Y'all who are LP advocates ought to read your own posts about all the details of the playback equipment that have to be optimized to get that superior performance out of the LP. Then consider that the $100 CD player playing the standard commercial CD delivers nearly the same output, and does it with zero fiddling with the equipment, zero care of the storage medium, and with as near zero degradation with time and successive playings as makes no difference.
I say again, I'm willing to grant that immaculately-cared-for LPs, played on high end equipment (and I accept the judgement that it doesn't have to be expensive if you know what to look for and how to set it up properly - after all, my electric bass is a $150 Squier), sound better than a standard commercial CD played on standard commercial equipment. (And the amp and speakers and room are assumed to be the same, here.) But the real world of playing LPs for people who want to listen to the music rather than working with the equipment, when the LP was the standard, was to play the LP on one of those Sears turntable/amp combos through some small speakers that came with the system, using the cartridge and stylus that came with the thing, and to occasionally wipe the record down with a soft cleaning rag. Also the real-world-typical LP being played on this equipment was the record you bought for $6.99 at the big record store or the grocery store or the Sanger-Harris record department, produced to the minimum specs that would allow it to play semi-reliably, not a high quality pressing.
Oh, don't forget stacking four or five records on the spindle and having them drop down on top of each other, plus occasionally the little steel finger that pushed them to the side to drop down would misfire and slide over the top of the disk - that can't have been good for the records.
In that real world, that I and most other people inhabited, the world where people were not really interested in the details of their record player, just wanted to clap the record on the thing and have music come out, the CD was a great step forward. Clear sound, no hisses pops crackles, sounds the same the 100th playing as the first, if it gets dirty it might skip but it won't be harmed, no maintenance required.
I was there, I remember.
It's a lot like folks who romanticize a 1965 automobile. Well, again, I was there, and I remember 10,000 mile spark plug changes, constant carburetor adjustment, the points were NEVER set just right, and the stench of gasoline whenever you passed; the thing ALWAYS either ran too rich or too lean. With all that you were lucky if you could wring 20 miles per gallon out of it, and the engine was generally worn out by 120,000 miles, but if you lived north of the Dixon Line it was rusted out long before that anyway. You can argue that the driving experience was "purer" and "more contemplative" but if its 3:00 in the morning and I'm standing in a sleet storm with the hood up trying to get the thing to run so I can get to work at 7:00, I'm gonna trade that '65 for a 2020 Honda so fast your head'll spin.