had conversions with the same that have mention working with bassists and their well loved flats they wouldn’t part with for a million dollars but should…
 
About two years ago three of my basses had flats, including my main P-Bass. These days only the Hofner has flats and that gets used very seldom. The reason for the change is arthritis, after playing I had aches in the finger joints, so I switched to light gauge roundwounds.
 
For recording I choose rounds/flats based on what the song/genre calls for.

For live gigs I use rounds almost exclusively. I often feel like I get lost in the "mix" on stage when I use flats. 95% of the time I can get "close enough" for live gigs with rounds, a piece of foam and a passive tone control. But of course, sometimes "close enough" isn't really close enough...
 
Yes I had a revelation with TI flats, but then had even more of a revelation with TI jazz rounds. Rounds all around. Fretless fretted etc. they’re Dang spendy now though with all the new taxes on us consumers.

TI Jazz Rounds are EXCEPTIONAL strings. The tone is totally unique and has an organic, "woody" quality that no other roundwounds are even remotely close to. They're not comparable to ANY other roundwounds. They are pretty much in a category of their own. I love them.

I like them better on short scale basses though. On long scale basses they get a bit too floppy for my playing style. Unlike most other strings, the short scale set actually feels slightly tighter overall than the long scale set

With TI Jazz Flats it's the other way around. I love the long scale set, but find the short scale set almost unplayable. The A-D-G-strings are too floppy for me, and the E-string is far too stiff/inarticulate. The drop in tension from E to A with the short scale set is insane! The rather hard to find "Höfner" short scale set is much better balanced, but too light/floppy for my taste.

TI seems to have a rather strange approach to electric bass strings. Each type is only available in ONE gauge, and it sometimes feels like they've picked the gauges for their bass string sets blindly out of a hat.. Take it or leave it. Which means they can be extremely hit-or-miss, depending on personal preferences.
 
8sbf7y.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: HaphAsSard
That happened to me!
I’ve used flats (and the occasional nylon tapes) for almost a decade on all my basses. For a few years, my dream bass tone was rooted in the 60s-70s so I used La Bellas, Pyramids and GHS and was fine with those. Then I got a bit bored with the tone and tried experimenting with brighter flats, I had good luck with both Chromes and TIs. But as my former band’s music was changing and as we started touring more and more, I always had to or was asked to boost the highs. Which led me to being curious about rounds again, I put a set on a bass, then another, then another. Now all my instruments but one wear rounds. I just like the flexibility and versatility better. I know it’s not “the same” but I find it quite easy to fake a flatwound feel with proper technique and a bit a foam. Close enough to fool a lot of peers at least haha.
I do expect to restring some with flats in the future but I dont believe there’ll be another massive takeover.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Just Wrong
Pulled off a most excellent set of EB Group IV flats for a set of Smith Compressors. The reason is I need the StingRay for a completely new project. Jason suggested the Smiths based on the criteria I gave him.

Just hate to see those flats go, because they are beautiful (to my ear). And hate to toss them before they even reach their prime. Originally installed the flats because I needed the full-on Bernard Edwards funk tone (and got it in spades). Now I need something else, so. Off they go. (The new project is tres :cool: )

The StingRay has worn rounds for 42 of its 46 years. My favorite rounds on this instrument are DR Black Beauties. Using the Smiths because their pulling tension is a very close match for the Group IV flats. The neck is absolutely stable. If the Black Beauties came in .040 - .096, I'd be all over a set.

The Nordy Cat bass wears GHS Balanced Nickels, end of story.

The Pyramid Gold flats are on the big semi-hollowbody, as they should be. "This bass should always wear flats," my luthier tells me, and I agree. It is my British Invasion bass, and dub bass. These are "forever" strings.

"Basses chose their strings," it is said, and I won't disagree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kyle_S
Must be nice.......unless I'm running the sound (smaller clubs) it seems to be the rule for me anymore. Were you handing pre or post signal off to the techs?

Edit: As I think about this, expectations also play a large part. A sound engineer will let highs pass through for certain styles (slap, etc). But for those of us playing in a rock environment there's an expectation that the bass will have little to no high end (as it should if the engineer is slotting frequencies) to fit properly into the mix. Every house engineer in this geographical area follows a similar formula. If you are a rock bassist you have to accept the fact that you will be mixed a certain way.
Always post, and often with a pedal board. However, after thinking about it, I have had subs cranked way too loud. That can kill your definition. But it happens a lot less than it used to when neo subs first appeared and everyone was so enamored with the extended lows that they forgot they were mixing bands.
 
Has anybody else gone back to rounds after using flats exclusively or predominantly for a long period of time?

I’d been using flats almost exclusively on my Fenders for 4 or 5 years when I sold them last year and bought a short scale 6-string bass that could only be strung with rounds.

I hated the rounds at first — rough and overly bright — and when I bought another 4-string Fender last month I thought for sure I was going to string it with flats, but… rounds are kinda cooler.

Sure, they’re a bit rougher, but it’s really not as bad as some flats player want you to believe. The noise you get with the fretting hand isn’t as bad either.

They’re bright, but at least I have the ability to turn the brightness down with muting or foam or the tone and treble knobs.

And they’re so much more flexible! (Yes, I know TIs are flexible, but it’s nice that most rounds are flexible).

I don’t know. I guess I got on the TB flats train because I feared I was missing out, and stayed on the train, believing that all rounds were rough, overly bright and that the noise was unbearable.

But I guess I now see why people were excited about rounds when they first came out.

Anybody else? What’s your story?

I install the Cobalt flat for my Charvel Pro Mod PJ since the day i have it. Several months ago, i swap the Cobalt flat with NYXL , 7250L and DR Sunbeam...... and finally back to Cobalt flat again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petch and Kyle_S