TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Agreed, appearance does count and cosmetics help sell basses. As far as bridges, my parts Jazz has a cheap bent metal Squier bridge and sounds fantastic. I see no reason to upgrade other than wanting a quick release model.Could a builder skip the veneer (or top) and upgrade other components - possibly. I believe they either have the market experience or research that's telling them that the veneer is the way to go from a sales volume perspective. It's also questionable if a bridge upgrade (meaning a more expensive bridge) translates into a better instrument.
I agree. I really don’t care for it myself but to each his own. Basses are not one size fits all.Totally a personal preference, but they are a turnoff for me. Not to be all armchair psychologist but something about perfect exotic figuring and book-matched top grain that doesn’t match the back doesn’t sit well with me. Honestly, I think it traces back to the Fender photo flame basses that came out in the 90s…which just felt artificial and superficial. The hamburgler just took it to the next level.
Well you know how Guitar Center can be, instruments in dire need of a setup...Yeah, I got to try a couple out while hanging on this-or-that store's walls and they were very nice. But, all the overwhelmingly positive feedback from people here on TB is what made me think grabbing one was a good idea. (...well, that and finding one in the Classifieds at at stoopid-fine price may have impacted my decision-making process.)
That could apply to other components too, right? I mean, a bass doesn't "need" pretty knobs, fancy fret markers, or an elaborately carved headstock, and the time and money that went into those features could instead have been spent on extra time fine-tuning the setup and feel of a plainer instrument.They don’t bother me, per-se but I wonder where they could upgrade other components and skimp on the aesthetic top….
Veneer is a good thing in the realm of basses because of density. Most of the woods used to pretty up the front of a bass are much more dense than swamp ash - if you make a bass that's solid from most of those woods, the thing would be ungodly heavy. A veneer allows you to have the "pretty" without the weight.Is this because quality woods are becoming harder to source? Are they a turnoff to you implying a “budget” experience?
Thoughts?
...it may make you feel that it's trying to be something it's not. Like luxury features in a Kia.
sounds like you're being practical = i like practical! let the end user mod the look he/she wants...and pay for it!That could apply to other components too, right? I mean, a bass doesn't "need" pretty knobs, fancy fret markers, or an elaborately carved headstock, and the time and money that went into those features could instead have been spent on extra time fine-tuning the setup and feel of a plainer instrument.
i sure get your point, and i'm inclined to agree, generally. that said, i have nothing against veneer. i enjoy looking at all of the NBD threads as i catch them, and of course, they're loaded with veneered EBs.... and they look super!They don’t bother me, per-se but I wonder where they could upgrade other components and skimp on the aesthetic top….
