• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Anyone find Kalium too bright/zingy for rock?

For a few years I've been making my own balanced tension sets from SIT and D'addario nickel round wound strings (.040, .055, .080, .100, .130). But the B string often gets boomy around the 7th fret and the D and G strings sound thin.

I've been curious about Kalium for a while and last week I finally pulled the trigger on their 5 string hybrid (nickel/steel) balanced tension set .041 to .136. First of all, wow! These strings are really well balanced. All 5 of the strings sound great, the volume is equal across strings, the stiff feel of the low B is great, and they are super clear sounding. Great low mid punch too.

The only trouble is there's this really high end brightness/zing/fret clack that's hard to tame unless I turn my high EQ almost all the way down (BTW this is on a MM Bongo 5 HH). I had watched some online demos of the Kalium strings before, but they're mostly of metal/djent so I thought it was the guys' EQ and amp settings. I'm playing more mainstream rock.

I guess it could be that they just need time to break in, but I can't remember my other new strings being this bright (all my basses' strings are about a year old right now). I want to re-string my Sterling 5 HS for church this weekend and I have to decide if I should put SITs or Kaliums on it.
 
Last edited: