• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

are we being ripped off by expensive manufactured basses?

I don't think he discredited the art of lutherie any more than he discredited the art of watchmaking. (Does anyone know an actual watchmaker? I do.) Point is, machines can replicate really, really well what it used to take skilled craftsman to do. That's true in nearly every area of human endeavor.
I don't think he discredited the art of lutherie any more than he discredited the art of watchmaking. (Does anyone know an actual watchmaker? I do.) Point is, machines can replicate really, really well what it used to take skilled craftsman to do. That's true in nearly every area of human endeavor.

Yes machines can replicate very well. However, play a hand made Pedulla Neck against a cnc neck, then ask yourself if there is a difference. (you are the only one it will matter to in the end).
 
  • Like
Reactions: guitarflinger
The thing is, everyone is totally entitled to buy and enjoy playing any bass they want. But, if you want to play in a band or group, and/or record tracks on albums these super expensive basses are usually not worth the hassle of using.

I am sure they are valid for some people but given what I do I am not sure I'd want to take an expensive bass into the venue without chaining it to my wrist first and that would make visiting the bathroom really tricky. For the likes of Victor Wooten and so on it makes sense as he's a great player and he probably has a guy to watch his gear if not someone to pee for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: warrplayer
Had money in my pocket, went to his shop, got treated like **** - took my money and spent it elsewhere.

Isn't he the same guy that started producing Greg Curbow's designs after Greg died - without paying for the design?

Dan
 
I've played on $200 basses that I've loved, and I've played on $5000 basses that I've loved. I've never played an Alembic, nor have I played a Fedora. Honestly, I would only try one on pure curiosity with absolutely no intention to buy it.

The fact of the matter is this; Bass guitars are simply made by brands, weather big or small, cheap or inexpensive (There IS a difference), or lavish and expensive, whatever! All these companies are in competition for our money. It's like going to the store for a jar of salsa. Pace is a big brand for that part of the market, but when I reach for a good salsa, I choose a particular store brand. There's nothing wrong with Pace. It's good! But the Kroger Private Selection that I buy tastes better and costs less. Of course that's only my opinion, but taste is always subjective and can't be quantified. The same is often true in musical instruments.

In the end, in many cases, consumers are simply paying for a name, plain and simple, and in big names come cost. I understand that wood, hardware, and components cost money, as does labour. We're paying for all of this and more when we buy an instrument. It doesn't matter if something was "hand crafted" or "Machine crafted". They're ALL machine crafted! All those power tools? Yep. Thought so.

We're paying people's paychecks when we buy a bass, weather it be the CEO, someone in production, marketing, or whatever. We're paying for materials, we're paying for power to run equipment and lights. Seriously, how much do YOU think it costs to run Fender? Their marketing costs alone is staggering! They easily pay more annually for marketing than most people make in a year! But we're also paying for staplers, computers, toilet paper, maintenance, etc.

Now I'm not saying that companies like Fedora or Alembic don't over price for what you get. I'm sure they're fine instruments, but personally, I think buying $10,000 instruments is completely ridiculous, but hey...to each their own. Again, you're paying for a NAME. If someone wants to pay their prices, great! More power to them! Do I think that the customer is "ripped off"? Absolutely not. In the end, it comes down to what someone wants. It comes down to a question of "How much is owning this brand worth to ME?".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: drummer5359
There isn't much differnce between a Squier and a custom built bass but the custom built people have higher overhead and sell fewer guitars so they need to charge more. If you don't mind paying five times as much for a bass that's 10% better, then go for it.

I disagree with that .. Not sure about the number or the notion that there is "not much" difference betyween a Squire and a custom bass.. Custom by definition means that it is made to order and that in and of itself, whether in watches, cars, motorcycles or guitars is going to change the pricepoint considerably.

To the OP's original point. All basses are made pretty much the same way. Assuming the wood is good and the woring is correct and the pups are decent, the only difference might be a little quality control. Then again, even boutiques can have their problems. I know.

This true to an extent... but IMO correct wiring, good wood, as in not warped or scarred and "decent" pups are the standard that any bass would be expected to have.

And keep in mind the cost of living. A $300 Squier would be comparable to a $75 dollar bass in 1984. How good of a bass could you get for $75 back then?!?!?!

A $300 Squire today is much better than any bass you could get for $75 in 1984. In fact I would dare to say that a $300 Squire today is better than any $300 bass you could get in 1984.

So as to the original question... I agree 100% with FretNoMore and dougazbass ... it is only a rip off if you think it is and if you are forced to buy it. I will never spend 10K on a bass.. but if someone else wants to and can.. that is their business and as long as they are happy with what they buy the notion of a rip off is moot. I doubt I will ever spend more than 3K on a bass unless I hit the lottery or something like that but I can see the difference between all my recent (by recent I mean say from 2000 to the present) basses in relation to their original price point and the quality of the build..
 
  • Like
Reactions: malthumb
There are those that know the price of something, but not the value.

Very true. Price is one thing, value another, and it's an individual thing. You pay the asking price if what you get is worth it to you, and then, of course, you do get your money's worth. It's only a ripoff if you were led to believe that you would get something better for your money than you actually got.
 
If modern manufacturing techniques are so accurate and "better", why can no one reproduce the sound of a Stradivarius or the other master luthiers of that time? There's more than just the building method. Some builders are just better than others.

It supposedly had to do with the trees which were growing during the little ice age, slow growth = denser wood. According to NatGeo at least :D

There is a ton of theory, and no proof, on why those violins are better than modern ones. It's been speculated that wood density because of a "little ice age" was it, that it was where the wood was grown, that the wood was submerged underwater in Venice, that the wood contains odd trace minerals/chemicals, that it was the type of beetle they used to make shellac, the list keeps growing. But no one can actually prove their claim.

There is, in fact, significant evidence that violinists actually prefer top quality modern violins when double blind tested against top quality historic instruments.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
 
  • Like
Reactions: digmeout
There is, in fact, significant evidence that violinists actually prefer top quality modern violins when double blind tested against top quality historic instruments.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed


Exactly. But the romantic notion of magical ancient craftsman dies hard. Sure, maybe up until the 1970's there was no better violin that a Stradivarius. Then the newer ones got better and better but it was hard to accept, or at least admit. Today, they are made better than ever.

I guess if you own a million dollar strad you may want to admit that you can get a better violin for $10,000, just like if you own a custom built bass, you may not want to admit that the $500 Ibanez sounds better. But the proof's in the pudding. Players after both playing and hearing the new instruments prefer them.

With electric guitars, the "hand craftmanship" is far less of an issue. Putting pickups in a routed hole is not brain surgery. The biggest factor between cheap guitars and good ones have always been the necks. They aren't hand carving the necks. In fact, today, with the way the machines cut the wood, you have a better chance of getting a good neck on a $500 bass than you did on a top of the line model in 1980.