• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

are we being ripped off by expensive manufactured basses?

I'm usually wrong about most things, but I think maybe I know something you don't here. I believe a Gibson Thunderbird has a 9-laminate neck and a Classic-IV Pro has a 7-laminate neck. There may also be some minor differences in shape. I'm also pretty sure all of Gibson's bass runs are very low quantity, so I doubt that they spend more than a couple days a year cutting Thunderbird bodies. Given the low quantities and construction differences, I think it is fairly reasonable to believe that Gibson Thunderbirds are glued and cut in the United States.

Judging from the glue, sanding and finish work on my Gibson Thunderbird, I'm reasonably sure they only make Thunderbirds on Fridays after 3pm. Fortunately, they do fret work and set them up shortly after they hand out the bonus checks. :)
My Epi T-bird Classic IV Pro has the same 9 piece neck. The site says 7, but there's definitely 9 on it.
 
My Epi T-bird Classic IV Pro has the same 9 piece neck. The site says 7, but there's definitely 9 on it.
Really! Mine is white, but I will have to see if I can see the laminations through the paint.

EDIT: Good thing I prefaced my post by saying that I am wrong a lot! I can only make out 5 laminations on my solid-color Epi, but pictures online clearly show the Epi is 9 laminates, just like the Gibson. That doesn't prove the bodies are made in the same factory, but it doesn't mean they aren't, either.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: awilkie84
You got it, David...just beware...mine is a double barrel:

131023-db.jpg
 
Another way of putting it is, "You're not getting ripped off by them if you're not buying their basses."

I have to admit I jump in with the pitchforks and torches mobs sometimes, but this is really no different than the $1000 instrument cables IMO. The problem is when people start saying "Well of course you can't hear the difference, but I can." In my case, just like with the overpriced audio cable audiophiles, I just snicker and say "Well, I'm an amateur...guilty as charged"
 
I have to admit I jump in with the pitchforks and torches mobs sometimes, but this is really no different than the $1000 instrument cables IMO. The problem is when people start saying "Well of course you can't hear the difference, but I can." In my case, just like with the overpriced audio cable audiophiles, I just snicker and say "Well, I'm an amateur...guilty as charged"
My Fodera Viceroy doesn't sound better than my Fender Jazz bass. Different, but not better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dblbass
I for one am glad we have the Bolshevik Party to define for us what constitutes "fair" and "unfair" pricing in the bass marketplace. Though I don't seem to have seen the official line of demarcation between the two. $500? $700?
 
I tend to think that there's a certain price point beyond which you don't get any extra "quality", you just get more expensive features and exclusivity.

If you disagree, ask yourself which is "better" - a $20000 bass from a top custom builder or a $22000 bass from the same top builder? Or are they both brilliant instruments and you'd just need personal preference to choose between them? Now understand that the dividing line for many people is *way* short of $20k (but varied from person to person) which is why these arguments happen.

What some people at the inexpensive end of the argument don't understand is that some people value aesthetics, exclusivity, and expensive features even if these things don't necessarily "improve" the sound coming out of the speaker.

What some people at the expensive end of the argument don't realise is that some people aren't prepared to pay a premium for aesthetics, exclusivity, and expensive features because these things hold less value for them.

In short, once you get to a certain price "more expensive" doesn't correlate with "better", but at the same time "more expensive" also doesn't need to mean "rip off".