• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Are Sadowsky basses over rated?

Since we seem to have reanimated this zombie, and the thread sort of turned into a Fender vs Sadowsky diatribe(;)); perhaps, I will use this as an opportunity to update on my on going Jazz Bass investigations.

Marcus Miller somewhat famously was quoted as saying that a player needs to get their sound together, and then get on with playing. It has taken me a little longer than most (LOL); but, I think I'm finally getting there. And Roger's stuff is a big part of that.

A lot of this question is so relative to the individual player. A lot of cats can take a MIM Fender Jazz bass and be perfectly happy with it. For them, any kind of upgrade probably isn't "worth it."

To me, Roger's big contributions are his preamp for the Jazz Bass, his METICULOUS construction detail, and his setup perfection. You get those together in a Jazz Bass, and you get pretty close to what turns my gears. I can't speak to the P Bass aspects. To me, the P doesn't require a preamp; but Roger makes P's and then whether or not the player uses his preamp, the other two parts of a Sadowsky bass kick in; and a lot of cats on here love them.

Back to my own situation (and I'm a little slow, so please bear with me); I have been working with these two Jazz Basses the past few years:
Twins for Web.JPG

That's a '97 Jazz Deluxe in Shoreline Gold and a Metro RV4. I am one who thinks the Fender on the headstock has some value in audition situations vs anything non-Fender; so, where I have been at is that the RV4 just sounds so amazing and plays so perfectly, I was trying to bring the Fender up to the same standards. You can see here I had already replaced the Fender preamp with the Sadowsky preamp.

The next thing that happened was that I put a bling pickguard on the Fender (what the heck, Shoreline Gold = bling, right?); and I became dissatisfied with certain elements of the Sadowsky humcancelling pickups, and replaced those with Delano JMVC4 single slugs. Actually, I tried to find a set of the Suhr single slug pickups, couldn't find them, and then opted for the Delano's because they had some similarities in construction. Then what happened was that the Delano's were SO superior to the Suhr's that I started using the RV4 exclusively. But, I didn't want to give up on the Fender. So, I had a fret level done on the Fender, which addressed the playability aspects; but, the sound still wasn't there. So, finally I bit the bullet and sprang for another set of Delanos:
Jazz Deluxe Body for TB.JPG

And, voila, now these two basses pretty much behave and sound the same; and both meet my sound objectives.

Neglecting the pickups, I have about $1500 all told into the Fender; and that would compare to maybe $1700 to $1800 that you would pay for the RV4 on the used market (I purchased the Fender used). So, the difference is about $200 to $300; but, I had to do a lot of leg work and know what I was going for to get the Fender up to speed. Also, I installed the preamp myself and didn't count that.

My conclusion is that if you want to get the sound that Sadowsky Jazz basses offer; their market cost is "worth it." If you don't need that sound and an MIM is sufficient; then, they may not be "worth it."

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

BTW, at this point, I am pondering moving the RV4 to have the NYC shop build me something a little more specialized. We'll see. Would that be "worth it?" It could be for me, for reasons I don't feel the need to justify. Good luck in your bass questing.:D
 
The pre-amps are damn good, I've heard. But I've also heard the rest of the instrument is nothing to rave about, for the price.
IME, the construction and setup on the Sadowsky basses, including the Japan shop, are perfect and flawless. Completely different from the Fender, which requires considerable additional effort and cost to get into remotely the same ballpark.
 
The joy of Sadowsky Bassed is once they are played with a band

Solo they seem to be like any standard JBass - not a MASSIVE low end and ok mids and high end

The second you play in a band situation, the beast is released

Cuts through so crystal clear - you can be heard and articulate so stunningly clear without turning up

If you are a bass player that loves to cut through and not play only the root, Sadowsky are absolutely not overrated

If you are happy to this along on the root and provide the rumble (nothing wrong with that!!) then they probably are overrated

Horses for courses :-)
 
IMO Sadowsky basses are not overpriced compared to other basses produced by small shops and built to such high quality standards. Plus, Roger offers a lower priced Metro Line that doesn't skimp on the quality.

If an NYC Sadowsky is too expensive for a person's income, there's the Metro Line, if that's still too expensive, find a used Metro.

The joy of Sadowsky Bassed is once they are played with a band......Cuts through so crystal clear - you can be heard and articulate so stunningly clear without turning up

That's ultra, ultra important to me; being audible in a live mix without having to turn up so loud that you're wiping out the rest of the band, and chasing off your audience.

It took me quite a few different basses, and spent a lot of money before I had a custom bass built with a tone that works well in a live mix.

I've never seen a Sadowsky in my area to try out, I'd really like to though, and I'm confident that the Sadowsky shops produce top quality instruments, no need for modifications, although some folks do swap out the HC pickups for SC's, or vice versa, I personally don't consider that a modification.

I can't remember a single Sadowsky thread where a poster complained about fretwork when they bought a new Sadowsky. Attention to the smallest details is going to cost a bit more. I can happily live with that.

