• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Aria SB models

I posted this in the "Aria Pro II Club", but I thought it might get more attention here.

I'm looking at the Aria SB1000 and the SB700. I wanted to get some opinions of those who have seen them and played with them.


This is what I'm assuming. Tell me if I'm wrong.
1. The SB700 is basically the "passive only" version of the SB1000. In other words, it's a 1000 with the six-way attack switch removed.
2. Since it's passive only, the 700 doesn't need a battery.
3. If you bypass the EQ on the 1000, then you can play it without a battery too.
4. The 1000 costs ~$500 more than the 700. In other words, the six-way switch costs ~$500. Whether it's worth paying for is up to you.

Tell me if I'm wrong about any of this. And tell me what else I need to know before pulling the trigger.

FWIW - All things equal, I prefer thinner necks and smaller bodies. And I like to play hard rock and heavy metal (a la Cliff Burton). And I almost always play with a pick. (If that means anything.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tindrum
I posted this in the "Aria Pro II Club", but I thought it might get more attention here.

I'm looking at the Aria SB1000 and the SB700. I wanted to get some opinions of those who have seen them and played with them.


This is what I'm assuming. Tell me if I'm wrong.
1. The SB700 is basically the "passive only" version of the SB1000. In other words, it's a 1000 with the six-way attack switch removed.
2. Since it's passive only, the 700 doesn't need a battery.
3. If you bypass the EQ on the 1000, then you can play it without a battery too.
4. The 1000 costs ~$500 more than the 700. In other words, the six-way switch costs ~$500. Whether it's worth paying for is up to you.

Tell me if I'm wrong about any of this. And tell me what else I need to know before pulling the trigger.

FWIW - All things equal, I prefer thinner necks and smaller bodies. And I like to play hard rock and heavy metal (a la Cliff Burton). And I almost always play with a pick. (If that means anything.)
I’ve owned many Aria SBs and currently have 5 of them. What you listed pretty much nails it. The active preamp on the SB1000 really only impacts the 6 way rotary, which honestly is of dubious value. It’s kinda like a varitone circuit in that it cuts/adds frequencies but it really just gives you 5 different not very musical tones. Ranges from a weird honk to “bass underwater”. Kinda ridiculous actually. The first position on the switch is great buts it really just the passive tone only a little louder and a smidge brighter. The SB tone, that big midrange punch, really is best served by the 700 as you’re saving $500 at the start for sounds you very likely won’t like or use.
 
I’ve owned many Aria SBs and currently have 5 of them. What you listed pretty much nails it. The active preamp on the SB1000 really only impacts the 6 way rotary, which honestly is of dubious value. It’s kinda like a varitone circuit in that it cuts/adds frequencies but it really just gives you 5 different not very musical tones. Ranges from a weird honk to “bass underwater”. Kinda ridiculous actually. The first position on the switch is great buts it really just the passive tone only a little louder and a smidge brighter. The SB tone, that big midrange punch, really is best served by the 700 as you’re saving $500 at the start for sounds you very likely won’t like or use.
This. I have an SB1000 and I generally use the first position of the 6 way rotary. Sometimes 3 too, but the rest are generally not super useful. I would go for the 700 and save some money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tindrum