I've enjoyed watching Roger's 'Behind the Notes' video on YouTube more than once, his dedication to the important details regarding his instruments and his stellar customer service is admirable.

Just my two cents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MickyD and TheBear
I am one who thinks the Fender on the headstock has some value in audition situations vs anything non-Fender; so, where I have been at is that the RV4 just sounds so amazing and plays so perfectly, I was trying to bring the Fender up to the same standards.

Wouldn't it have been easier and cheaper to put a Fender logo on the Sadowsky?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StayLow
I used to think they are, but I think the NYC models are definitely on par with the Fender Custom Shop stuff (which is my favorite).. I also now prefer the Sadowsky pre-amp for active basses... if you're going passive, the Fender stuff is still king, but I love this preamp so much, I added it to my Fender Masterbuilt Jazz (to the Chagrin of my builder)..

But yeah, I like the Sadowsky basses, but for me, at the same price, I'd rather just get a Fender customshop and mod it with the Sadowsky pre..
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucephylus
Exactly correct. When someone makes a bass they have a vision of what it should be. Are my SX basses "overrated"? Some say yes. Chinese junk etc. But if what they do fits my vision of what I want in a bass then the answer is no. Roger has a vision too. And if his vision fits your vision, then what he charges isn't too much. It's how you get what you are looking for. If it doesn't then sure, they are overrated because they aren't free and you have no interest in them.

I have several high end basses.
I gig with Squiers.
 
I must confess I have just sold my Sadowsky metro MV4. It was the best set up and finished guitar I have ever owned and played. Ultimately I never quite gelled with it, it just seemed a tad sterile. I have a 63 Jazz and a fiftieth anniversary jazz, neither of which are as well set up but both seem to me to be more responsive and "expressive" for want of a better term. The Sadowsky was way superior to my (also just sold) 68 jazz. I will own another Sadowsky, probably an NYC and definitely one with single coil pickups (yes, I know I could have put these on my MV4).
The point of this post? I think there is no "better" between Sadowsky and Fender, it still boils down to the bass itself. Are Sadowsky basses overrated? No - their quality and consistency is second to none IMO. I would buy a Sadowsky blind, not so a Fender.
BUT....... when you find that one special Fender that is magic and speaks to you, it is very hard to beat it with any bass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheBear
No - their quality and consistency is second to none IMO. I would buy a Sadowsky blind, not so a Fender.
BUT....... when you find that one special Fender that is magic and speaks to you, it is very hard to beat it with any bass.

Talking purely about the NYC stuff here, but I think people conflate Fender's various lines when they draw comparisons to Sadowsky.. Reality is, if you're in the market for a $5500 NYC, you're also in the market for a masterbuilt Fender... There are literally only 8 guys at Fender who are able to be assigned to build your bass, and a large part of it is done by them, by hand.. The selection of woods is the of the highest grade, the finish also of the highest grade, etc... So a more Apples to Apples comparison when talking about an NYC is one of these, and I'd argue that Fender has the edge at that price point for quality and fit/finish...
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheBear
After a certain price point, certain instruments are all great, and you just choose what works for you best. If there's a better custom J-Bass for me than a Sadowsky that can be purchased new, I have yet to encounter it. Admittedly, I quit actively looking because Sadowsky made the instrument with the sound I heard in my head when I bought my first one 20 years ago.

You don't just buy the excellent design and build quality, you also get a level of support and service after the sale that's rarely equaled in the electric guitar industry. When you call the shop, you don't have to go through a call center menu or wait on hold - Roger still answers the phone there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheBear
Talking purely about the NYC stuff here, but I think people conflate Fender's various lines when they draw comparisons to Sadowsky.. Reality is, if you're in the market for a $5500 NYC, you're also in the market for a masterbuilt Fender... There are literally only 8 guys at Fender who are able to be assigned to build your bass, and a large part of it is done by them, by hand.. The selection of woods is the of the highest grade, the finish also of the highest grade, etc... So a more Apples to Apples comparison when talking about an NYC is one of these, and I'd argue that Fender has the edge at that price point for quality and fit/finish...
I'm glad to hear someone talked one of the Fender builders into installing one of Roger's preamps in one of their instruments.

For my part, I have had nothing but the absolutely worst interactions with both the Custom Shop directly and the dealers who represent them. We've got one of them here in Tucson. Arrogant. Don't want my business. Special people. No thanks. I like Jazz Basses. Always have. But, Fender apparently thinks I'm not good enough to play them.

IF I were going that route, the Sadowsky shop is more aligned with regular working stiffs, such as myself. Super nice folks. Easy to work with.

IMO/E
 
I have several high end basses.
I gig with Squiers.

Well I have several high end basses too and I gig with my Squires and SX basses...sometimes. I also sometimes gig with the high end ones. It isn't about a rule as to gigging with a certain brand or price range, it's about choosing a tool for the given job that does it best. If I want what my Squier does I grab it, if I want what my Alembic does I grab that one instead. That's the rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: malthumb